2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
<!--{
|
|
|
|
|
"Title": "Diagnostics",
|
|
|
|
|
"Template": true
|
|
|
|
|
}-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
The Go ecosystem provides a large suite of APIs and tools to
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose logic and performance problems in Go programs. This page
|
|
|
|
|
summarizes the available tools and helps Go users pick the right one
|
|
|
|
|
for their specific problem.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnostics solutions can be categorized into the following groups:
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
2017-09-12 06:20:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
<li><strong>Profiling</strong>: Profiling tools analyze the complexity and costs of a
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
Go program such as its memory usage and frequently called
|
|
|
|
|
functions to identify the expensive sections of a Go program.</li>
|
2017-09-12 06:20:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
<li><strong>Tracing</strong>: Tracing is a way to instrument code to analyze latency
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throughout the lifecycle of a call or user request. Traces provide an
|
|
|
|
|
overview of how much latency each component contributes to the overall
|
|
|
|
|
latency in a system. Traces can span multiple Go processes.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><strong>Debugging</strong>: Debugging allows us to pause a Go program and examine
|
|
|
|
|
its execution. Program state and flow can be verified with debugging.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><strong>Runtime statistics and events</strong>: Collection and analysis of runtime stats and events
|
|
|
|
|
provides a high-level overview of the health of Go programs. Spikes/dips of metrics
|
|
|
|
|
helps us to identify changes in throughput, utilization, and performance.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Some diagnostics tools may interfere with each other. For example, precise
|
|
|
|
|
memory profiling skews CPU profiles and goroutine blocking profiling affects scheduler
|
|
|
|
|
trace. Use tools in isolation to get more precise info.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="profiling">Profiling</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Profiling is useful for identifying expensive or frequently called sections
|
|
|
|
|
of code. The Go runtime provides <a href="https://golang.org/pkg/runtime/pprof/">
|
|
|
|
|
profiling data</a> in the format expected by the
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/google/pprof/blob/master/doc/pprof.md">pprof visualization tool</a>.
|
|
|
|
|
The profiling data can be collected during testing
|
|
|
|
|
via <code>go test</code> or endpoints made available from the <a href="/pkg/net/http/pprof/">
|
|
|
|
|
net/http/pprof</a> package. Users need to collect the profiling data and use pprof tools to filter
|
|
|
|
|
and visualize the top code paths.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Predefined profiles provided by the <a href="/pkg/runtime/pprof">runtime/pprof</a> package:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>cpu</strong>: CPU profile determines where a program spends
|
|
|
|
|
its time while actively consuming CPU cycles (as opposed to while sleeping or waiting for I/O).
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>heap</strong>: Heap profile reports memory allocation samples;
|
|
|
|
|
used to monitor current and historical memory usage, and to check for memory leaks.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>threadcreate</strong>: Thread creation profile reports the sections
|
|
|
|
|
of the program that lead the creation of new OS threads.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>goroutine</strong>: Goroutine profile reports the stack traces of all current goroutines.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>block</strong>: Block profile shows where goroutines block waiting on synchronization
|
|
|
|
|
primitives (including timer channels). Block profile is not enabled by default;
|
|
|
|
|
use <code>runtime.SetBlockProfileRate</code> to enable it.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>mutex</strong>: Mutex profile reports the lock contentions. When you think your
|
|
|
|
|
CPU is not fully utilized due to a mutex contention, use this profile. Mutex profile
|
|
|
|
|
is not enabled by default, see <code>runtime.SetMutexProfileFraction</code> to enable it.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>What other profilers can I use to profile Go programs?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
On Linux, <a href="https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial">perf tools</a>
|
|
|
|
|
can be used for profiling Go programs. Perf can profile
|
|
|
|
|
and unwind cgo/SWIG code and kernel, so it can be useful to get insights into
|
|
|
|
|
native/kernel performance bottlenecks. On macOS,
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/InstrumentsUserGuide/">Instruments</a>
|
|
|
|
|
suite can be used profile Go programs.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Can I profile my production services?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Yes. It is safe to profile programs in production, but enabling
|
|
|
|
|
some profiles (e.g. the CPU profile) adds cost. You should expect to
|
|
|
|
|
see performance downgrade. The performance penalty can be estimated
|
|
|
|
|
by measuring the overhead of the profiler before turning it on in
|
|
|
|
|
production.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
You may want to periodically profile your production services.
|
2017-09-09 02:36:25 -06:00
|
|
|
|
Especially in a system with many replicas of a single process, selecting
|
|
|
|
|
a random replica periodically is a safe option.
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
Select a production process, profile it for
|
|
|
|
|
X seconds for every Y seconds and save the results for visualization and
|
|
|
|
|
analysis; then repeat periodically. Results may be manually and/or automatically
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed to find problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Collection of profiles can interfere with each other,
|
|
|
|
|
so it is recommended to collect only a single profile at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>What are the best ways to visualize the profiling data?</strong>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
The Go tools provide text, graph, and <a href="http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cl-manual.html">callgrind</a>
|
|
|
|
|
visualization of the profile data via
|
|
|
|
|
<code><a href="https://github.com/google/pprof/blob/master/doc/pprof.md">go tool pprof</a></code>.
|
|
|
|
|
Read <a href="https://blog.golang.org/profiling-go-programs">Profiling Go programs</a>
|
|
|
|
|
to see them in action.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<img width="800" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/golangorg-assets/pprof-text.png">
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<small>Listing of the most expensive calls as text.</small>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<img width="800" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/golangorg-assets/pprof-dot.png">
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<small>Visualization of the most expensive calls as a graph.</small>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Weblist view displays the expensive parts of the source line by line in
|
|
|
|
|
an HTML page. In the following example, 530ms is spent in the
|
|
|
|
|
<code>runtime.concatstrings</code> and cost of each line is presented
|
|
|
|
|
in the listing.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<img width="800" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/golangorg-assets/pprof-weblist.png">
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<small>Visualization of the most expensive calls as weblist.</small>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Another way to visualize profile data is a <a href="https://github.com/uber/go-torch">flame graph</a>.
|
|
|
|
|
Flame graphs allow you to move in a specific ancestry path, so you can zoom
|
|
|
|
|
in/out specific sections of code more easily.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<img width="800" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/golangorg-assets/flame.png">
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
<small>Flame graphs offers visualization to spot the most expensive code-paths.</small>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Am I restricted to the built-in profiles?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally to what is provided by the runtime, Go users can create
|
|
|
|
|
their custom profiles via <a href="/pkg/runtime/pprof/#Profile">pprof.Profile</a>
|
|
|
|
|
and use the existing tools to examine them.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Can I serve the profiler handlers (/debug/pprof/...) on a different path and port?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. The <code>net/http/pprof</code> package registers its handlers to the default
|
|
|
|
|
mux by default, but you can also register them yourself by using the handlers
|
|
|
|
|
exported from the package.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
For example, the following example will serve the pprof.Profile
|
2017-11-21 09:00:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
handler on :7777 at /custom_debug_path/profile:
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
|
|
|
mux := http.NewServeMux()
|
|
|
|
|
mux.HandleFunc("/custom_debug_path/profile", pprof.Profile)
|
|
|
|
|
http.ListenAndServe(":7777", mux)
|
|
|
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="tracing">Tracing</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Tracing is a way to instrument code to analyze latency throughout the
|
|
|
|
|
lifecycle of a chain of calls. Go provides
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://godoc.org/golang.org/x/net/trace">golang.org/x/net/trace</a>
|
|
|
|
|
package as a minimal tracing backend per Go node and provides a minimal
|
|
|
|
|
instrumentation library with a simple dashboard. Go also provides
|
|
|
|
|
an execution tracer to trace the runtime events within an interval.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Tracing enables us to:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Instrument and profile application latency in a Go process.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Measure the cost of specific calls in a long chain of calls.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Figure out the utilization and performance improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
Bottlenecks are not always obvious without tracing data.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
In monolithic systems, it's relatively easy to collect diagnostic data
|
|
|
|
|
from the building blocks of a program. All modules live within one
|
|
|
|
|
process and share common resources to report logs, errors, and other
|
|
|
|
|
diagnostic information. Once your system grows beyond a single process and
|
|
|
|
|
starts to become distributed, it becomes harder to follow a call starting
|
|
|
|
|
from the front-end web server to all of its back-ends until a response is
|
|
|
|
|
returned back to the user. This is where distributed tracing plays a big
|
|
|
|
|
role to instrument and analyze your production systems.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed tracing is a way to instrument code to analyze latency throughout
|
|
|
|
|
the lifecycle of a user request. When a system is distributed and when
|
|
|
|
|
conventional profiling and debugging tools don’t scale, you might want
|
|
|
|
|
to use distributed tracing tools to analyze the performance of your user
|
|
|
|
|
requests and RPCs.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Distributed tracing enables us to:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Instrument and profile application latency in a large system.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Track all RPCs within the lifecycle of a user request and see integration issues
|
|
|
|
|
that are only visible in production.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Figure out performance improvements that can be applied to our systems.
|
|
|
|
|
Many bottlenecks are not obvious before the collection of tracing data.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The Go ecosystem provides various distributed tracing libraries per tracing system
|
|
|
|
|
and backend-agnostic ones.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Is there a way to automatically intercept each function call and create traces?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Go doesn’t provide a way to automatically intercept every function call and create
|
|
|
|
|
trace spans. You need to manually instrument your code to create, end, and annotate spans.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>How should I propagate trace headers in Go libraries?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
You can propagate trace identifiers and tags in the <code>context.Context</code>.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no canonical trace key or common representation of trace headers
|
|
|
|
|
in the industry yet. Each tracing provider is responsible for providing propagation
|
|
|
|
|
utilities in their Go libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<strong>What other low-level events from the standard library or
|
|
|
|
|
runtime can be included in a trace?</strong>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
The standard library and runtime are trying to expose several additional APIs
|
|
|
|
|
to notify on low level internal events. For example, httptrace.ClientTrace
|
|
|
|
|
provides APIs to follow low-level events in the life cycle of an outgoing request.
|
|
|
|
|
There is an ongoing effort to retrieve low-level runtime events from
|
|
|
|
|
the runtime execution tracer and allow users to define and record their user events.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="debugging">Debugging</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Debugging is the process of identifying why a program misbehaves.
|
|
|
|
|
Debuggers allow us to understand a program’s execution flow and current state.
|
|
|
|
|
There are several styles of debugging; this section will only focus on attaching
|
|
|
|
|
a debugger to a program and core dump debugging.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Go users mostly use the following debuggers:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://github.com/derekparker/delve">Delve</a>:
|
|
|
|
|
Delve is a debugger for the Go programming language. It has
|
|
|
|
|
support for Go’s runtime concepts and built-in types. Delve is
|
|
|
|
|
trying to be a fully featured reliable debugger for Go programs.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://golang.org/doc/gdb">GDB</a>:
|
|
|
|
|
Go provides GDB support via the standard Go compiler and Gccgo.
|
|
|
|
|
The stack management, threading, and runtime contain aspects that differ
|
|
|
|
|
enough from the execution model GDB expects that they can confuse the
|
|
|
|
|
debugger, even when the program is compiled with gccgo. Even though
|
|
|
|
|
GDB can be used to debug Go programs, it is not ideal and may
|
|
|
|
|
create confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>How well do debuggers work with Go programs?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
As of Go 1.9, the DWARF info generated by the gc compiler is not complete
|
|
|
|
|
and sometimes makes debugging harder. There is an ongoing effort to improve the
|
|
|
|
|
DWARF information to help the debuggers display more accurate information.
|
|
|
|
|
Until those improvements are in you may prefer to disable compiler
|
|
|
|
|
optimizations during development for more accuracy. To disable optimizations,
|
|
|
|
|
use the "-N -l" compiler flags. For example, the following command builds
|
|
|
|
|
a package with no compiler optimizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
|
|
|
$ go build -gcflags="-N -l"
|
|
|
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
As of Go 1.10, the Go binaries will have the required DWARF information
|
|
|
|
|
for accurate debugging. To enable the DWARF improvements, use the following
|
|
|
|
|
compiler flags and use GDB until Delve supports location lists:
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
|
|
|
$ go build -gcflags="-dwarflocationlists=true"
|
|
|
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>What’s the recommended debugger user interface?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Even though both delve and gdb provides CLIs, most editor integrations
|
|
|
|
|
and IDEs provides debugging-specific user interfaces. Please refer to
|
|
|
|
|
the <a href="/doc/editors.html">editors guide</a> to see the options
|
|
|
|
|
with debugger UI support.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Is it possible to do postmortem debugging with Go programs?</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
A core dump file is a file that contains the memory dump of a running
|
|
|
|
|
process and its process status. It is primarily used for post-mortem
|
|
|
|
|
debugging of a program and to understand its state
|
|
|
|
|
while it is still running. These two cases make debugging of core
|
|
|
|
|
dumps a good diagnostic aid to postmortem and analyze production
|
|
|
|
|
services. It is possible to obtain core files from Go programs and
|
|
|
|
|
use delve or gdb to debug, see the
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://golang.org/wiki/CoreDumpDebugging">core dump debugging</a>
|
|
|
|
|
page for a step-by-step guide.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="runtime">Runtime statistics and events</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
The runtime provides stats and reporting of internal events for
|
|
|
|
|
users to diagnose performance and utilization problems at the
|
|
|
|
|
runtime level.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
Users can monitor these stats to better understand the overall
|
|
|
|
|
health and performance of Go programs.
|
|
|
|
|
Some frequently monitored stats and states:
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><code><a href="/pkg/runtime/#ReadMemStats">runtime.ReadMemStats</a></code>
|
|
|
|
|
reports the metrics related to heap
|
|
|
|
|
allocation and garbage collection. Memory stats are useful for
|
|
|
|
|
monitoring how much memory resources a process is consuming,
|
|
|
|
|
whether the process can utilize memory well, and to catch
|
|
|
|
|
memory leaks.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><code><a href="/pkg/runtime/debug/#ReadGCStats">debug.ReadGCStats</a></code>
|
|
|
|
|
reads statistics about garbage collection.
|
|
|
|
|
It is useful to see how much of the resources are spent on GC pauses.
|
|
|
|
|
It also reports a timeline of garbage collector pauses and pause time percentiles.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><code><a href="/pkg/runtime/debug/#Stack">debug.Stack</a></code>
|
|
|
|
|
returns the current stack trace. Stack trace
|
|
|
|
|
is useful to see how many goroutines are currently running,
|
|
|
|
|
what they are doing, and whether they are blocked or not.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><code><a href="/pkg/runtime/debug/#WriteHeapDump">debug.WriteHeapDump</a></code>
|
|
|
|
|
suspends the execution of all goroutines
|
|
|
|
|
and allows you to dump the heap to a file. A heap dump is a
|
|
|
|
|
snapshot of a Go process' memory at a given time. It contains all
|
|
|
|
|
allocated objects as well as goroutines, finalizers, and more.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><code><a href="/pkg/runtime#NumGoroutine">runtime.NumGoroutine</a></code>
|
|
|
|
|
returns the number of current goroutines.
|
|
|
|
|
The value can be monitored to see whether enough goroutines are
|
2017-11-21 09:00:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
utilized, or to detect goroutine leaks.</li>
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="execution-tracer">Execution tracer</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Go comes with a runtime execution tracer to capture a wide range
|
|
|
|
|
of runtime events. Scheduling, syscall, garbage collections,
|
|
|
|
|
heap size, and other events are collected by runtime and available
|
|
|
|
|
for visualization by the go tool trace. Execution tracer is a tool
|
|
|
|
|
to detect latency and utilization problems. You can examine how well
|
|
|
|
|
the CPU is utilized, and when networking or syscalls are a cause of
|
|
|
|
|
preemption for the goroutines.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Tracer is useful to:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Understand how your goroutines execute.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Understand some of the core runtime events such as GC runs.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Identify poorly parallelized execution.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>However, it is not great for identifying hot spots such as
|
|
|
|
|
analyzing the cause of excessive memory or CPU usage.
|
|
|
|
|
Use profiling tools instead first to address them.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
|
|
<img width="800" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/golangorg-assets/tracer-lock.png">
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Above, the go tool trace visualization shows the execution started
|
|
|
|
|
fine, and then it became serialized. It suggests that there might
|
|
|
|
|
be lock contention for a shared resource that creates a bottleneck.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>See <a href="https://golang.org/cmd/trace/"><code>go tool trace</code></a>
|
|
|
|
|
to collect and analyze runtime traces.
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="godebug">GODEBUG</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Runtime also emits events and information if
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://golang.org/pkg/runtime/#hdr-Environment_Variables">GODEBUG</a>
|
|
|
|
|
environmental variable is set accordingly.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>GODEBUG=gctrace=1 prints garbage collector events at
|
2017-11-21 09:00:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
each collection, summarizing the amount of memory collected
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
and the length of the pause.</li>
|
2017-11-21 09:00:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
<li>GODEBUG=schedtrace=X prints scheduling events every X milliseconds.</li>
|
2017-09-05 14:15:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|