mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-24 22:00:09 -07:00
exp/locale/collate: avoid 16-bit math
There's no need for the 16-bit arithmetic here, and it tickles a long-standing compiler bug. Fix the exp code not to use 16-bit math and create an explicit test for the compiler bug. R=golang-dev, r CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/6256048
This commit is contained in:
parent
c44768cb1c
commit
ce69666273
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ const (
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func splitContractIndex(ce colElem) (index, n, offset int) {
|
||||
h := uint16(ce)
|
||||
h := ce & 0xffff
|
||||
return int(h >> maxNBits), int(h & (1<<maxNBits - 1)), int(ce>>16) & (1<<maxContractOffsetBits - 1)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
21
test/bugs/bug440.go
Normal file
21
test/bugs/bug440.go
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
// $G $D/$F.go && $L $F.$A && ./$A.out
|
||||
// # switch above to 'run' when bug gets fixed.
|
||||
// # right now it only breaks on 8g
|
||||
|
||||
// Test for 8g register move bug. The optimizer gets confused
|
||||
// about 16- vs 32-bit moves during splitContractIndex.
|
||||
|
||||
package main
|
||||
|
||||
func main() {
|
||||
const c = 0x12345678
|
||||
index, n, offset := splitContractIndex(c)
|
||||
if index != int((c&0xffff)>>5) || n != int(c & (1<<5-1)) || offset != (c>>16)&(1<<14-1) {
|
||||
println("BUG", index, n, offset)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func splitContractIndex(ce uint32) (index, n, offset int) {
|
||||
h := uint16(ce)
|
||||
return int(h >> 5), int(h & (1<<5 - 1)), int(ce>>16) & (1<<14 - 1)
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user