- added item to TODO list in go_spec

- filed a bug

R=r
OCL=15517
CL=15517

doc/go_spec.txt

@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ Open issues according to gri:
 [ ] iant suggests to use abstract/precise int for len(), cap() - good idea
     (issue: what happens in len() + const - what is the type?)
 [ ] Do composite literals create a new literal each time (gri thinks yes)
+[ ] should binary <- be at lowest precedence level? when is a send/receive non-blocking?
+[ ] consider syntactic notation for composite literals to make them parseable w/o type information
 -->
 
 Contents

test/bugs/bug103.go

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// errchk $G $D/$F.go
+
+// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+package main
+
+func f() /* no return type */ {}
+
+func main() {
+	x := f();  // should not compile
+}
+