cmd/compile: fix "previous" position info for duplicate switch cases
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes #33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-08-05 14:12:01 -06:00
|
|
|
// errorcheck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
|
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
zero = iota
|
|
|
|
one
|
|
|
|
two
|
|
|
|
three
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const iii int = 0x3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func f(v int) {
|
|
|
|
switch v {
|
|
|
|
case zero, one:
|
test: re-enable most go/tests that were disabled because of types2 differences
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
2021-12-03 17:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
case two, one: // ERROR "previous case at LINE-1|duplicate case .*in.* switch"
|
cmd/compile: fix "previous" position info for duplicate switch cases
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes #33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-08-05 14:12:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case three:
|
test: re-enable most go/tests that were disabled because of types2 differences
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
2021-12-03 17:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
case 3: // ERROR "previous case at LINE-1|duplicate case .*in.* switch"
|
|
|
|
case iii: // ERROR "previous case at LINE-2|duplicate case .*in.* switch"
|
cmd/compile: fix "previous" position info for duplicate switch cases
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes #33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-08-05 14:12:01 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const b = "b"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var _ = map[string]int{
|
|
|
|
"a": 0,
|
|
|
|
b: 1,
|
test: re-enable most go/tests that were disabled because of types2 differences
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
2021-12-03 17:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
"a": 2, // ERROR "previous key at LINE-2|duplicate key.*in map literal"
|
|
|
|
"b": 3, // GC_ERROR "previous key at LINE-2|duplicate key.*in map literal"
|
|
|
|
"b": 4, // GC_ERROR "previous key at LINE-3|duplicate key.*in map literal"
|
cmd/compile: fix "previous" position info for duplicate switch cases
Because the Node AST represents references to declared objects (e.g.,
variables, packages, types, constants) by directly pointing to the
referred object, we don't have use-position info for these objects.
For switch statements with duplicate cases, we report back where the
first duplicate value appeared. However, due to the AST
representation, if the value was a declared constant, we mistakenly
reported the constant declaration position as the previous case
position.
This CL reports back against the 'case' keyword's position instead, if
there's no more precise information available to us.
It also refactors code to emit the same "previous at" error message
for duplicate values in map literals.
Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for the test case.
Fixes #33460.
Change-Id: Iec69542ccd4aad594dde8df02d1b880a422c5622
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/188901
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-08-05 14:12:01 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|