mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-21 12:14:46 -07:00
faq: mercurial vs. git
Fixes #4052. R=golang-dev, bradfitz, iant, rsc CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/6490092
This commit is contained in:
parent
412c60f1fa
commit
91f2a34ddc
@ -922,6 +922,32 @@ See the document
|
||||
for more information about how to proceed.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="Why_does_the_project_use_Mercurial_and_not_git">
|
||||
Why does the project use Mercurial and not git?</h3>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
The Go project, hosted by Google Code at
|
||||
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/go">code.google.com/p/go</a>,
|
||||
uses Mercurial as its version control system.
|
||||
When the project launched,
|
||||
Google Code supported only Subversion and Mercurial.
|
||||
Mercurial was a better choice because of its plugin mechanism
|
||||
that allowed us to create the "codereview" plugin to connect
|
||||
the project to the excellent code review tools at
|
||||
<a href="http://codereview.appspot.com">codereview.appspot.com</a>.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Programmers who work
|
||||
with the Go project's source rather than release downloads sometimes
|
||||
ask for the project to switch to git.
|
||||
That would be possible, but it would be a lot of work and
|
||||
would also require reimplementing the codereview plugin.
|
||||
Given that Mercurial works today, with code review support,
|
||||
combined with the Go project's mostly linear, non-branching use of
|
||||
version control, a switch to git doesn't seem worthwhile.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="Pointers">Pointers and Allocation</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3 id="pass_by_value">
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user