1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-24 09:40:08 -07:00
go/test/fixedbugs/issue7921.go

58 lines
2.2 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// +build !gcflags_noopt
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
// errorcheck -0 -m
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package foo
import "bytes"
// In order to get desired results, we need a combination of
// both escape analysis and inlining.
func bufferNotEscape() string {
// b itself does not escape, only its buf field will be
// copied during String() call, but object "handle" itself
// can be stack-allocated.
var b bytes.Buffer
b.WriteString("123")
b.Write([]byte{'4'}) // ERROR "\[\]byte literal does not escape$"
return b.String() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).String$" "string\(bytes.b.buf\[bytes.b.off:\]\) escapes to heap$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape2(xs []string) int { // ERROR "xs does not escape$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 64)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer literal does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 64\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
for _, x := range xs {
b.WriteString(x)
}
return b.Len() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Len$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape3(xs []string) string { // ERROR "xs does not escape$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 64)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer literal does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 64\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
for _, x := range xs {
b.WriteString(x)
b.WriteByte(',')
}
return b.String() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).String$" "string\(bytes.b.buf\[bytes.b.off:\]\) escapes to heap$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape4() []byte {
var b bytes.Buffer
b.Grow(64) // ERROR "bufferNoEscape4 ignoring self-assignment in bytes.b.buf = bytes.b.buf\[:bytes.m·3\]$" "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Grow$"
useBuffer(&b)
return b.Bytes() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Bytes$"
}
func bufferNoEscape5() { // ERROR "can inline bufferNoEscape5$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 128)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer literal does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 128\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
useBuffer(b)
}
//go:noinline
func useBuffer(b *bytes.Buffer) { // ERROR "b does not escape$"
b.WriteString("1234")
}