1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-21 23:34:42 -07:00

go spec, effective go: cleanups

Removed most of the detailed examples about handing panics
from the go spec since it's now covered by Effective Go.

R=r, rsc, iant, ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4128058
This commit is contained in:
Robert Griesemer 2011-02-04 08:43:21 -08:00
parent 4a14bc524b
commit 76f3228520
2 changed files with 34 additions and 106 deletions

View File

@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ executions. Here's a silly example.
</p>
<pre>
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
for i := 0; i &lt; 5; i++ {
defer fmt.Printf("%d ", i)
}
</pre>
@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ for a min function that chooses the least of a list of integers:
func Min(a ...int) int {
min := int(^uint(0) >> 1) // largest int
for _, i := range a {
if i < min {
if i &lt; min {
min = i
}
}
@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ suppresses the usual check for a <code>return</code> statement.
// A toy implementation of cube root using Newton's method.
func CubeRoot(x float64) float64 {
z := x/3 // Arbitrary intitial value
for i := 0; i < 1e6; i++ {
for i := 0; i &lt; 1e6; i++ {
prevz := z
z -= (z*z*z-x) / (3*z*z)
if veryClose(z, prevz) {
@ -2727,7 +2727,7 @@ inside a server without killing the other executing goroutines.
</p>
<pre>
func server(workChan <-chan *Work) {
func server(workChan &lt;-chan *Work) {
for work := range workChan {
go safelyDo(work)
}
@ -2751,7 +2751,16 @@ calling <code>recover</code> handles the condition completely.
</p>
<p>
Note that with this recovery pattern in place, the <code>do</code>
Because <code>recover</code> always returns <code>nil</code> unless called directly
from a deferred function, deferred code can call library routines that themselves
use <code>panic</code> and <code>recover</code> without failing. As an example,
the deferred function in <code>safelyDo</code> might call a logging function before
calling <code>recover</code>, and that logging code would run unaffected
by the panicking state.
</p>
<p>
With our recovery pattern in place, the <code>do</code>
function (and anything it calls) can get out of any bad situation
cleanly by calling <code>panic</code>. We can use that idea to
simplify error handling in complex software. Let's look at an

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!-- title The Go Programming Language Specification -->
<!-- subtitle Version of February 3, 2011 -->
<!-- subtitle Version of February 4, 2011 -->
<!--
TODO
@ -4646,13 +4646,6 @@ func panic(interface{})
func recover() interface{}
</pre>
<p>
<span class="alert">TODO: Most of this text could move to the respective
comments in <code>runtime.go</code> once the functions are implemented.
They are here, at least for now, for reference and discussion.
</span>
</p>
<p>
When a function <code>F</code> calls <code>panic</code>, normal
execution of <code>F</code> stops immediately. Any functions whose
@ -4668,117 +4661,43 @@ the argument to <code>panic</code>. This termination sequence is
called <i>panicking</i>.
</p>
<pre>
panic(42)
panic("unreachable")
panic(Error("cannot parse"))
</pre>
<p>
The <code>recover</code> function allows a program to manage behavior
of a panicking goroutine. Executing a <code>recover</code> call
inside a deferred function (but not any function called by it) stops
<i>inside</i> a deferred function (but not any function called by it) stops
the panicking sequence by restoring normal execution, and retrieves
the error value passed to the call of <code>panic</code>. If
<code>recover</code> is called outside the deferred function it will
not stop a panicking sequence. In this case, and when the goroutine
is not panicking, <code>recover</code> returns <code>nil</code>.
not stop a panicking sequence. In this case, or when the goroutine
is not panicking, or if the argument supplied to <code>panic</code>
was <code>nil</code>, <code>recover</code> returns <code>nil</code>.
</p>
<p>
If the function defined here,
The <code>protect</code> function in the example below invokes
the function argument <code>g</code> and protects callers from
run-time panics raised by <code>g</code>.
</p>
<pre>
func f(hideErrors bool) {
func protect(g func()) {
defer func() {
log.Println("done") // Println executes normally even in there is a panic
if x := recover(); x != nil {
println("panicking with value", x)
if !hideErrors {
panic(x) // go back to panicking
}
log.Printf("runtime panic: %v", x)
}
println("function returns normally") // executes only when hideErrors==true
}()
println("before")
p()
println("after") // never executes
}
func p() {
panic(3)
}
log.Println("start")
g()
}
</pre>
<p>
is called with <code>hideErrors=true</code>, it prints
</p>
<pre>
before
panicking with value 3
function returns normally
</pre>
<p>
and resumes normal execution in the function that called <code>f</code>. Otherwise, it prints
</p>
<pre>
before
panicking with value 3
</pre>
<p>
and, absent further <code>recover</code> calls, terminates the program.
</p>
<p>
Since deferred functions run before assigning the return values to the caller
of the deferring function, a deferred invocation of a function literal may modify the
invoking function's return values in the event of a panic. This permits a function to protect its
caller from panics that occur in functions it calls.
</p>
<pre>
func IsPrintable(s string) (ok bool) {
ok = true
defer func() {
if recover() != nil {
println("input is not printable")
ok = false
}
// Panicking has stopped; execution will resume normally in caller.
// The return value will be true normally, false if a panic occurred.
}()
panicIfNotPrintable(s) // will panic if validations fails.
return
}
</pre>
<!---
<p>
A deferred function that calls <code>recover</code> will see the
argument passed to <code>panic</code>. However, functions called
<i>from</i> the deferred function run normally, without behaving as
though they are panicking. This allows deferred code to run normally
in case recovery is necessary and guarantees that functions that manage
their own panics will not fail incorrectly. The function
</p>
<pre>
func g() {
s := ReadString()
defer func() {
if IsPrintable(s) {
println("finished processing", s)
} else {
println("finished processing unprintable string")
}
}()
Analyze(s)
}
</pre>
<p>
will not cause <code>IsPrintable</code> to print <code>"input is not printable"</code>
due to a <code>panic</code> triggered by the call to <code>Analyze</code>.
</p>
-->
<h3 id="Bootstrapping">Bootstrapping</h3>