mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-26 15:06:52 -07:00
cmd/cgo: don't resolve typedefs in -godefs mode
In -godefs mode any typedefs that appear in struct fields and the like will presumably be defined in the input file. If we resolve to the base type, those cross-references will not work. So for -godefs mode, keep the Go 1.10 behavior and don't resolve the typedefs in a loop. Fixes #26644 Change-Id: I48cf72d9eb5016353c43074e6aff6495af326f35 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/125995 Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
911a5fda13
commit
ead59f4bf3
18
misc/cgo/testgodefs/fieldtypedef.go
Normal file
18
misc/cgo/testgodefs/fieldtypedef.go
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserve d.
|
||||
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
||||
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// +build ignore
|
||||
|
||||
package main
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
struct S1 { int f1; };
|
||||
struct S2 { struct S1 s1; };
|
||||
typedef struct S1 S1Type;
|
||||
typedef struct S2 S2Type;
|
||||
*/
|
||||
import "C"
|
||||
|
||||
type S1 C.S1Type
|
||||
type S2 C.S2Type
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
# We are testing cgo -godefs, which translates Go files that use
|
||||
# import "C" into Go files with Go definitions of types defined in the
|
||||
# import "C" block. Add more tests here.
|
||||
FILE_PREFIXES="anonunion issue8478"
|
||||
FILE_PREFIXES="anonunion issue8478 fieldtypedef"
|
||||
|
||||
RM=
|
||||
for FP in $FILE_PREFIXES
|
||||
|
@ -180,6 +180,13 @@ func (p *Package) Translate(f *File) {
|
||||
if len(needType) > 0 {
|
||||
p.loadDWARF(f, needType)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// In godefs mode we're OK with the typedefs, which
|
||||
// will presumably also be defined in the file, we
|
||||
// don't want to resolve them to their base types.
|
||||
if *godefs {
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if p.rewriteCalls(f) {
|
||||
// Add `import _cgo_unsafe "unsafe"` after the package statement.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user