mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-05 11:46:12 -07:00
runtime: weaken claim about SetFinalizer panicking
Currently the SetFinalizer documentation makes a strong claim that SetFinalizer will panic if the pointer is not to an object allocated by calling new, to a composite literal, or to a local variable. This is not true. For example, it doesn't panic when passed the address of a package-level variable. Nor can we practically make it true. For example, we can't distinguish between passing a pointer to a composite literal and passing a pointer to its first field. Hence, weaken the guarantee to say that it "may" panic. Updates #17311. (Might fix it, depending on what we want to do with package-level variables.) Change-Id: I1c68ea9d0a5bbd3dd1b7ce329d92b0f05e2e0877 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30137 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22a2bdfedb
commit
99339dd445
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ func runfinq() {
|
||||
// address of a local variable.
|
||||
// The argument finalizer must be a function that takes a single argument
|
||||
// to which obj's type can be assigned, and can have arbitrary ignored return
|
||||
// values. If either of these is not true, SetFinalizer aborts the
|
||||
// values. If either of these is not true, SetFinalizer may abort the
|
||||
// program.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Finalizers are run in dependency order: if A points at B, both have
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user