mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-21 14:34:41 -07:00
programming_faq: added question on T vs *T method sets
Adding this question on Russ' recommendation - not sure if there is some detail here I'm missing. The associated discussion was: http://groups.google.com/group/golang-nuts/t/ec6b27e332ed7f77 R=rsc, r CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/887042
This commit is contained in:
parent
2379fdec04
commit
fb2758167f
@ -125,7 +125,43 @@ should recognise such cases and optimize its use of OS threads. For now,
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="Closures">Closures</h2>
|
||||
<h2 id="Functions_methods">Functions and Methods</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="different_method_sets">
|
||||
Why do T and *T have different method sets?</h3>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
From the <a href="http://golang.org/doc/go_spec.html#Types">Go Spec</a>:
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockquote>
|
||||
The method set of any other named type <code>T</code> consists of all methods
|
||||
with receiver type <code>T</code>. The method set of the corresponding pointer
|
||||
type <code>*T</code> is the set of all methods with receiver <code>*T</code> or
|
||||
<code>T</code> (that is, it also contains the method set of <code>T</code>).
|
||||
</blockquote>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
If an interface value contains a pointer <code>*T</code>,
|
||||
a method call can obtain a value by dereferencing the pointer,
|
||||
but if an interface value contains a value <code>T</code>,
|
||||
there is no useful way for a method call to obtain a pointer.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
If not for this restriction, this code:
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
var buf bytes.Buffer
|
||||
io.Copy(buf, os.Stdin)
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
would copy standard input into a <i>copy</i> of <code>buf</code>,
|
||||
not into <code>buf</code> itself.
|
||||
This is almost never the desired behavior.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="closures_and_goroutines">
|
||||
Why am I confused by the way my closures behave as goroutines?</h3>
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user