qbit/go
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-21 23:04:39 -07:00
Code Releases Activity

faq: mercurial vs. git

Browse Source 
Fixes #4052.

R=golang-dev, bradfitz, iant, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6490092
This commit is contained in:
Rob Pike 2012-09-07 11:19:01 -07:00
parent 412c60f1fa
commit 91f2a34ddc
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
doc/go_faq.html
View File

@ -922,6 +922,32 @@ See the document
for more information about how to proceed. for more information about how to proceed.
</p> </p>
<h3 id="Why_does_the_project_use_Mercurial_and_not_git">
Why does the project use Mercurial and not git?</h3>
<p>
The Go project, hosted by Google Code at
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/go">code.google.com/p/go</a>,
uses Mercurial as its version control system.
When the project launched,
Google Code supported only Subversion and Mercurial.
Mercurial was a better choice because of its plugin mechanism
that allowed us to create the "codereview" plugin to connect
the project to the excellent code review tools at
<a href="http://codereview.appspot.com">codereview.appspot.com</a>.
</p>
<p>
Programmers who work
with the Go project's source rather than release downloads sometimes
ask for the project to switch to git.
That would be possible, but it would be a lot of work and
would also require reimplementing the codereview plugin.
Given that Mercurial works today, with code review support,
combined with the Go project's mostly linear, non-branching use of
version control, a switch to git doesn't seem worthwhile.
</p>
<h2 id="Pointers">Pointers and Allocation</h2> <h2 id="Pointers">Pointers and Allocation</h2>
<h3 id="pass_by_value"> <h3 id="pass_by_value">