qbit/go
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-11 23:10:23 -07:00
Code Releases Activity

cmd/go/internal/mvs: add test cases for downgrade interaction with hidden versions

Browse Source 
For #36460

Change-Id: I889c4ece0d2caff7528cf437f89f7446dbd83955
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/294292
Trust: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bryan C. Mills 2021-02-18 20:20:12 -05:00
parent 9fe8ebf9b4
commit 2c4c189bba
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

53
src/cmd/go/internal/mvs/mvs_test.go
View File

@ -275,6 +275,59 @@ B1:
build A: A B2 build A: A B2
downgrade A B1: A B1 downgrade A B1: A B1
# Both B3 and C2 require D2.
# If we downgrade D to D1, then in isolation B3 would downgrade to B1,
# because B2 is hidden — B1 is the next-highest version that is not hidden.
# However, if we downgrade D, we will also downgrade C to C1.
# And C1 requires B2.hidden, and B2.hidden also meets our requirements:
# it is compatible with D1 and a strict downgrade from B3.
#
# BUG(?): B2.hidden does not require E1, so there is no need for E1
# to appear in the final build list. Nonetheless, there it is.
#
name: downhiddenartifact
A: B3 C2
A1: B3
B1: E1
B2.hidden:
B3: D2
C1: B2.hidden
C2: D2
D1:
D2:
build A1: A1 B3 D2
downgrade A1 D1: A1 B1 D1 E1
build A: A B3 C2 D2
downgrade A D1: A B2.hidden C1 D1 E1
# Both B3 and C3 require D2.
# If we downgrade D to D1, then in isolation B3 would downgrade to B1,
# and C3 would downgrade to C1.
# But C1 requires B2.hidden, and B1 requires C2.hidden, so we can't
# downgrade to either of those without pulling the other back up a little.
#
# B2.hidden and C2.hidden are both compatible with D1, so that still
# meets our requirements — but then we're in an odd state in which
# B and C have both been downgraded to hidden versions, without any
# remaining requirements to explain how those hidden versions got there.
#
# TODO(bcmills): Would it be better to force downgrades to land on non-hidden
# versions?
# In this case, that would remove the dependencies on B and C entirely.
#
name: downhiddencross
A: B3 C3
B1: C2.hidden
B2.hidden:
B3: D2
C1: B2.hidden
C2.hidden:
C3: D2
D1:
D2:
build A: A B3 C3 D2
downgrade A D1: A B2.hidden C2.hidden D1
# golang.org/issue/25542. # golang.org/issue/25542.
name: noprev1 name: noprev1
A: B4 C2 A: B4 C2