1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-26 07:17:59 -07:00
go/test/fixedbugs/issue7921.go

59 lines
2.2 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
// errorcheck -0 -m
cmd/compile/internal/inl: inline based on scoring when GOEXPERIMENT=newinliner This patch changes the inliner to use callsite scores when deciding to inline as opposed to looking only at callee cost/hairyness. For this to work, we have to relax the inline budget cutoff as part of CanInline to allow for the possibility that a given function might start off with a cost of N where N > 80, but then be called from a callsites whose score is less than 80. Once a given function F in package P has been approved by CanInline (based on the relaxed budget) it will then be emitted as part of the export data, meaning that other packages importing P will need to also need to compute callsite scores appropriately. For a function F that calls function G, if G is marked as potentially inlinable then the hairyness computation for F will use G's cost for the call to G as opposed to the default call cost; for this to work with the new scheme (given relaxed cost change described above) we use G's cost only if it falls below inlineExtraCallCost, otherwise just use inlineExtraCallCost. Included in this patch are a bunch of skips and workarounds to selected 'errorcheck' tests in the <GOROOT>/test directory to deal with the additional "can inline" messages emitted when the new inliner is turned on. Change-Id: I9be5f8cd0cd8676beb4296faf80d2f6be7246335 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/519197 LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
2023-08-11 07:40:31 -06:00
//go:build !gcflags_noopt && !goexperiment.newinliner
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package foo
import "bytes"
// In order to get desired results, we need a combination of
// both escape analysis and inlining.
func bufferNotEscape() string {
// b itself does not escape, only its buf field will be
// copied during String() call, but object "handle" itself
// can be stack-allocated.
var b bytes.Buffer
b.WriteString("123")
b.Write([]byte{'4'}) // ERROR "\[\]byte{...} does not escape$"
return b.String() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).String$" "string\(bytes.b.buf\[bytes.b.off:\]\) escapes to heap$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape2(xs []string) int { // ERROR "xs does not escape$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 64)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer{...} does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 64\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
for _, x := range xs {
b.WriteString(x)
}
return b.Len() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Len$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape3(xs []string) string { // ERROR "xs does not escape$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 64)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer{...} does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 64\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
for _, x := range xs {
b.WriteString(x)
b.WriteByte(',')
}
return b.String() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).String$" "string\(bytes.b.buf\[bytes.b.off:\]\) escapes to heap$"
bytes: remove bootstrap array from Buffer Rationale: small buffer optimization does not work and it has made things slower since 2014. Until we can make it work, we should prefer simpler code that also turns out to be more efficient. With this change, it's possible to use NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, bootstrapSize)) to get the desired stack-allocated initial buffer since escape analysis can prove the created slice to be non-escaping. New implementation key points: - Zero value bytes.Buffer performs better than before - You can have a truly stack-allocated buffer, and it's not even limited to 64 bytes - The unsafe.Sizeof(bytes.Buffer{}) is reduced significantly - Empty writes don't cause allocations Buffer benchmarks from bytes package: name old time/op new time/op delta ReadString-8 9.20µs ± 1% 9.22µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.148 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 28.1µs ± 0% 26.2µs ± 0% -6.78% (p=0.000 n=10+10) WriteRune-8 64.9µs ± 0% 65.0µs ± 0% +0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 469µs ± 0% 461µs ± 0% -1.76% (p=0.000 n=9+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 108µs ± 0% 108µs ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old speed new speed delta ReadString-8 3.56GB/s ± 1% 3.55GB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.165 n=10+10) WriteByte-8 146MB/s ± 0% 156MB/s ± 0% +7.26% (p=0.000 n=9+10) WriteRune-8 189MB/s ± 0% 189MB/s ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ReadString-8 32.8kB ± 0% 32.8kB ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 4.72kB ± 0% 4.67kB ± 0% -1.02% (p=0.000 n=10+10) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.44kB ± 0% 3.33kB ± 0% -3.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ReadString-8 1.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) WriteByte-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) WriteRune-8 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal) BufferNotEmptyWriteRead-8 3.00 ± 0% 3.00 ± 0% ~ (all equal) BufferFullSmallReads-8 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) The most notable thing in go1 benchmarks is reduced allocs in HTTPClientServer (-1 alloc): HTTPClientServer-8 64.0 ± 0% 63.0 ± 0% -1.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10) For more explanations and benchmarks see the referenced issue. Updates #7921 Change-Id: Ica0bf85e1b70fb4f5dc4f6a61045e2cf4ef72aa3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/133715 Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2018-09-06 04:28:17 -06:00
}
func bufferNoEscape4() []byte {
var b bytes.Buffer
b.Grow(64) // ERROR "bufferNoEscape4 ignoring self-assignment in bytes.b.buf = bytes.b.buf\[:bytes.m\]$" "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Grow$" `".+" escapes to heap`
useBuffer(&b)
return b.Bytes() // ERROR "inlining call to bytes.\(\*Buffer\).Bytes$"
}
func bufferNoEscape5() { // ERROR "can inline bufferNoEscape5$"
b := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, 128)) // ERROR "&bytes.Buffer{...} does not escape$" "make\(\[\]byte, 0, 128\) does not escape$" "inlining call to bytes.NewBuffer$"
useBuffer(b)
}
//go:noinline
func useBuffer(b *bytes.Buffer) { // ERROR "b does not escape$"
b.WriteString("1234")
}