mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-22 20:50:05 -07:00
[dev.typeparams] test: fix and update run.go's generics testing
In a late change to golang.org/cl/320609, while going back and forth on the meaning of the boolean result value for "checkFlags", I got one of the cases wrong. As a result, rather than testing both default flags and -G=3, we were (redundanly) testing default flags and -G=0. I ran into this because in my local dev tree, I'm using types2 even for -G=0, and evidently one of the recent types2 CLs changed the error message in fixedbugs/issue10975.go. Fortunately, there haven't been any other regressions despite lacking test coverage. So this CL cleans things up a bit: 1. Fixes that test to use -lang=go1.17, so types2 reports the old error message again. 2. Renames "checkFlags" to "validForGLevel" so the boolean result is harder to get wrong. 3. Removes the blanket deny list of all -m tests, and instead adds the specific tests that are still failing. This effectively extends -G=3 coverage to another 27 tests that were using -m but already passing, so we can make sure they don't regress again. 4. Adds a -f flag to force running tests even if they're in the deny list, to make it easier to test whether they're still failing without having to edit run.go. Change-Id: I058d9d90d81a92189e54c6f591d95fb617fede53 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/322612 Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c1e119d48
commit
6c9e1c58bc
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
// errorcheck
|
||||
// errorcheck -lang=go1.17
|
||||
|
||||
// Copyright 2015 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
||||
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
||||
|
109
test/run.go
109
test/run.go
@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ var (
|
||||
updateErrors = flag.Bool("update_errors", false, "update error messages in test file based on compiler output")
|
||||
runoutputLimit = flag.Int("l", defaultRunOutputLimit(), "number of parallel runoutput tests to run")
|
||||
generics = flag.String("G", "0,3", "a comma-separated list of -G compiler flags to test with")
|
||||
force = flag.Bool("f", false, "run expected-failure generics tests rather than skipping them")
|
||||
|
||||
shard = flag.Int("shard", 0, "shard index to run. Only applicable if -shards is non-zero.")
|
||||
shards = flag.Int("shards", 0, "number of shards. If 0, all tests are run. This is used by the continuous build.")
|
||||
@ -518,7 +519,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
close(t.donec)
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
if t.glevel > 0 {
|
||||
if t.glevel > 0 && !*force {
|
||||
// Files excluded from generics testing.
|
||||
filename := strings.Replace(t.goFileName(), "\\", "/", -1) // goFileName() uses \ on Windows
|
||||
if excludedFiles[filename] {
|
||||
@ -657,33 +658,37 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
Compile
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// checkFlags reports whether the current test configuration should
|
||||
// be skipped because flags (which should be an arguments list for
|
||||
// "go tool compile", not "go build") contains an excluded flag.
|
||||
// It will also update flags as appropriate.
|
||||
checkFlags := func(tool Tool) bool {
|
||||
if t.glevel > 0 {
|
||||
// validForGLevel reports whether the current test is valid to run
|
||||
// at the specified -G level. If so, it may update flags as
|
||||
// necessary to test with -G.
|
||||
validForGLevel := func(tool Tool) bool {
|
||||
if t.glevel == 0 {
|
||||
// default -G level; always valid
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, flag := range flags {
|
||||
if strings.Contains(flag, "-G") {
|
||||
// test provides explicit -G flag already
|
||||
if *verbose {
|
||||
fmt.Printf("excl\t%s\n", t.goFileName())
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch tool {
|
||||
case Build, Run:
|
||||
// ok; handled in goGcflags
|
||||
|
||||
case Compile:
|
||||
for _, flag := range flags {
|
||||
for _, pattern := range excludedFlags {
|
||||
if strings.Contains(flag, pattern) {
|
||||
if *verbose {
|
||||
fmt.Printf("excl\t%s\t%s\n", t.goFileName(), flags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true // cannot handle flag
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
flags = append(flags, fmt.Sprintf("-G=%v", t.glevel))
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
// we don't know how to add -G for this test yet
|
||||
if *verbose {
|
||||
fmt.Printf("excl\t%s\n", t.goFileName())
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -766,7 +771,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.err = fmt.Errorf("unimplemented action %q", action)
|
||||
|
||||
case "asmcheck":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(AsmCheck) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(AsmCheck) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -824,7 +829,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
case "errorcheck":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Compile) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Compile) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -858,7 +863,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.err = t.errorCheck(string(out), wantAuto, long, t.gofile)
|
||||
|
||||
case "compile":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Compile) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Compile) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -866,7 +871,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
_, t.err = compileFile(runcmd, long, flags)
|
||||
|
||||
case "compiledir":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Compile) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Compile) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -885,7 +890,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case "errorcheckdir", "errorcheckandrundir":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Compile) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Compile) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -934,7 +939,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
fallthrough
|
||||
|
||||
case "rundir":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Run) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Run) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -996,7 +1001,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case "runindir":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Run) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Run) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1039,7 +1044,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.checkExpectedOutput(out)
|
||||
|
||||
case "build":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Build) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Build) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1050,7 +1055,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case "builddir", "buildrundir":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Build) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Build) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1133,7 +1138,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case "buildrun":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Build) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Build) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1162,7 +1167,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.checkExpectedOutput(out)
|
||||
|
||||
case "run":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Run) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Run) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1209,7 +1214,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.checkExpectedOutput(out)
|
||||
|
||||
case "runoutput":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Run) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Run) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1248,7 +1253,7 @@ func (t *test) run() {
|
||||
t.checkExpectedOutput(out)
|
||||
|
||||
case "errorcheckoutput":
|
||||
if !checkFlags(Compile) {
|
||||
if !validForGLevel(Compile) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2015,15 +2020,6 @@ func overlayDir(dstRoot, srcRoot string) error {
|
||||
// checking are also excluded since these phases are not running yet.
|
||||
// We can get rid of this code once types2 is fully plugged in.
|
||||
|
||||
// For now we skip tests when we can't handle the file or some of the flags.
|
||||
// The first goal is to eliminate the excluded list; the second goal is to
|
||||
// eliminate the flag list.
|
||||
|
||||
var excludedFlags = []string{
|
||||
"-G", // skip redundant testing
|
||||
"-m",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// List of files that the compiler cannot errorcheck with the new typechecker (compiler -G option).
|
||||
// Temporary scaffolding until we pass all the tests at which point this map can be removed.
|
||||
var excludedFiles = map[string]bool{
|
||||
@ -2101,4 +2097,39 @@ var excludedFiles = map[string]bool{
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue7525e.go": true, // types2 reports init cycle error on different line - ok otherwise
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue7525.go": true, // types2 reports init cycle error on different line - ok otherwise
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue9691.go": true, // "cannot assign to int(.autotmp_4)" (probably irgen's fault)
|
||||
|
||||
// tests that rely on -m diagnostics, which currently differ with -G=3
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO(mdempsky): Triage, though most of the issues seem to fall into:
|
||||
// - Anonymous result parameters given different names (e.g., ~r0 vs ~r1)
|
||||
// - Some escape analysis diagnostics being printed without position information
|
||||
// - Some expressions printed differently (e.g., "int(100)" instead
|
||||
// of "100" or "&composite literal" instead of "&[4]int{...}").
|
||||
"closure3.go": true,
|
||||
"escape2.go": true,
|
||||
"escape2n.go": true,
|
||||
"escape4.go": true,
|
||||
"escape5.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_array.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_calls.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_field.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_iface.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_indir.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_level.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_map.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_param.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_slice.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_struct_param1.go": true,
|
||||
"escape_struct_param2.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue12006.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue13799.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue21709.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue24651a.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue24651b.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue27557.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue31573.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue37837.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue39292.go": true,
|
||||
"fixedbugs/issue7921.go": true,
|
||||
"inline.go": true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user