mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-22 16:04:40 -07:00
cmd/compile: generalize fix for lvalue-init evaluation
The previous fix to ensure early evaluation of lvalue-init statements (CL 312632) added it after we'd already peeled away any array-OINDEX expressions. But those might have init statements too, so we need to do this earlier actually and perhaps more than once. Longer term, lvalue expressions shouldn't have init statements anyway. But rsc and I both spent a while looking into this earlier in the dev cycle and couldn't come up with anything reasonable. Fixes #45706. Change-Id: I2d19c5ba421b3f019c62eec45774c84cf04b30ef Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/313011 Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
768a39975d
commit
691e1b84c1
@ -322,6 +322,13 @@ func ascompatee(op ir.Op, nl, nr []ir.Node) []ir.Node {
|
||||
// Save subexpressions needed on left side.
|
||||
// Drill through non-dereferences.
|
||||
for {
|
||||
// If an expression has init statements, they must be evaluated
|
||||
// before any of its saved sub-operands (#45706).
|
||||
// TODO(mdempsky): Disallow init statements on lvalues.
|
||||
init := ir.TakeInit(l)
|
||||
walkStmtList(init)
|
||||
early.Append(init...)
|
||||
|
||||
switch ll := l.(type) {
|
||||
case *ir.IndexExpr:
|
||||
if ll.X.Type().IsArray() {
|
||||
@ -341,9 +348,6 @@ func ascompatee(op ir.Op, nl, nr []ir.Node) []ir.Node {
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
walkStmtList(l.Init())
|
||||
early.Append(ir.TakeInit(l)...)
|
||||
|
||||
var name *ir.Name
|
||||
switch l.Op() {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
@ -14,3 +14,12 @@ func g() {
|
||||
for i, *(arr[f()]) = range []int{} {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func h() {
|
||||
var x int
|
||||
var f func() int
|
||||
var arr []int
|
||||
var arr2 [][0]rune
|
||||
for arr[x], arr2[arr[f()]][x] = range "" {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user