Simplify the implementation of interface conversions in the compiler.
Don't pass fields that aren't needed (the data word, usually) to the runtime.
For generics, we need to put a dynamic type in an interface. The new
dataWord function is exactly what we need (the type word will come
from a dictionary).
Change-Id: Iade5de5c174854b65ad248f35c7893c603f7be3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/340029
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
If -d=ssa/PASS/debug=N is specified (N >= 2) for a rewrite pass
(e.g. lower), when a Value (or Block) is rewritten, print the
Value (or Block) before and after.
For #31915.
Updates #19013.
Change-Id: I80eadd44302ae736bc7daed0ef68529ab7a16776
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/176718
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
With this change, code like
h := sha1.New()
h.Write(buf)
sum := h.Sum()
gets compiled into static calls rather than
interface calls, because the compiler is able
to prove that 'h' is really a *sha1.digest.
The InterCall re-write rule hits a few dozen times
during make.bash, and hundreds of times during all.bash.
The most common pattern identified by the compiler
is a constructor like
func New() Interface { return &impl{...} }
where the constructor gets inlined into the caller,
and the result is used immediately. Examples include
{sha1,md5,crc32,crc64,...}.New, base64.NewEncoder,
base64.NewDecoder, errors.New, net.Pipe, and so on.
Some existing benchmarks that change on darwin/amd64:
Crc64/ISO4KB-8 2.67µs ± 1% 2.66µs ± 0% -0.36% (p=0.015 n=10+10)
Crc64/ISO1KB-8 694ns ± 0% 690ns ± 1% -0.59% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Adler32KB-8 473ns ± 1% 471ns ± 0% -0.39% (p=0.010 n=10+9)
On architectures like amd64, the reduction in code size
appears to contribute more to benchmark improvements than just
removing the indirect call, since that branch gets predicted
accurately when called in a loop.
Updates #19361
Change-Id: I57d4dc21ef40a05ec0fbd55a9bb0eb74cdc67a3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38139
Run-TryBot: Philip Hofer <phofer@umich.edu>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This reverts commit 4e0c7c3f61.
Reason for revert: The presence-of-optimization test program is fragile, breaks under noopt, and might break if the Go libraries are tweaked. It needs to be (re)written without reference to other packages.
Change-Id: I3aaf1ab006a1a255f961a978e9c984341740e3c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38097
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
With this change, code like
h := sha1.New()
h.Write(buf)
sum := h.Sum()
gets compiled into static calls rather than
interface calls, because the compiler is able
to prove that 'h' is really a *sha1.digest.
The InterCall re-write rule hits a few dozen times
during make.bash, and hundreds of times during all.bash.
The most common pattern identified by the compiler
is a constructor like
func New() Interface { return &impl{...} }
where the constructor gets inlined into the caller,
and the result is used immediately. Examples include
{sha1,md5,crc32,crc64,...}.New, base64.NewEncoder,
base64.NewDecoder, errors.New, net.Pipe, and so on.
Some existing benchmarks that change on darwin/amd64:
Crc64/ISO4KB-8 2.67µs ± 1% 2.66µs ± 0% -0.36% (p=0.015 n=10+10)
Crc64/ISO1KB-8 694ns ± 0% 690ns ± 1% -0.59% (p=0.001 n=10+10)
Adler32KB-8 473ns ± 1% 471ns ± 0% -0.39% (p=0.010 n=10+9)
On architectures like amd64, the reduction in code size
appears to contribute more to benchmark improvements than just
removing the indirect call, since that branch gets predicted
accurately when called in a loop.
Updates #19361
Change-Id: Ia9d30afdd5f6b4d38d38b14b88f308acae8ce7ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37751
Run-TryBot: Philip Hofer <phofer@umich.edu>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
