From c59d2f13aa73468c43ec46040689e5219a9c140b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:48:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] - moved spec todo's into spec (as html comment) - cleaned up
 todo.txt a bit

R=r
OCL=15009
CL=15009
---
 doc/go_spec.txt | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/go_spec.txt b/doc/go_spec.txt
index 62f456d9d12..380dbbfaa3a 100644
--- a/doc/go_spec.txt
+++ b/doc/go_spec.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ The Go Programming Language Specification (DRAFT)
 Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, Ken Thompson
 
 ----
-(September 8, 2008)
+(September 9, 2008)
 
 
 This document is a semi-formal specification of the Go systems
@@ -16,6 +16,41 @@ Any part may change substantially as design progresses.
 </font>
 
 
+<!--
+Open issues according to gri:
+[ ] clarification on interface types, rules
+[ ] methods for all types
+[ ] remove "any"
+[ ] convert should not be used for composite literals anymore,
+	in fact, convert() should go away
+[ ] syntax for var args
+[ ] reflection support in the language
+[ ] partial export of structs, methods
+[ ] if statement: else syntax must be fixed
+[ ] range statement: to be defined more reasonably
+[ ] packages of multiple files: dealing with it is convoluted
+[ ] should we have a shorter list of alias types? (byte, int, uint, float)
+[ ] old-style export decls (still needed, but ideally should go away)
+[ ] new(arraytype, n1, n2): spec only talks about length, not capacity
+    (should only use new(arraytype, n) - this will allow later
+	 extension to multi-dim arrays w/o breaking the language)
+[ ] & needed to get a function pointer from a function?
+[ ] comparison operators: can we compare interfaces?
+[ ] optional semicolons: too complicated and unclear
+[ ] like to have assert() in the language, w/ option to disable code gen for it
+[ ] composite types should uniformly create an instance instead of a pointer
+[ ] func literal like a composite type - should probably require the '&' to get
+    address
+[ ] meaning of nil
+[ ] clarify slice rules
+[ ] something on tuples?
+[ ] semantics of statements
+[ ] need for type switch? (or use type guard with ok in tuple assignment?)
+[ ] can we add methods to types defined in another package?
+[ ] do we need anything on package vs file names?
+
+-->
+
 Contents
 ----