qbit/go
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-26 11:38:01 -07:00
Code Releases Activity

go/types: fix error message for consistency

Browse Source 
Follow-up on https://golang.org/cl/271706 .
(Missed a review comment.)

Change-Id: Ibff542f43d721600a2452907c0a20941961e793f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/271766
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This commit is contained in:
Robert Griesemer 2020-11-19 16:38:11 -08:00
parent 7eed73f36f
commit c72a448881
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/go/types/expr.go
View File

@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ func (check *Checker) binary(x *operand, e *ast.BinaryExpr, lhs, rhs ast.Expr, o
// TODO(gri) We should report exactly what went wrong. At the // TODO(gri) We should report exactly what went wrong. At the
// moment we don't have the (go/constant) API for that. // moment we don't have the (go/constant) API for that.
// See also TODO in go/constant/value.go. // See also TODO in go/constant/value.go.
check.errorf(atPos(e.OpPos), _InvalidConstVal, "constant result not representable") check.errorf(atPos(e.OpPos), _InvalidConstVal, "constant result is not representable")
// TODO(gri) Should we mark operands with unknown values as invalid? // TODO(gri) Should we mark operands with unknown values as invalid?
} }
// Typed constants must be representable in // Typed constants must be representable in