1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-24 14:10:03 -07:00
go/test/codegen/shift.go

368 lines
9.2 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// asmcheck
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package codegen
// ------------------ //
// constant shifts //
// ------------------ //
func lshConst64x64(v int64) int64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SLLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v << uint64(33)
}
func rshConst64Ux64(v uint64) uint64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint64(33)
}
func rshConst64x64(v int64) int64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRAI",-"OR",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint64(33)
}
func lshConst32x64(v int32) int32 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SLLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v << uint64(29)
}
func rshConst32Ux64(v uint32) uint32 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint64(29)
}
func rshConst32x64(v int32) int32 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRAI",-"OR",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint64(29)
}
func lshConst64x32(v int64) int64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SLLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v << uint32(33)
}
func rshConst64Ux32(v uint64) uint64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRLI",-"AND",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint32(33)
}
func rshConst64x32(v int64) int64 {
cmd/compile: optimise immediate operands with constants on riscv64 Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is all ones or all zeroes. In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules (Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely. Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount is a constant we can precompute the shift value. Arithmetic right shift sequences like: 117fc: 00100513 li a0,1 11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64 11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1 11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1 1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1 Are now a single srai instruction: 117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1 Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift): 1d560: 01100413 li s0,17 1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64 1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0 1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11 1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0 Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction: 1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11 This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits. Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689 Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au> Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
2021-09-17 00:53:11 -06:00
// riscv64:"SRAI",-"OR",-"SLTIU"
return v >> uint32(33)
}
// ------------------ //
// masked shifts //
// ------------------ //
func lshMask64x64(v int64, s uint64) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SLL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v << (s & 63)
}
func rshMask64Ux64(v uint64, s uint64) uint64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SRL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func rshMask64x64(v int64, s uint64) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SRA","OR","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func lshMask32x64(v int32, s uint64) int32 {
// ppc64:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// ppc64le:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// riscv64:"SLL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v << (s & 63)
}
func rshMask32Ux64(v uint32, s uint64) uint32 {
// ppc64:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// ppc64le:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// riscv64:"SRL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func rshMask32x64(v int32, s uint64) int32 {
// ppc64:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// ppc64le:"ISEL",-"ORN"
// riscv64:"SRA","OR","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func lshMask64x32(v int64, s uint32) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN"
// riscv64:"SLL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v << (s & 63)
}
func rshMask64Ux32(v uint64, s uint32) uint64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN"
// riscv64:"SRL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func rshMask64x32(v int64, s uint32) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SRA","OR","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> (s & 63)
}
func lshMask64x32Ext(v int64, s int32) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SLL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v << uint(s&63)
}
func rshMask64Ux32Ext(v uint64, s int32) uint64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SRL","AND","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> uint(s&63)
}
func rshMask64x32Ext(v int64, s int32) int64 {
// ppc64:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// ppc64le:"ANDCC",-"ORN",-"ISEL"
// riscv64:"SRA","OR","SLTIU"
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
return v >> uint(s&63)
}
// --------------- //
// signed shifts //
// --------------- //
// We do want to generate a test + panicshift for these cases.
func lshSigned(v8 int8, v16 int16, v32 int32, v64 int64, x int) {
// amd64:"TESTB"
_ = x << v8
// amd64:"TESTW"
_ = x << v16
// amd64:"TESTL"
_ = x << v32
// amd64:"TESTQ"
_ = x << v64
}
// We want to avoid generating a test + panicshift for these cases.
func lshSignedMasked(v8 int8, v16 int16, v32 int32, v64 int64, x int) {
// amd64:-"TESTB"
_ = x << (v8 & 7)
// amd64:-"TESTW"
_ = x << (v16 & 15)
// amd64:-"TESTL"
_ = x << (v32 & 31)
// amd64:-"TESTQ"
_ = x << (v64 & 63)
}
// ------------------ //
// bounded shifts //
// ------------------ //
func lshGuarded64(v int64, s uint) int64 {
if s < 64 {
// riscv64:"SLL","AND","SLTIU"
cmd/compile: optimize shift pairs and masks on s390x Optimize combinations of left and right shifts by a constant value into a 'rotate then insert selected bits [into zero]' instruction. Use the same instruction for contiguous masks since it has some benefits over 'and immediate' (not restricted to 32-bits, does not overwrite source register). To keep the complexity of this change under control I've only implemented 64 bit operations for now. There are a lot more optimizations that can be done with this instruction family. However, since their function overlaps with other instructions we need to be somewhat careful not to break existing optimization rules by creating optimization dead ends. This is particularly true of the load/store merging rules which contain lots of zero extensions and shifts. This CL does interfere with the store merging rules when an operand is shifted left before it is stored: binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b, x << 1) This is unfortunate but it's not critical and somewhat complex so I plan to fix that in a follow up CL. file before after Δ % addr2line 4117446 4117282 -164 -0.004% api 4945184 4942752 -2432 -0.049% asm 4998079 4991891 -6188 -0.124% buildid 2685158 2684074 -1084 -0.040% cgo 4553732 4553394 -338 -0.007% compile 19294446 19245070 -49376 -0.256% cover 4897105 4891319 -5786 -0.118% dist 3544389 3542785 -1604 -0.045% doc 3926795 3927617 +822 +0.021% fix 3302958 3293868 -9090 -0.275% link 6546274 6543456 -2818 -0.043% nm 4102021 4100825 -1196 -0.029% objdump 4542431 4548483 +6052 +0.133% pack 2482465 2416389 -66076 -2.662% pprof 13366541 13363915 -2626 -0.020% test2json 2829007 2761515 -67492 -2.386% trace 10216164 10219684 +3520 +0.034% vet 6773956 6773572 -384 -0.006% total 107124151 106917891 -206260 -0.193% Change-Id: I7591cce41e06867ba10a745daae9333513062746 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233317 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
2020-05-11 10:44:48 -06:00
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
// wasm:-"Select",-".*LtU"
return v << s
}
panic("shift too large")
}
func rshGuarded64U(v uint64, s uint) uint64 {
if s < 64 {
// riscv64:"SRL","AND","SLTIU"
cmd/compile: optimize shift pairs and masks on s390x Optimize combinations of left and right shifts by a constant value into a 'rotate then insert selected bits [into zero]' instruction. Use the same instruction for contiguous masks since it has some benefits over 'and immediate' (not restricted to 32-bits, does not overwrite source register). To keep the complexity of this change under control I've only implemented 64 bit operations for now. There are a lot more optimizations that can be done with this instruction family. However, since their function overlaps with other instructions we need to be somewhat careful not to break existing optimization rules by creating optimization dead ends. This is particularly true of the load/store merging rules which contain lots of zero extensions and shifts. This CL does interfere with the store merging rules when an operand is shifted left before it is stored: binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b, x << 1) This is unfortunate but it's not critical and somewhat complex so I plan to fix that in a follow up CL. file before after Δ % addr2line 4117446 4117282 -164 -0.004% api 4945184 4942752 -2432 -0.049% asm 4998079 4991891 -6188 -0.124% buildid 2685158 2684074 -1084 -0.040% cgo 4553732 4553394 -338 -0.007% compile 19294446 19245070 -49376 -0.256% cover 4897105 4891319 -5786 -0.118% dist 3544389 3542785 -1604 -0.045% doc 3926795 3927617 +822 +0.021% fix 3302958 3293868 -9090 -0.275% link 6546274 6543456 -2818 -0.043% nm 4102021 4100825 -1196 -0.029% objdump 4542431 4548483 +6052 +0.133% pack 2482465 2416389 -66076 -2.662% pprof 13366541 13363915 -2626 -0.020% test2json 2829007 2761515 -67492 -2.386% trace 10216164 10219684 +3520 +0.034% vet 6773956 6773572 -384 -0.006% total 107124151 106917891 -206260 -0.193% Change-Id: I7591cce41e06867ba10a745daae9333513062746 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233317 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
2020-05-11 10:44:48 -06:00
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
// wasm:-"Select",-".*LtU"
return v >> s
}
panic("shift too large")
}
func rshGuarded64(v int64, s uint) int64 {
if s < 64 {
// riscv64:"SRA","OR","SLTIU"
cmd/compile: optimize shift pairs and masks on s390x Optimize combinations of left and right shifts by a constant value into a 'rotate then insert selected bits [into zero]' instruction. Use the same instruction for contiguous masks since it has some benefits over 'and immediate' (not restricted to 32-bits, does not overwrite source register). To keep the complexity of this change under control I've only implemented 64 bit operations for now. There are a lot more optimizations that can be done with this instruction family. However, since their function overlaps with other instructions we need to be somewhat careful not to break existing optimization rules by creating optimization dead ends. This is particularly true of the load/store merging rules which contain lots of zero extensions and shifts. This CL does interfere with the store merging rules when an operand is shifted left before it is stored: binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b, x << 1) This is unfortunate but it's not critical and somewhat complex so I plan to fix that in a follow up CL. file before after Δ % addr2line 4117446 4117282 -164 -0.004% api 4945184 4942752 -2432 -0.049% asm 4998079 4991891 -6188 -0.124% buildid 2685158 2684074 -1084 -0.040% cgo 4553732 4553394 -338 -0.007% compile 19294446 19245070 -49376 -0.256% cover 4897105 4891319 -5786 -0.118% dist 3544389 3542785 -1604 -0.045% doc 3926795 3927617 +822 +0.021% fix 3302958 3293868 -9090 -0.275% link 6546274 6543456 -2818 -0.043% nm 4102021 4100825 -1196 -0.029% objdump 4542431 4548483 +6052 +0.133% pack 2482465 2416389 -66076 -2.662% pprof 13366541 13363915 -2626 -0.020% test2json 2829007 2761515 -67492 -2.386% trace 10216164 10219684 +3520 +0.034% vet 6773956 6773572 -384 -0.006% total 107124151 106917891 -206260 -0.193% Change-Id: I7591cce41e06867ba10a745daae9333513062746 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233317 Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
2020-05-11 10:44:48 -06:00
// s390x:-"RISBGZ",-"AND",-"LOCGR"
// wasm:-"Select",-".*LtU"
return v >> s
}
panic("shift too large")
}
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
func checkUnneededTrunc(tab *[100000]uint32, d uint64, v uint32, h uint16, b byte) (uint32, uint64) {
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
f := tab[byte(v)^b]
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
f += tab[byte(v)&b]
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
f += tab[byte(v)|b]
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
f += tab[uint16(v)&h]
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
f += tab[uint16(v)^h]
// ppc64le:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*RLWINM",-".*RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
f += tab[uint16(v)|h]
// ppc64le:-".*AND",-"RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*AND",-"RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
f += tab[v&0xff]
// ppc64le:-".*AND",".*CLRLSLWI"
// ppc64:-".*AND",".*CLRLSLWI"
f += 2 * uint32(uint16(d))
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
// ppc64le:-".*AND",-"RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-".*AND",-"RLDICR",".*CLRLSLDI"
g := 2 * uint64(uint32(d))
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
return f, g
}
func checkCombinedShifts(v8 uint8, v16 uint16, v32 uint32, x32 int32, v64 uint64) (uint8, uint16, uint32, uint64, int64) {
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
// ppc64le:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
// ppc64:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
f := (v8 & 0xF) << 2
// ppc64le:"CLRLSLWI"
// ppc64:"CLRLSLWI"
f += byte(v16) << 3
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
// ppc64le:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
// ppc64:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
g := (v16 & 0xFF) << 3
// ppc64le:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
// ppc64:-"AND","CLRLSLWI"
h := (v32 & 0xFFFFF) << 2
// ppc64le:"CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:"CLRLSLDI"
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
i := (v64 & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 5
// ppc64le:-"CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64:-"CLRLSLDI"
i += (v64 & 0xFFFFFFF) << 38
// ppc64le/power9:-"CLRLSLDI"
// ppc64/power9:-"CLRLSLDI"
i += (v64 & 0xFFFF00) << 10
// ppc64le/power9:-"SLD","EXTSWSLI"
// ppc64/power9:-"SLD","EXTSWSLI"
j := int64(x32+32) * 8
return f, g, h, i, j
cmd/compile: use combined shifts to improve array addressing on ppc64x This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages. These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA sections C.8.1 and C.8.2. Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented some matching. The following results were generated on power9. hash/crc32: CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56% CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53% crypto/rc4: RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1) RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1) crypto/sha1: Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1) Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1) There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the range of 5-15%. Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097 Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-08-31 07:43:40 -06:00
}
func checkWidenAfterShift(v int64, u uint64) (int64, uint64) {
// ppc64le:-".*MOVW"
f := int32(v >> 32)
// ppc64le:".*MOVW"
f += int32(v >> 31)
// ppc64le:-".*MOVH"
g := int16(v >> 48)
// ppc64le:".*MOVH"
g += int16(v >> 30)
// ppc64le:-".*MOVH"
g += int16(f >> 16)
// ppc64le:-".*MOVB"
h := int8(v >> 56)
// ppc64le:".*MOVB"
h += int8(v >> 28)
// ppc64le:-".*MOVB"
h += int8(f >> 24)
// ppc64le:".*MOVB"
h += int8(f >> 16)
return int64(h), uint64(g)
}
func checkShiftAndMask32(v []uint32) {
i := 0
// ppc64le: "RLWNM\t[$]24, R[0-9]+, [$]12, [$]19, R[0-9]+"
// ppc64: "RLWNM\t[$]24, R[0-9]+, [$]12, [$]19, R[0-9]+"
v[i] = (v[i] & 0xFF00000) >> 8
i++
// ppc64le: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]29, R[0-9]+"
// ppc64: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]29, R[0-9]+"
v[i] = (v[i] & 0xFF00) >> 6
i++
// ppc64le: "MOVW\tR0"
// ppc64: "MOVW\tR0"
v[i] = (v[i] & 0xFF) >> 8
i++
// ppc64le: "MOVW\tR0"
// ppc64: "MOVW\tR0"
v[i] = (v[i] & 0xF000000) >> 28
i++
// ppc64le: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]24, [$]31, R[0-9]+"
// ppc64: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]24, [$]31, R[0-9]+"
v[i] = (v[i] >> 6) & 0xFF
i++
// ppc64le: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]12, [$]19, R[0-9]+"
// ppc64: "RLWNM\t[$]26, R[0-9]+, [$]12, [$]19, R[0-9]+"
v[i] = (v[i] >> 6) & 0xFF000
i++
// ppc64le: "MOVW\tR0"
// ppc64: "MOVW\tR0"
v[i] = (v[i] >> 20) & 0xFF000
i++
// ppc64le: "MOVW\tR0"
// ppc64: "MOVW\tR0"
v[i] = (v[i] >> 24) & 0xFF00
i++
}
func checkMergedShifts32(a [256]uint32, b [256]uint64, u uint32, v uint32) {
//ppc64le: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]10, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]29, R[0-9]+"
//ppc64: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]10, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]29, R[0-9]+"
a[0] = a[uint8(v>>24)]
//ppc64le: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]11, R[0-9]+, [$]21, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
//ppc64: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]11, R[0-9]+, [$]21, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
b[0] = b[uint8(v>>24)]
//ppc64le: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]15, R[0-9]+, [$]21, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
//ppc64: -"CLRLSLDI", "RLWNM\t[$]15, R[0-9]+, [$]21, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
b[1] = b[(v>>20)&0xFF]
//ppc64le: -"SLD", "RLWNM\t[$]10, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
//ppc64: -"SLD", "RLWNM\t[$]10, R[0-9]+, [$]22, [$]28, R[0-9]+"
b[2] = b[v>>25]
}
cmd/compile: optimize multi-register shifts on amd64 amd64 can shift in bits from another register instead of filling with 0/1. This pattern is helpful when implementing 128 bit shifts or arbitrary length shifts. In the standard library, it shows up in pure Go math/big. Benchmarks results on amd64 with -tags=math_big_pure_go. name old time/op new time/op delta NonZeroShifts/1/shrVU-8 4.45ns ± 3% 4.39ns ± 1% -1.28% (p=0.000 n=30+27) NonZeroShifts/1/shlVU-8 4.13ns ± 4% 4.10ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.254 n=29+28) NonZeroShifts/2/shrVU-8 5.55ns ± 1% 5.63ns ± 2% +1.42% (p=0.000 n=28+29) NonZeroShifts/2/shlVU-8 5.70ns ± 2% 5.14ns ± 1% -9.82% (p=0.000 n=29+28) NonZeroShifts/3/shrVU-8 6.79ns ± 2% 6.35ns ± 2% -6.46% (p=0.000 n=28+29) NonZeroShifts/3/shlVU-8 6.69ns ± 1% 6.25ns ± 1% -6.60% (p=0.000 n=28+27) NonZeroShifts/4/shrVU-8 7.79ns ± 2% 7.06ns ± 2% -9.48% (p=0.000 n=30+30) NonZeroShifts/4/shlVU-8 7.82ns ± 1% 7.24ns ± 1% -7.37% (p=0.000 n=28+29) NonZeroShifts/5/shrVU-8 8.90ns ± 3% 7.93ns ± 1% -10.84% (p=0.000 n=29+26) NonZeroShifts/5/shlVU-8 8.68ns ± 1% 7.92ns ± 1% -8.76% (p=0.000 n=29+29) NonZeroShifts/10/shrVU-8 14.4ns ± 1% 12.3ns ± 2% -14.79% (p=0.000 n=28+29) NonZeroShifts/10/shlVU-8 14.1ns ± 1% 11.9ns ± 2% -15.55% (p=0.000 n=28+27) NonZeroShifts/100/shrVU-8 118ns ± 1% 96ns ± 3% -18.82% (p=0.000 n=30+29) NonZeroShifts/100/shlVU-8 120ns ± 2% 98ns ± 2% -18.46% (p=0.000 n=29+28) NonZeroShifts/1000/shrVU-8 1.10µs ± 1% 0.88µs ± 2% -19.63% (p=0.000 n=29+30) NonZeroShifts/1000/shlVU-8 1.10µs ± 2% 0.88µs ± 2% -20.28% (p=0.000 n=29+28) NonZeroShifts/10000/shrVU-8 10.9µs ± 1% 8.7µs ± 1% -19.78% (p=0.000 n=28+27) NonZeroShifts/10000/shlVU-8 10.9µs ± 2% 8.7µs ± 1% -19.64% (p=0.000 n=29+27) NonZeroShifts/100000/shrVU-8 111µs ± 2% 90µs ± 2% -19.39% (p=0.000 n=28+29) NonZeroShifts/100000/shlVU-8 113µs ± 2% 90µs ± 2% -20.43% (p=0.000 n=30+27) The assembly version is still faster, unfortunately, but the gap is narrowing. Speedup from pure Go to assembly: name old time/op new time/op delta NonZeroShifts/1/shrVU-8 4.39ns ± 1% 3.45ns ± 2% -21.36% (p=0.000 n=27+29) NonZeroShifts/1/shlVU-8 4.10ns ± 2% 3.47ns ± 3% -15.42% (p=0.000 n=28+30) NonZeroShifts/2/shrVU-8 5.63ns ± 2% 3.97ns ± 0% -29.40% (p=0.000 n=29+25) NonZeroShifts/2/shlVU-8 5.14ns ± 1% 3.77ns ± 2% -26.65% (p=0.000 n=28+26) NonZeroShifts/3/shrVU-8 6.35ns ± 2% 4.79ns ± 2% -24.52% (p=0.000 n=29+29) NonZeroShifts/3/shlVU-8 6.25ns ± 1% 4.42ns ± 1% -29.29% (p=0.000 n=27+26) NonZeroShifts/4/shrVU-8 7.06ns ± 2% 5.64ns ± 1% -20.05% (p=0.000 n=30+29) NonZeroShifts/4/shlVU-8 7.24ns ± 1% 5.34ns ± 2% -26.23% (p=0.000 n=29+29) NonZeroShifts/5/shrVU-8 7.93ns ± 1% 6.56ns ± 2% -17.26% (p=0.000 n=26+30) NonZeroShifts/5/shlVU-8 7.92ns ± 1% 6.27ns ± 1% -20.79% (p=0.000 n=29+25) NonZeroShifts/10/shrVU-8 12.3ns ± 2% 10.2ns ± 2% -17.21% (p=0.000 n=29+29) NonZeroShifts/10/shlVU-8 11.9ns ± 2% 10.5ns ± 2% -12.45% (p=0.000 n=27+29) NonZeroShifts/100/shrVU-8 95.9ns ± 3% 77.7ns ± 1% -19.00% (p=0.000 n=29+30) NonZeroShifts/100/shlVU-8 97.5ns ± 2% 66.8ns ± 2% -31.47% (p=0.000 n=28+30) NonZeroShifts/1000/shrVU-8 884ns ± 2% 705ns ± 1% -20.17% (p=0.000 n=30+28) NonZeroShifts/1000/shlVU-8 880ns ± 2% 590ns ± 1% -32.96% (p=0.000 n=28+25) NonZeroShifts/10000/shrVU-8 8.74µs ± 1% 7.34µs ± 3% -15.94% (p=0.000 n=27+30) NonZeroShifts/10000/shlVU-8 8.73µs ± 1% 6.00µs ± 1% -31.25% (p=0.000 n=27+28) NonZeroShifts/100000/shrVU-8 89.6µs ± 2% 75.5µs ± 2% -15.80% (p=0.000 n=29+29) NonZeroShifts/100000/shlVU-8 89.6µs ± 2% 68.0µs ± 3% -24.09% (p=0.000 n=27+30) Change-Id: I18f58d8f5513d737d9cdf09b8f9d14011ffe3958 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/297050 Trust: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2021-01-07 20:25:05 -07:00
// 128 bit shifts
func check128bitShifts(x, y uint64, bits uint) (uint64, uint64) {
s := bits & 63
ŝ := (64 - bits) & 63
// check that the shift operation has two commas (three operands)
// amd64:"SHRQ.*,.*,"
shr := x>>s | y<<ŝ
// amd64:"SHLQ.*,.*,"
shl := x<<s | y>>ŝ
return shr, shl
}