diff --git a/src/cmd/dist/util.go b/src/cmd/dist/util.go index 0a419e465fe..e99375f5380 100644 --- a/src/cmd/dist/util.go +++ b/src/cmd/dist/util.go @@ -389,6 +389,10 @@ func xgetgoarm() string { // sense to auto-detect the setting. return "7" } + if goos == "windows" { + // windows/arm only works with ARMv7 executables. + return "7" + } if gohostarch != "arm" || goos != gohostos { // Conservative default for cross-compilation. return "5" diff --git a/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs.go b/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs.go index b630b610f10..bed4d5c1ba5 100644 --- a/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs.go +++ b/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs.go @@ -293,10 +293,15 @@ func Req(target module.Version, base []string, reqs Reqs) ([]module.Version, err } // First walk the base modules that must be listed. var min []module.Version + haveBase := map[string]bool{} for _, path := range base { + if haveBase[path] { + continue + } m := module.Version{Path: path, Version: max[path]} min = append(min, m) walk(m) + haveBase[path] = true } // Now the reverse postorder to bring in anything else. for i := len(postorder) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { @@ -370,10 +375,19 @@ func Upgrade(target module.Version, reqs Reqs, upgrade ...module.Version) ([]mod // reqs.Previous, but the methods of reqs must otherwise handle such versions // correctly. func Downgrade(target module.Version, reqs Reqs, downgrade ...module.Version) ([]module.Version, error) { - list, err := reqs.Required(target) + // Per https://research.swtch.com/vgo-mvs#algorithm_4: + // “To avoid an unnecessary downgrade to E 1.1, we must also add a new + // requirement on E 1.2. We can apply Algorithm R to find the minimal set of + // new requirements to write to go.mod.” + // + // In order to generate those new requirements, we need to identify versions + // for every module in the build list — not just reqs.Required(target). + list, err := BuildList(target, reqs) if err != nil { return nil, err } + list = list[1:] // remove target + max := make(map[string]string) for _, r := range list { max[r.Path] = r.Version @@ -406,6 +420,9 @@ func Downgrade(target module.Version, reqs Reqs, downgrade ...module.Version) ([ } added[m] = true if v, ok := max[m.Path]; ok && reqs.Max(m.Version, v) != v { + // m would upgrade an existing dependency — it is not a strict downgrade, + // and because it was already present as a dependency, it could affect the + // behavior of other relevant packages. exclude(m) return } @@ -422,6 +439,7 @@ func Downgrade(target module.Version, reqs Reqs, downgrade ...module.Version) ([ // is transient (we couldn't download go.mod), return the error from // Downgrade. Currently, we can't tell what kind of error it is. exclude(m) + return } for _, r := range list { add(r) @@ -433,8 +451,8 @@ func Downgrade(target module.Version, reqs Reqs, downgrade ...module.Version) ([ } } - var out []module.Version - out = append(out, target) + downgraded := make([]module.Version, 0, len(list)+1) + downgraded = append(downgraded, target) List: for _, r := range list { add(r) @@ -461,10 +479,14 @@ List: add(p) r = p } - out = append(out, r) + downgraded = append(downgraded, r) } - return out, nil + return BuildList(target, &override{ + target: target, + list: downgraded, + Reqs: reqs, + }) } type override struct { diff --git a/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go b/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go index 721cd9635c8..742e396e0dc 100644 --- a/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go +++ b/src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go @@ -28,10 +28,11 @@ D4: E2 F1 D5: E2 G1: C4 A2: B1 C4 D4 -build A: A B1 C2 D4 E2 F1 -upgrade* A: A B1 C4 D5 E2 F1 G1 -upgrade A C4: A B1 C4 D4 E2 F1 G1 -downgrade A2 D2: A2 C4 D2 +build A: A B1 C2 D4 E2 F1 +upgrade* A: A B1 C4 D5 E2 F1 G1 +upgrade A C4: A B1 C4 D4 E2 F1 G1 +build A2: A2 B1 C4 D4 E2 F1 G1 +downgrade A2 D2: A2 C4 D2 E2 F1 G1 name: trim A: B1 C2 @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ B2: D1 C: D2 D1: E2 D2: E1 -build A: A B1 C D2 E1 +build A: A B1 C D2 E1 upgrade A B2: A B2 C D2 E2 name: cross1R @@ -136,17 +137,17 @@ name: cross5 A: D1 D1: E2 D2: E1 -build A: A D1 E2 -upgrade* A: A D2 E2 -upgrade A D2: A D2 E2 +build A: A D1 E2 +upgrade* A: A D2 E2 +upgrade A D2: A D2 E2 upgradereq A D2: D2 E2 name: cross6 A: D2 D1: E2 D2: E1 -build A: A D2 E1 -upgrade* A: A D2 E2 +build A: A D2 E1 +upgrade* A: A D2 E2 upgrade A E2: A D2 E2 name: cross7 @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ B1: D1 B2: C2: D2: -build A: A B1 C1 D1 +build A: A B1 C1 D1 upgrade* A: A B2 C2 D2 name: simplify @@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ B4: B5.hidden: C2: C3: -build A: A B1 C1 +build A: A B1 C1 upgrade* A: A B4 C3 name: up2 @@ -206,15 +207,15 @@ B4: B5.hidden: C2: C3: -build A: A B5.hidden C1 +build A: A B5.hidden C1 upgrade* A: A B5.hidden C3 name: down1 A: B2 B1: C1 B2: C2 -build A: A B2 C2 -downgrade A C1: A B1 +build A: A B2 C2 +downgrade A C1: A B1 C1 name: down2 A: B2 E2 @@ -227,12 +228,51 @@ D2: B2 E2: D2 E1: F1: -downgrade A F1: A B1 E1 +build A: A B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 +downgrade A F1: A B1 C1 D1 E1 F1 + +# https://research.swtch.com/vgo-mvs#algorithm_4: +# “[D]owngrades are constrained to only downgrade packages, not also upgrade +# them; if an upgrade before downgrade is needed, the user must ask for it +# explicitly.” +# +# Here, downgrading B2 to B1 upgrades C1 to C2, and C2 does not depend on D2. +# However, C2 would be an upgrade — not a downgrade — so B1 must also be +# rejected. +name: downcross1 +A: B2 C1 +B1: C2 +B2: C1 +C1: D2 +C2: +D1: +D2: +build A: A B2 C1 D2 +downgrade A D1: A D1 + +# https://research.swtch.com/vgo-mvs#algorithm_4: +# “Unlike upgrades, downgrades must work by removing requirements, not adding +# them.” +# +# However, downgrading a requirement may introduce a new requirement on a +# previously-unrequired module. If each dependency's requirements are complete +# (“tidy”), that can't change the behavior of any other package whose version is +# not also being downgraded, so we should allow it. +name: downcross2 +A: B2 +B1: C1 +B2: D2 +C1: +D1: +D2: +build A: A B2 D2 +downgrade A D1: A B1 C1 D1 name: downcycle A: A B2 B2: A B1: +build A: A B2 downgrade A B1: A B1 # golang.org/issue/25542. @@ -240,6 +280,7 @@ name: noprev1 A: B4 C2 B2.hidden: C2: +build A: A B4 C2 downgrade A B2.hidden: A B2.hidden C2 name: noprev2 @@ -247,6 +288,7 @@ A: B4 C2 B2.hidden: B1: C2: +build A: A B4 C2 downgrade A B2.hidden: A B2.hidden C2 name: noprev3 @@ -254,6 +296,7 @@ A: B4 C2 B3: B2.hidden: C2: +build A: A B4 C2 downgrade A B2.hidden: A B2.hidden C2 # Cycles involving the target. @@ -264,9 +307,9 @@ A: B1 B1: A1 B2: A2 B3: A3 -build A: A B1 +build A: A B1 upgrade A B2: A B2 -upgrade* A: A B3 +upgrade* A: A B3 # golang.org/issue/29773: # Requirements of older versions of the target @@ -280,7 +323,7 @@ B2: A2 C1: A2 C2: D2: -build A: A B1 C1 D1 +build A: A B1 C1 D1 upgrade* A: A B2 C2 D2 # Cycles with multiple possible solutions. @@ -293,23 +336,23 @@ B2: C2 C1: C2: B2 build M: M A1 B2 C2 -req M: A1 B2 -req M A: A1 B2 -req M C: A1 C2 +req M: A1 B2 +req M A: A1 B2 +req M C: A1 C2 # Requirement minimization. name: req1 A: B1 C1 D1 E1 F1 B1: C1 E1 F1 -req A: B1 D1 +req A: B1 D1 req A C: B1 C1 D1 name: req2 A: G1 H1 G1: H1 H1: G1 -req A: G1 +req A: G1 req A G: G1 req A H: H1 @@ -326,7 +369,20 @@ M: Anone B1 D1 E1 B1: Cnone D1 E1: Fnone build M: M B1 D1 E1 -req M: B1 E1 +req M: B1 E1 + +name: reqdup +M: A1 B1 +A1: B1 +B1: +req M A A: A1 + +name: reqcross +M: A1 B1 C1 +A1: B1 C1 +B1: C1 +C1: +req M A B: A1 B1 ` func Test(t *testing.T) { diff --git a/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downadd_indirect.txt b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downadd_indirect.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..efc38f77c85 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downadd_indirect.txt @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +# This test illustrates a case where downgrading one module may upgrade another. +# Compare to the downcross2 test case in cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go. + +# The initial package import graph used in this test looks like: +# +# a ---- b ---- d +# +# The module dependency graph originally looks like: +# +# a ---- b.2 ---- d.2 +# +# b.1 ---- c.1 +# +# If we downgrade module d to version 1, we must downgrade b as well. +# If that downgrade selects b version 1, we will add a new dependency on module c. + +cp go.mod go.mod.orig +go mod tidy +cmp go.mod.orig go.mod + +go get -d example.com/d@v0.1.0 +go list -m all +stdout '^example.com/b v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/c v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/d v0.1.0 ' + +-- go.mod -- +module example.com/a + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/b v0.2.0 + +replace ( + example.com/b v0.1.0 => ./b1 + example.com/b v0.2.0 => ./b2 + example.com/c v0.1.0 => ./c + example.com/d v0.1.0 => ./d + example.com/d v0.2.0 => ./d +) +-- a.go -- +package a + +import _ "example.com/b" + +-- b1/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/c v0.1.0 +-- b1/b.go -- +package b + +import _ "example.com/c" + +-- b2/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/d v0.2.0 +-- b2/b.go -- +package b + +import _ "example.com/d" + +-- c/go.mod -- +module example.com/c + +go 1.15 + +-- c/c.go -- +package c + +-- d/go.mod -- +module example.com/d + +go 1.15 +-- d/d.go -- +package d diff --git a/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_artifact.txt b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_artifact.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b35d4c4fd03 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_artifact.txt @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ +# This test illustrates a case where an upgrade–downgrade–upgrade cycle can +# result in upgrades of otherwise-irrelevant dependencies. +# +# This case has no corresponding test in the mvs package, because it is an +# artifact that results from the composition of *multiple* MVS operations. + +# The initial package import graph used in the test looks like: +# +# m ---- a +# | | +# +----- b +# | | +# +----- c +# | +# +----- d +# +# b version 2 adds its own import of package d. +# +# The module dependency graph initially looks like: +# +# m ---- a.1 +# | | +# +----- b.1 +# | | +# +----- c.1 +# | +# +----- d.1 +# +# b.2 ---- c.2 +# | +# +------ d.2 +# | +# +------ e.1 +# +# If we upgrade module b to version 2, we will upgrade c and d and add a new +# dependency on e. If b version 2 is disallowed because of any of those +# dependencies, the other dependencies should not be upgraded as a side-effect. + +cp go.mod go.mod.orig +go mod tidy +cmp go.mod go.mod.orig + +go list -m all +stdout '^example.com/a v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/b v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/c v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/d v0.1.0 ' +! stdout '^example.com/e ' + +# b is imported by a, so the -u flag would normally upgrade it to v0.2.0. +# However, that would conflict with the explicit c@v0.1.0 constraint, +# so b must remain at v0.1.0. +# +# If we're not careful, we might temporarily add b@v0.2.0 and pull in its +# upgrades of module d and addition of module e, which are not relevant to +# b@v0.1.0 and should not be added to the main module's dependencies. + +go get -u -d example.com/a@latest example.com/c@v0.1.0 + +go list -m all +stdout '^example.com/a v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/b v0.1.0 ' +stdout '^example.com/c v0.1.0 ' + + # BUG: d should remain at v0.1.0, because it is not transitively imported by a + # with b@v0.1.0. Today, it is spuriously upgraded to v0.2.0. +stdout '^example.com/d v0.2.0 ' + + # BUG: e should not be added, because it is not transitively imported by a + # with b@v0.1.0. Today, it is spuriously added. +stdout '^example.com/e v0.1.0 ' + +-- go.mod -- +module example.com/m + +go 1.16 + +require ( + example.com/a v0.1.0 + example.com/b v0.1.0 + example.com/c v0.1.0 + example.com/d v0.1.0 +) + +replace ( + example.com/a v0.1.0 => ./a1 + example.com/b v0.1.0 => ./b1 + example.com/b v0.2.0 => ./b2 + example.com/c v0.1.0 => ./c + example.com/c v0.2.0 => ./c + example.com/d v0.1.0 => ./d + example.com/d v0.2.0 => ./d + example.com/e v0.1.0 => ./e +) +-- m.go -- +package m + +import ( + _ "example.com/a" + _ "example.com/b" + _ "example.com/c" + _ "example.com/d" +) + +-- a1/go.mod -- +module example.com/a + +go 1.16 + +require example.com/b v0.1.0 +-- a1/a.go -- +package a + +import _ "example.com/b" + +-- b1/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.16 + +require example.com/c v0.1.0 +-- b1/b.go -- +package b + +import _ "example.com/c" + +-- b2/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.16 + +require ( + example.com/c v0.2.0 + example.com/d v0.2.0 + example.com/e v0.1.0 +) +-- b2/b.go -- +package b + +import ( + "example.com/c" + "example.com/d" + "example.com/e" +) + +-- c/go.mod -- +module example.com/c + +go 1.16 +-- c/c.go -- +package c + +-- d/go.mod -- +module example.com/d + +go 1.16 +-- d/d.go -- +package d + +-- e/go.mod -- +module example.com/e + +go 1.16 +-- e/e.go -- +package e diff --git a/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_indirect.txt b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_indirect.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ced1dcd6b14 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_get_downup_indirect.txt @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +# This test illustrates a case where downgrading one module may upgrade another. +# Compare to the downcross1 test case in cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go. + +# The package import graph used in this test looks like: +# +# a ---- b +# \ \ +# \ \ +# ----- c ---- d +# +# The module dependency graph originally looks like: +# +# a ---- b.2 +# \ \ +# \ \ +# ----- c.1 ---- d.2 +# +# b.1 ---- c.2 +# +# If we downgrade module d to version 1, we must downgrade b as well. +# If that downgrade selects b version 1, we will upgrade module c to version 2. +# So 'go get d@1' should instead downgrade both b and c to "none". + +cp go.mod go.mod.orig +go mod tidy +cmp go.mod.orig go.mod + +go get -d example.com/d@v0.1.0 +go list -m all +! stdout '^example.com/b ' +! stdout '^example.com/c ' +stdout '^example.com/d v0.1.0 ' + +-- go.mod -- +module example.com/a + +go 1.15 + +require ( + example.com/b v0.2.0 + example.com/c v0.1.0 +) + +replace ( + example.com/b v0.1.0 => ./b1 + example.com/b v0.2.0 => ./b2 + example.com/c v0.1.0 => ./c1 + example.com/c v0.2.0 => ./c2 + example.com/d v0.1.0 => ./d + example.com/d v0.2.0 => ./d +) +-- a.go -- +package a + +import ( + _ "example.com/b" + _ "example.com/c" +) + +-- b1/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/c v0.2.0 +-- b1/b.go -- +package b + +import _ "example.com/c" + +-- b2/go.mod -- +module example.com/b + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/c v0.1.0 +-- b2/b.go -- +package b + +import _ "example.com/c" + +-- c1/go.mod -- +module example.com/c + +go 1.15 + +require example.com/d v0.2.0 +-- c1/c.go -- +package c + +-- c2/go.mod -- +module example.com/c + +go 1.15 +-- c2/c.go -- +package c + +-- d/go.mod -- +module example.com/d + +go 1.15 diff --git a/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_load_badchain.txt b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_load_badchain.txt index c0c382bfa63..32d9fb24d11 100644 --- a/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_load_badchain.txt +++ b/src/cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_load_badchain.txt @@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ go get: example.com/badchain/c@v1.0.0 updating to module declares its path as: badchain.example.com/c but was required as: example.com/badchain/c -- update-a-expected -- -go get: example.com/badchain/a@v1.0.0 updating to - example.com/badchain/a@v1.1.0 requires +go get: example.com/badchain/a@v1.1.0 requires example.com/badchain/b@v1.1.0 requires example.com/badchain/c@v1.1.0: parsing go.mod: module declares its path as: badchain.example.com/c diff --git a/src/runtime/asm_riscv64.s b/src/runtime/asm_riscv64.s index 31e324d6775..3d0349471a2 100644 --- a/src/runtime/asm_riscv64.s +++ b/src/runtime/asm_riscv64.s @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ TEXT callRet<>(SB), NOSPLIT, $40-0 MOV A1, 16(X2) MOV A3, 24(X2) MOV A2, 32(X2) - MOV $0, 40(X2) + MOV ZERO, 40(X2) CALL runtime·reflectcallmove(SB) RET diff --git a/src/runtime/cgo/linux_syscall.c b/src/runtime/cgo/linux_syscall.c index 56f3d67d8bf..59761c8b409 100644 --- a/src/runtime/cgo/linux_syscall.c +++ b/src/runtime/cgo/linux_syscall.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ typedef struct { #define SET_RETVAL(fn) \ uintptr_t ret = (uintptr_t) fn ; \ - if (ret == -1) { \ + if (ret == (uintptr_t) -1) { \ x->retval = (uintptr_t) errno; \ } else \ x->retval = ret