2016-03-01 15:57:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
|
|
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Garbage collector: type and heap bitmaps.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
cmd/internal/gc, runtime: use 1-bit bitmap for stack frames, data, bss
The bitmaps were 2 bits per pointer because we needed to distinguish
scalar, pointer, multiword, and we used the leftover value to distinguish
uninitialized from scalar, even though the garbage collector (GC) didn't care.
Now that there are no multiword structures from the GC's point of view,
cut the bitmaps down to 1 bit per pointer, recording just live pointer vs not.
The GC assumes the same layout for stack frames and for the maps
describing the global data and bss sections, so change them all in one CL.
The code still refers to 4-bit heap bitmaps and 2-bit "type bitmaps", since
the 2-bit representation lives (at least for now) in some of the reflect data.
Because these stack frame bitmaps are stored directly in the rodata in
the binary, this CL reduces the size of the 6g binary by about 1.1%.
Performance change is basically a wash, but using less memory,
and smaller binaries, and enables other bitmap reductions.
name old mean new mean delta
BenchmarkBinaryTree17 13.2s × (0.97,1.03) 13.0s × (0.99,1.01) -0.93% (p=0.005)
BenchmarkBinaryTree17-2 9.69s × (0.96,1.05) 9.51s × (0.96,1.03) -1.86% (p=0.001)
BenchmarkBinaryTree17-4 10.1s × (0.97,1.05) 10.0s × (0.96,1.05) ~ (p=0.141)
BenchmarkFannkuch11 4.35s × (0.99,1.01) 4.43s × (0.98,1.04) +1.75% (p=0.001)
BenchmarkFannkuch11-2 4.31s × (0.99,1.03) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.095)
BenchmarkFannkuch11-4 4.32s × (0.99,1.02) 4.38s × (0.98,1.04) +1.38% (p=0.008)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfEmpty 83.5ns × (0.97,1.10) 87.3ns × (0.92,1.11) +4.55% (p=0.014)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfEmpty-2 81.8ns × (0.98,1.04) 82.5ns × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.364)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfEmpty-4 80.9ns × (0.99,1.01) 82.6ns × (0.97,1.08) +2.12% (p=0.010)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfString 320ns × (0.95,1.04) 322ns × (0.97,1.05) ~ (p=0.368)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfString-2 303ns × (0.97,1.04) 304ns × (0.97,1.04) ~ (p=0.484)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfString-4 305ns × (0.97,1.05) 306ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.543)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfInt 311ns × (0.98,1.03) 319ns × (0.97,1.03) +2.63% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfInt-2 297ns × (0.98,1.04) 301ns × (0.97,1.04) +1.19% (p=0.023)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfInt-4 302ns × (0.98,1.02) 304ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.126)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfIntInt 554ns × (0.96,1.05) 554ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.975)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfIntInt-2 520ns × (0.98,1.03) 517ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.153)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfIntInt-4 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 525ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.597)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfPrefixedInt 433ns × (0.97,1.06) 434ns × (0.97,1.06) ~ (p=0.804)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfPrefixedInt-2 413ns × (0.98,1.04) 413ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.881)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfPrefixedInt-4 420ns × (0.97,1.03) 421ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.561)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfFloat 620ns × (0.99,1.03) 636ns × (0.97,1.03) +2.57% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfFloat-2 601ns × (0.98,1.02) 617ns × (0.98,1.03) +2.58% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkFmtFprintfFloat-4 613ns × (0.98,1.03) 626ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.15% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkFmtManyArgs 2.19µs × (0.96,1.04) 2.23µs × (0.97,1.02) +1.65% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkFmtManyArgs-2 2.08µs × (0.98,1.03) 2.10µs × (0.99,1.02) +0.79% (p=0.019)
BenchmarkFmtManyArgs-4 2.10µs × (0.98,1.02) 2.13µs × (0.98,1.02) +1.72% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkGobDecode 21.3ms × (0.97,1.05) 21.1ms × (0.97,1.04) -1.36% (p=0.025)
BenchmarkGobDecode-2 20.0ms × (0.97,1.03) 19.2ms × (0.97,1.03) -4.00% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkGobDecode-4 19.5ms × (0.99,1.02) 19.0ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.39% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkGobEncode 18.3ms × (0.95,1.07) 18.1ms × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.305)
BenchmarkGobEncode-2 16.8ms × (0.97,1.02) 16.4ms × (0.98,1.02) -2.79% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkGobEncode-4 15.4ms × (0.98,1.02) 15.4ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.465)
BenchmarkGzip 650ms × (0.98,1.03) 655ms × (0.97,1.04) ~ (p=0.075)
BenchmarkGzip-2 652ms × (0.98,1.03) 655ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.337)
BenchmarkGzip-4 656ms × (0.98,1.04) 653ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.291)
BenchmarkGunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.01) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.507)
BenchmarkGunzip-2 143ms × (1.00,1.01) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.313)
BenchmarkGunzip-4 143ms × (1.00,1.01) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.312)
BenchmarkHTTPClientServer 110µs × (0.98,1.03) 109µs × (0.99,1.02) -1.40% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkHTTPClientServer-2 154µs × (0.90,1.08) 149µs × (0.90,1.08) -3.43% (p=0.007)
BenchmarkHTTPClientServer-4 138µs × (0.97,1.04) 138µs × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.670)
BenchmarkJSONEncode 40.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 40.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.828)
BenchmarkJSONEncode-2 35.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 35.2ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.392)
BenchmarkJSONEncode-4 35.3ms × (0.98,1.03) 35.3ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.813)
BenchmarkJSONDecode 119ms × (0.97,1.02) 117ms × (0.98,1.02) -1.80% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkJSONDecode-2 115ms × (0.99,1.02) 114ms × (0.98,1.02) -1.18% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkJSONDecode-4 116ms × (0.98,1.02) 114ms × (0.98,1.02) -1.43% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkMandelbrot200 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.985)
BenchmarkMandelbrot200-2 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) 6.02ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.320)
BenchmarkMandelbrot200-4 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.799)
BenchmarkGoParse 8.63ms × (0.89,1.10) 8.58ms × (0.93,1.09) ~ (p=0.667)
BenchmarkGoParse-2 8.20ms × (0.97,1.04) 8.37ms × (0.97,1.04) +1.96% (p=0.001)
BenchmarkGoParse-4 8.00ms × (0.98,1.02) 8.14ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.75% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.01) 164ns × (0.98,1.04) +1.35% (p=0.011)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_32-2 161ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.185)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_32-4 161ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.19% (p=0.001)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_1K 540ns × (0.99,1.02) 566ns × (0.98,1.04) +4.98% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_1K-2 540ns × (0.99,1.01) 557ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.21% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy0_1K-4 541ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.26% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.98,1.04) 139ns × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.979)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_32-2 139ns × (0.99,1.04) 139ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.777)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_32-4 139ns × (0.98,1.04) 139ns × (0.99,1.04) ~ (p=0.771)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_1K 890ns × (0.99,1.03) 885ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.50% (p=0.004)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_1K-2 888ns × (0.99,1.01) 885ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.37% (p=0.004)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchEasy1_1K-4 890ns × (0.99,1.02) 884ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.70% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (0.99,1.01) 251ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.081)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_32-2 254ns × (0.99,1.04) 252ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.78% (p=0.027)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_32-4 253ns × (0.99,1.04) 252ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.70% (p=0.022)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.9µs × (0.99,1.01) 72.7µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.064)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_1K-2 74.1µs × (0.98,1.05) 72.9µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.61% (p=0.001)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_1K-4 73.6µs × (0.99,1.05) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.13% (p=0.007)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_32 3.88µs × (0.99,1.03) 3.92µs × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.143)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_32-2 3.89µs × (0.99,1.03) 3.93µs × (0.98,1.09) ~ (p=0.278)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_32-4 3.90µs × (0.99,1.05) 3.93µs × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.252)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_1K 118µs × (0.99,1.01) 117µs × (0.99,1.02) -0.54% (p=0.003)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_1K-2 118µs × (0.99,1.01) 118µs × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.581)
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_1K-4 118µs × (0.99,1.02) 117µs × (0.99,1.01) -0.54% (p=0.002)
BenchmarkRevcomp 991ms × (0.95,1.10) 989ms × (0.94,1.08) ~ (p=0.879)
BenchmarkRevcomp-2 978ms × (0.95,1.11) 962ms × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.257)
BenchmarkRevcomp-4 979ms × (0.96,1.07) 974ms × (0.96,1.11) ~ (p=0.678)
BenchmarkTemplate 141ms × (0.99,1.02) 145ms × (0.99,1.02) +2.75% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTemplate-2 135ms × (0.98,1.02) 138ms × (0.99,1.02) +2.34% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTemplate-4 136ms × (0.98,1.02) 140ms × (0.99,1.02) +2.71% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTimeParse 640ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.88% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTimeParse-2 640ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (1.00,1.00) -2.81% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTimeParse-4 640ns × (1.00,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.82% (p=0.000)
BenchmarkTimeFormat 730ns × (0.98,1.02) 731ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.767)
BenchmarkTimeFormat-2 709ns × (0.99,1.02) 707ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.347)
BenchmarkTimeFormat-4 717ns × (0.98,1.01) 718ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.793)
Change-Id: Ie779c47e912bf80eb918bafa13638bd8dfd6c2d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9406
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-04-27 20:45:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Stack, data, and bss bitmaps
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Stack frames and global variables in the data and bss sections are described
|
|
|
|
|
// by 1-bit bitmaps in which 0 means uninteresting and 1 means live pointer
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// to be visited during GC. The bits in each byte are consumed starting with
|
|
|
|
|
// the low bit: 1<<0, 1<<1, and so on.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Heap bitmap
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// The allocated heap comes from a subset of the memory in the range [start, used),
|
|
|
|
|
// where start == mheap_.arena_start and used == mheap_.arena_used.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The heap bitmap comprises 2 bits for each pointer-sized word in that range,
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// stored in bytes indexed backward in memory from start.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// That is, the byte at address start-1 holds the 2-bit entries for the four words
|
|
|
|
|
// start through start+3*ptrSize, the byte at start-2 holds the entries for
|
|
|
|
|
// start+4*ptrSize through start+7*ptrSize, and so on.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// In each 2-bit entry, the lower bit holds the same information as in the 1-bit
|
|
|
|
|
// bitmaps: 0 means uninteresting and 1 means live pointer to be visited during GC.
|
|
|
|
|
// The meaning of the high bit depends on the position of the word being described
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// in its allocated object. In all words *except* the second word, the
|
|
|
|
|
// high bit indicates that the object is still being described. In
|
|
|
|
|
// these words, if a bit pair with a high bit 0 is encountered, the
|
|
|
|
|
// low bit can also be assumed to be 0, and the object description is
|
|
|
|
|
// over. This 00 is called the ``dead'' encoding: it signals that the
|
|
|
|
|
// rest of the words in the object are uninteresting to the garbage
|
|
|
|
|
// collector.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// In the second word, the high bit is the GC ``checkmarked'' bit (see below).
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The 2-bit entries are split when written into the byte, so that the top half
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// of the byte contains 4 high bits and the bottom half contains 4 low (pointer)
|
|
|
|
|
// bits.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// This form allows a copy from the 1-bit to the 4-bit form to keep the
|
|
|
|
|
// pointer bits contiguous, instead of having to space them out.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The code makes use of the fact that the zero value for a heap bitmap
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// has no live pointer bit set and is (depending on position), not used,
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// not checkmarked, and is the dead encoding.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// These properties must be preserved when modifying the encoding.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Checkmarks
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// In a concurrent garbage collector, one worries about failing to mark
|
|
|
|
|
// a live object due to mutations without write barriers or bugs in the
|
|
|
|
|
// collector implementation. As a sanity check, the GC has a 'checkmark'
|
|
|
|
|
// mode that retraverses the object graph with the world stopped, to make
|
|
|
|
|
// sure that everything that should be marked is marked.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// In checkmark mode, in the heap bitmap, the high bit of the 2-bit entry
|
|
|
|
|
// for the second word of the object holds the checkmark bit.
|
|
|
|
|
// When not in checkmark mode, this bit is set to 1.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The smallest possible allocation is 8 bytes. On a 32-bit machine, that
|
|
|
|
|
// means every allocated object has two words, so there is room for the
|
|
|
|
|
// checkmark bit. On a 64-bit machine, however, the 8-byte allocation is
|
|
|
|
|
// just one word, so the second bit pair is not available for encoding the
|
|
|
|
|
// checkmark. However, because non-pointer allocations are combined
|
|
|
|
|
// into larger 16-byte (maxTinySize) allocations, a plain 8-byte allocation
|
|
|
|
|
// must be a pointer, so the type bit in the first word is not actually needed.
|
|
|
|
|
// It is still used in general, except in checkmark the type bit is repurposed
|
|
|
|
|
// as the checkmark bit and then reinitialized (to 1) as the type bit when
|
|
|
|
|
// finished.
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package runtime
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
|
"runtime/internal/atomic"
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
"runtime/internal/sys"
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
"unsafe"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitPointer = 1 << 0
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitMarked = 1 << 4 // TODO: Rename bitScan.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
heapBitsShift = 1 // shift offset between successive bitPointer or bitMarked entries
|
|
|
|
|
heapBitmapScale = sys.PtrSize * (8 / 2) // number of data bytes described by one heap bitmap byte
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// all mark/pointer bits in a byte
|
|
|
|
|
bitMarkedAll = bitMarked | bitMarked<<heapBitsShift | bitMarked<<(2*heapBitsShift) | bitMarked<<(3*heapBitsShift)
|
|
|
|
|
bitPointerAll = bitPointer | bitPointer<<heapBitsShift | bitPointer<<(2*heapBitsShift) | bitPointer<<(3*heapBitsShift)
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
)
|
2015-02-19 11:38:46 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// addb returns the byte pointer p+n.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nowritebarrier
|
2016-04-27 12:30:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func addb(p *byte, n uintptr) *byte {
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Note: wrote out full expression instead of calling add(p, n)
|
|
|
|
|
// to reduce the number of temporaries generated by the
|
|
|
|
|
// compiler for this trivial expression during inlining.
|
|
|
|
|
return (*byte)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(p)) + n))
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// subtractb returns the byte pointer p-n.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// subtractb is typically used when traversing the pointer tables referred to by hbits
|
|
|
|
|
// which are arranged in reverse order.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nowritebarrier
|
2016-04-27 12:30:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func subtractb(p *byte, n uintptr) *byte {
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Note: wrote out full expression instead of calling add(p, -n)
|
|
|
|
|
// to reduce the number of temporaries generated by the
|
|
|
|
|
// compiler for this trivial expression during inlining.
|
|
|
|
|
return (*byte)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(p)) - n))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// add1 returns the byte pointer p+1.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nowritebarrier
|
2016-04-27 12:30:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func add1(p *byte) *byte {
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: wrote out full expression instead of calling addb(p, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
// to reduce the number of temporaries generated by the
|
|
|
|
|
// compiler for this trivial expression during inlining.
|
|
|
|
|
return (*byte)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(p)) + 1))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// subtract1 returns the byte pointer p-1.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// subtract1 is typically used when traversing the pointer tables referred to by hbits
|
|
|
|
|
// which are arranged in reverse order.
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nowritebarrier
|
2015-08-07 11:34:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// nosplit because it is used during write barriers and must not be preempted.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func subtract1(p *byte) *byte {
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: wrote out full expression instead of calling subtractb(p, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
// to reduce the number of temporaries generated by the
|
|
|
|
|
// compiler for this trivial expression during inlining.
|
|
|
|
|
return (*byte)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(p)) - 1))
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// mHeap_MapBits is called each time arena_used is extended.
|
|
|
|
|
// It maps any additional bitmap memory needed for the new arena memory.
|
2015-06-07 20:59:29 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It must be called with the expected new value of arena_used,
|
|
|
|
|
// *before* h.arena_used has been updated.
|
|
|
|
|
// Waiting to update arena_used until after the memory has been mapped
|
|
|
|
|
// avoids faults when other threads try access the bitmap immediately
|
|
|
|
|
// after observing the change to arena_used.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nowritebarrier
|
2015-11-11 17:13:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h *mheap) mapBits(arena_used uintptr) {
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Caller has added extra mappings to the arena.
|
|
|
|
|
// Add extra mappings of bitmap words as needed.
|
|
|
|
|
// We allocate extra bitmap pieces in chunks of bitmapChunk.
|
|
|
|
|
const bitmapChunk = 8192
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-07 20:59:29 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n := (arena_used - mheap_.arena_start) / heapBitmapScale
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
n = round(n, bitmapChunk)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
n = round(n, sys.PhysPageSize)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if h.bitmap_mapped >= n {
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: use entire address space on 32 bit
In issue #13992, Russ mentioned that the heap bitmap footprint was
halved but that the bitmap size calculation hadn't been updated. This
presents the opportunity to either halve the bitmap size or double
the addressable virtual space. This CL doubles the addressable virtual
space. On 32 bit this can be tweaked further to allow the bitmap to
cover the entire 4GB virtual address space, removing a failure mode
if the kernel hands out memory with a too low address.
First, fix the calculation and double _MaxArena32 to cover 4GB virtual
memory space with the same bitmap size (256 MB).
Then, allow the fallback mode for the initial memory reservation
on 32 bit (or 64 bit with too little available virtual memory) to not
include space for the arena. mheap.sysAlloc will automatically reserve
additional space when the existing arena is full.
Finally, set arena_start to 0 in 32 bit mode, so that any address is
acceptable for subsequent (additional) reservations.
Before, the bitmap was always located just before arena_start, so
fix the two places relying on that assumption: Point the otherwise unused
mheap.bitmap to one byte after the end of the bitmap, and use it for
bitmap addressing instead of arena_start.
With arena_start set to 0 on 32 bit, the cgoInRange check is no longer a
sufficient check for Go pointers. Introduce and call inHeapOrStack to
check whether a pointer is to the Go heap or stack.
While we're here, remove sysReserveHigh which seems to be unused.
Fixes #13992
Change-Id: I592b513148a50b9d3967b5c5d94b86b3ec39acc2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20471
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-03-09 02:00:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
sysMap(unsafe.Pointer(h.bitmap-n), n-h.bitmap_mapped, h.arena_reserved, &memstats.gc_sys)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
h.bitmap_mapped = n
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBits provides access to the bitmap bits for a single heap word.
|
|
|
|
|
// The methods on heapBits take value receivers so that the compiler
|
|
|
|
|
// can more easily inline calls to those methods and registerize the
|
|
|
|
|
// struct fields independently.
|
|
|
|
|
type heapBits struct {
|
|
|
|
|
bitp *uint8
|
|
|
|
|
shift uint32
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// markBits provides access to the mark bit for an object in the heap.
|
|
|
|
|
// bytep points to the byte holding the mark bit.
|
|
|
|
|
// mask is a byte with a single bit set that can be &ed with *bytep
|
|
|
|
|
// to see if the bit has been set.
|
|
|
|
|
// *m.byte&m.mask != 0 indicates the mark bit is set.
|
|
|
|
|
// index can be used along with span information to generate
|
|
|
|
|
// the address of the object in the heap.
|
|
|
|
|
// We maintain one set of mark bits for allocation and one for
|
|
|
|
|
// marking purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
type markBits struct {
|
|
|
|
|
bytep *uint8
|
|
|
|
|
mask uint8
|
|
|
|
|
index uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) allocBitsForIndex(allocBitIndex uintptr) markBits {
|
|
|
|
|
whichByte := allocBitIndex / 8
|
|
|
|
|
whichBit := allocBitIndex % 8
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bytePtr := addb(s.allocBits, whichByte)
|
|
|
|
|
return markBits{bytePtr, uint8(1 << whichBit), allocBitIndex}
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-31 08:45:36 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// refillaCache takes 8 bytes s.allocBits starting at whichByte
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// and negates them so that ctz (count trailing zeros) instructions
|
|
|
|
|
// can be used. It then places these 8 bytes into the cached 64 bit
|
|
|
|
|
// s.allocCache.
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) refillAllocCache(whichByte uintptr) {
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bytes := (*[8]uint8)(unsafe.Pointer(addb(s.allocBits, whichByte)))
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
aCache := uint64(0)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[0])
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[1]) << (1 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[2]) << (2 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[3]) << (3 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[4]) << (4 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[5]) << (5 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[6]) << (6 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache |= uint64(bytes[7]) << (7 * 8)
|
|
|
|
|
s.allocCache = ^aCache
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// nextFreeIndex returns the index of the next free object in s at
|
|
|
|
|
// or after s.freeindex.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// There are hardware instructions that can be used to make this
|
|
|
|
|
// faster if profiling warrants it.
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) nextFreeIndex() uintptr {
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
sfreeindex := s.freeindex
|
|
|
|
|
snelems := s.nelems
|
|
|
|
|
if sfreeindex == snelems {
|
|
|
|
|
return sfreeindex
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sfreeindex > snelems {
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
throw("s.freeindex > s.nelems")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aCache := s.allocCache
|
2016-03-31 08:45:36 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitIndex := sys.Ctz64(aCache)
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for bitIndex == 64 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Move index to start of next cached bits.
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
sfreeindex = (sfreeindex + 64) &^ (64 - 1)
|
|
|
|
|
if sfreeindex >= snelems {
|
|
|
|
|
s.freeindex = snelems
|
|
|
|
|
return snelems
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
whichByte := sfreeindex / 8
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Refill s.allocCache with the next 64 alloc bits.
|
|
|
|
|
s.refillAllocCache(whichByte)
|
|
|
|
|
aCache = s.allocCache
|
2016-03-31 08:45:36 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitIndex = sys.Ctz64(aCache)
|
|
|
|
|
// nothing available in cached bits
|
|
|
|
|
// grab the next 8 bytes and try again.
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
result := sfreeindex + uintptr(bitIndex)
|
|
|
|
|
if result >= snelems {
|
|
|
|
|
s.freeindex = snelems
|
|
|
|
|
return snelems
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
s.allocCache >>= (bitIndex + 1)
|
|
|
|
|
sfreeindex = result + 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if sfreeindex%64 == 0 && sfreeindex != snelems {
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// We just incremented s.freeindex so it isn't 0.
|
|
|
|
|
// As each 1 in s.allocCache was encountered and used for allocation
|
|
|
|
|
// it was shifted away. At this point s.allocCache contains all 0s.
|
|
|
|
|
// Refill s.allocCache so that it corresponds
|
|
|
|
|
// to the bits at s.allocBits starting at s.freeindex.
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
whichByte := sfreeindex / 8
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
s.refillAllocCache(whichByte)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
s.freeindex = sfreeindex
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return result
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) isFree(index uintptr) bool {
|
|
|
|
|
whichByte := index / 8
|
|
|
|
|
whichBit := index % 8
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
byteVal := *addb(s.allocBits, whichByte)
|
|
|
|
|
return byteVal&uint8(1<<whichBit) == 0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) objIndex(p uintptr) uintptr {
|
|
|
|
|
byteOffset := p - s.base()
|
|
|
|
|
if byteOffset == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
return 0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if s.baseMask != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// s.baseMask is 0, elemsize is a power of two, so shift by s.divShift
|
|
|
|
|
return byteOffset >> s.divShift
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return uintptr(((uint64(byteOffset) >> s.divShift) * uint64(s.divMul)) >> s.divShift2)
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func markBitsForAddr(p uintptr) markBits {
|
|
|
|
|
s := spanOf(p)
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
objIndex := s.objIndex(p)
|
|
|
|
|
return s.markBitsForIndex(objIndex)
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) markBitsForIndex(objIndex uintptr) markBits {
|
|
|
|
|
whichByte := objIndex / 8
|
|
|
|
|
bitMask := uint8(1 << (objIndex % 8)) // low 3 bits hold the bit index
|
|
|
|
|
bytePtr := addb(s.gcmarkBits, whichByte)
|
|
|
|
|
return markBits{bytePtr, bitMask, objIndex}
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) markBitsForBase() markBits {
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return markBits{s.gcmarkBits, uint8(1), 0}
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// isMarked reports whether mark bit m is set.
|
|
|
|
|
func (m markBits) isMarked() bool {
|
|
|
|
|
return *m.bytep&m.mask != 0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// setMarked sets the marked bit in the markbits, atomically. Some compilers
|
|
|
|
|
// are not able to inline atomic.Or8 function so if it appears as a hot spot consider
|
|
|
|
|
// inlining it manually.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (m markBits) setMarked() {
|
|
|
|
|
// Might be racing with other updates, so use atomic update always.
|
|
|
|
|
// We used to be clever here and use a non-atomic update in certain
|
|
|
|
|
// cases, but it's not worth the risk.
|
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(m.bytep, m.mask)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// setMarkedNonAtomic sets the marked bit in the markbits, non-atomically.
|
|
|
|
|
func (m markBits) setMarkedNonAtomic() {
|
|
|
|
|
*m.bytep |= m.mask
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// clearMarked clears the marked bit in the markbits, atomically.
|
|
|
|
|
func (m markBits) clearMarked() {
|
|
|
|
|
// Might be racing with other updates, so use atomic update always.
|
|
|
|
|
// We used to be clever here and use a non-atomic update in certain
|
|
|
|
|
// cases, but it's not worth the risk.
|
|
|
|
|
atomic.And8(m.bytep, ^m.mask)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// clearMarkedNonAtomic clears the marked bit non-atomically.
|
|
|
|
|
func (m markBits) clearMarkedNonAtomic() {
|
|
|
|
|
*m.bytep ^= m.mask
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// markBitsForSpan returns the markBits for the span base address base.
|
|
|
|
|
func markBitsForSpan(base uintptr) (mbits markBits) {
|
|
|
|
|
if base < mheap_.arena_start || base >= mheap_.arena_used {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsForSpan: base out of range")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mbits = markBitsForAddr(base)
|
|
|
|
|
if mbits.mask != 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("markBitsForSpan: unaligned start")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return mbits
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// advance advances the markBits to the next object in the span.
|
|
|
|
|
func (m *markBits) advance() {
|
|
|
|
|
if m.mask == 1<<7 {
|
|
|
|
|
m.bytep = (*uint8)(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(m.bytep)) + 1))
|
|
|
|
|
m.mask = 1
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
m.mask = m.mask << 1
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
m.index++
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsForAddr returns the heapBits for the address addr.
|
|
|
|
|
// The caller must have already checked that addr is in the range [mheap_.arena_start, mheap_.arena_used).
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// nosplit because it is used during write barriers and must not be preempted.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsForAddr(addr uintptr) heapBits {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// 2 bits per work, 4 pairs per byte, and a mask is hard coded.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
off := (addr - mheap_.arena_start) / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: use entire address space on 32 bit
In issue #13992, Russ mentioned that the heap bitmap footprint was
halved but that the bitmap size calculation hadn't been updated. This
presents the opportunity to either halve the bitmap size or double
the addressable virtual space. This CL doubles the addressable virtual
space. On 32 bit this can be tweaked further to allow the bitmap to
cover the entire 4GB virtual address space, removing a failure mode
if the kernel hands out memory with a too low address.
First, fix the calculation and double _MaxArena32 to cover 4GB virtual
memory space with the same bitmap size (256 MB).
Then, allow the fallback mode for the initial memory reservation
on 32 bit (or 64 bit with too little available virtual memory) to not
include space for the arena. mheap.sysAlloc will automatically reserve
additional space when the existing arena is full.
Finally, set arena_start to 0 in 32 bit mode, so that any address is
acceptable for subsequent (additional) reservations.
Before, the bitmap was always located just before arena_start, so
fix the two places relying on that assumption: Point the otherwise unused
mheap.bitmap to one byte after the end of the bitmap, and use it for
bitmap addressing instead of arena_start.
With arena_start set to 0 on 32 bit, the cgoInRange check is no longer a
sufficient check for Go pointers. Introduce and call inHeapOrStack to
check whether a pointer is to the Go heap or stack.
While we're here, remove sysReserveHigh which seems to be unused.
Fixes #13992
Change-Id: I592b513148a50b9d3967b5c5d94b86b3ec39acc2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20471
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-03-09 02:00:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return heapBits{(*uint8)(unsafe.Pointer(mheap_.bitmap - off/4 - 1)), uint32(off & 3)}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsForSpan returns the heapBits for the span base address base.
|
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsForSpan(base uintptr) (hbits heapBits) {
|
2015-06-22 12:05:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if base < mheap_.arena_start || base >= mheap_.arena_used {
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsForSpan: base out of range")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return heapBitsForAddr(base)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsForObject returns the base address for the heap object
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// containing the address p, the heapBits for base,
|
|
|
|
|
// the object's span, and of the index of the object in s.
|
2015-03-03 14:55:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// If p does not point into a heap object,
|
|
|
|
|
// return base == 0
|
|
|
|
|
// otherwise return the base of the object.
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// refBase and refOff optionally give the base address of the object
|
|
|
|
|
// in which the pointer p was found and the byte offset at which it
|
|
|
|
|
// was found. These are used for error reporting.
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsForObject(p, refBase, refOff uintptr) (base uintptr, hbits heapBits, s *mspan, objIndex uintptr) {
|
2015-04-15 15:08:58 -06:00
|
|
|
|
arenaStart := mheap_.arena_start
|
|
|
|
|
if p < arenaStart || p >= mheap_.arena_used {
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-15 15:08:58 -06:00
|
|
|
|
off := p - arenaStart
|
|
|
|
|
idx := off >> _PageShift
|
2015-03-03 14:55:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// p points into the heap, but possibly to the middle of an object.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Consult the span table to find the block beginning.
|
2015-04-15 15:08:58 -06:00
|
|
|
|
s = h_spans[idx]
|
2016-04-28 09:21:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if s == nil || p < s.base() || p >= s.limit || s.state != mSpanInUse {
|
2015-02-24 10:25:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if s == nil || s.state == _MSpanStack {
|
|
|
|
|
// If s is nil, the virtual address has never been part of the heap.
|
|
|
|
|
// This pointer may be to some mmap'd region, so we allow it.
|
|
|
|
|
// Pointers into stacks are also ok, the runtime manages these explicitly.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The following ensures that we are rigorous about what data
|
|
|
|
|
// structures hold valid pointers.
|
2015-07-29 17:04:35 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if debug.invalidptr != 0 {
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Typically this indicates an incorrect use
|
|
|
|
|
// of unsafe or cgo to store a bad pointer in
|
|
|
|
|
// the Go heap. It may also indicate a runtime
|
|
|
|
|
// bug.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(austin): We could be more aggressive
|
|
|
|
|
// and detect pointers to unallocated objects
|
|
|
|
|
// in allocated spans.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
printlock()
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("runtime: pointer ", hex(p))
|
|
|
|
|
if s.state != mSpanInUse {
|
|
|
|
|
print(" to unallocated span")
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print(" to unused region of span")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-03-14 10:02:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("idx=", hex(idx), " span.base()=", hex(s.base()), " span.limit=", hex(s.limit), " span.state=", s.state, "\n")
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if refBase != 0 {
|
2015-09-21 09:49:52 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("runtime: found in object at *(", hex(refBase), "+", hex(refOff), ")\n")
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
gcDumpObject("object", refBase, refOff)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-09-18 09:55:31 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("found bad pointer in Go heap (incorrect use of unsafe or cgo?)")
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-23 14:28:15 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-15 15:08:58 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// If this span holds object of a power of 2 size, just mask off the bits to
|
|
|
|
|
// the interior of the object. Otherwise use the size to get the base.
|
|
|
|
|
if s.baseMask != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// optimize for power of 2 sized objects.
|
|
|
|
|
base = s.base()
|
|
|
|
|
base = base + (p-base)&s.baseMask
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
objIndex = (base - s.base()) >> s.divShift
|
2015-04-15 15:08:58 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// base = p & s.baseMask is faster for small spans,
|
|
|
|
|
// but doesn't work for large spans.
|
|
|
|
|
// Overall, it's faster to use the more general computation above.
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
base = s.base()
|
|
|
|
|
if p-base >= s.elemsize {
|
|
|
|
|
// n := (p - base) / s.elemsize, using division by multiplication
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
objIndex = uintptr(uint64(p-base) >> s.divShift * uint64(s.divMul) >> s.divShift2)
|
|
|
|
|
base += objIndex * s.elemsize
|
2015-03-04 09:34:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we know the actual base, compute heapBits to return to caller.
|
|
|
|
|
hbits = heapBitsForAddr(base)
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-03 14:55:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// prefetch the bits.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) prefetch() {
|
|
|
|
|
prefetchnta(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer((h.bitp))))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// next returns the heapBits describing the next pointer-sized word in memory.
|
|
|
|
|
// That is, if h describes address p, h.next() describes p+ptrSize.
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that next does not modify h. The caller must record the result.
|
2015-08-07 11:34:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// nosplit because it is used during write barriers and must not be preempted.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) next() heapBits {
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if h.shift < 3*heapBitsShift {
|
|
|
|
|
return heapBits{h.bitp, h.shift + heapBitsShift}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return heapBits{subtract1(h.bitp), 0}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// forward returns the heapBits describing n pointer-sized words ahead of h in memory.
|
|
|
|
|
// That is, if h describes address p, h.forward(n) describes p+n*ptrSize.
|
|
|
|
|
// h.forward(1) is equivalent to h.next(), just slower.
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that forward does not modify h. The caller must record the result.
|
|
|
|
|
// bits returns the heap bits for the current word.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) forward(n uintptr) heapBits {
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n += uintptr(h.shift) / heapBitsShift
|
|
|
|
|
return heapBits{subtractb(h.bitp, n/4), uint32(n%4) * heapBitsShift}
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The caller can test isMarked and isPointer by &-ing with bitMarked and bitPointer.
|
|
|
|
|
// The result includes in its higher bits the bits for subsequent words
|
|
|
|
|
// described by the same bitmap byte.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) bits() uint32 {
|
2016-01-21 11:44:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// The (shift & 31) eliminates a test and conditional branch
|
|
|
|
|
// from the generated code.
|
|
|
|
|
return uint32(*h.bitp) >> (h.shift & 31)
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// morePointers returns true if this word and all remaining words in this object
|
|
|
|
|
// are scalars.
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// h must not describe the second word of the object.
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) morePointers() bool {
|
2016-04-29 13:17:34 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return h.bits()&bitMarked != 0
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// isPointer reports whether the heap bits describe a pointer word.
|
2015-08-07 11:34:56 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// nosplit because it is used during write barriers and must not be preempted.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) isPointer() bool {
|
2016-04-29 13:17:34 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return h.bits()&bitPointer != 0
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// hasPointers reports whether the given object has any pointers.
|
2016-05-09 13:03:15 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It must be told how large the object at h is for efficiency.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// h must describe the initial word of the object.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) hasPointers(size uintptr) bool {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if size == sys.PtrSize { // 1-word objects are always pointers
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return (*h.bitp>>h.shift)&bitMarked != 0
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// isCheckmarked reports whether the heap bits have the checkmarked bit set.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It must be told how large the object at h is, because the encoding of the
|
|
|
|
|
// checkmark bit varies by size.
|
|
|
|
|
// h must describe the initial word of the object.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) isCheckmarked(size uintptr) bool {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return (*h.bitp>>h.shift)&bitPointer != 0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// All multiword objects are 2-word aligned,
|
|
|
|
|
// so we know that the initial word's 2-bit pair
|
|
|
|
|
// and the second word's 2-bit pair are in the
|
|
|
|
|
// same heap bitmap byte, *h.bitp.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return (*h.bitp>>(heapBitsShift+h.shift))&bitMarked != 0
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// setCheckmarked sets the checkmarked bit.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It must be told how large the object at h is, because the encoding of the
|
|
|
|
|
// checkmark bit varies by size.
|
|
|
|
|
// h must describe the initial word of the object.
|
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) setCheckmarked(size uintptr) {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(h.bitp, bitPointer<<h.shift)
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(h.bitp, bitMarked<<(heapBitsShift+h.shift))
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsBulkBarrier executes writebarrierptr_nostore
|
|
|
|
|
// for every pointer slot in the memory range [p, p+size),
|
2016-03-18 09:27:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// using the heap, data, or BSS bitmap to locate those pointer slots.
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// This executes the write barriers necessary after a memmove.
|
|
|
|
|
// Both p and size must be pointer-aligned.
|
2016-03-18 09:27:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The range [p, p+size) must lie within a single object.
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Callers should call heapBitsBulkBarrier immediately after
|
|
|
|
|
// calling memmove(p, src, size). This function is marked nosplit
|
|
|
|
|
// to avoid being preempted; the GC must not stop the goroutine
|
2015-06-11 07:49:38 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// between the memmove and the execution of the barriers.
|
runtime: fix callwritebarrier
Given a call frame F of size N where the return values start at offset R,
callwritebarrier was instructing heapBitsBulkBarrier to scan the block
of memory [F+R, F+R+N). It should only scan [F+R, F+N). The extra N-R
bytes scanned might lead into the next allocated block in memory.
Because the scan was consulting the heap bitmap for type information,
scanning into the next block normally "just worked" in the sense of
not crashing.
Scanning the extra N-R bytes of memory is a problem mainly because
it causes the GC to consider pointers that might otherwise not be
considered, leading it to retain objects that should actually be freed.
This is very difficult to detect.
Luckily, juju turned up a case where the heap bitmap and the memory
were out of sync for the block immediately after the call frame, so that
heapBitsBulkBarrier saw an obvious non-pointer where it expected a
pointer, causing a loud crash.
Why is there a non-pointer in memory that the heap bitmap records as
a pointer? That is more difficult to answer. At least one way that it
could happen is that allocations containing no pointers at all do not
update the heap bitmap. So if heapBitsBulkBarrier walked out of the
current object and into a no-pointer object and consulted those bitmap
bits, it would be misled. This doesn't happen in general because all
the paths to heapBitsBulkBarrier first check for the no-pointer case.
This may or may not be what happened, but it's the only scenario
I've been able to construct.
I tried for quite a while to write a simple test for this and could not.
It does fix the juju crash, and it is clearly an improvement over the
old code.
Fixes #10844.
Change-Id: I53982c93ef23ef93155c4086bbd95a4c4fdaac9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10317
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-19 20:58:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// The heap bitmap is not maintained for allocations containing
|
|
|
|
|
// no pointers at all; any caller of heapBitsBulkBarrier must first
|
|
|
|
|
// make sure the underlying allocation contains pointers, usually
|
|
|
|
|
// by checking typ.kind&kindNoPointers.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsBulkBarrier(p, size uintptr) {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if (p|size)&(sys.PtrSize-1) != 0 {
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsBulkBarrier: unaligned arguments")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-13 18:45:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if !writeBarrier.needed {
|
runtime: unwind stack barriers when writing above the current frame
Stack barriers assume that writes through pointers to frames above the
current frame will get write barriers, and hence these frames do not
need to be re-scanned to pick up these changes. For normal writes,
this is true. However, there are places in the runtime that use
typedmemmove to potentially write through pointers to higher frames
(such as mapassign1). Currently, typedmemmove does not execute write
barriers if the destination is on the stack. If there's a stack
barrier between the current frame and the frame being modified with
typedmemmove, and the stack barrier is not otherwise hit, it's
possible that the garbage collector will never see the updated pointer
and incorrectly reclaim the object.
Fix this by making heapBitsBulkBarrier (which lies behind typedmemmove
and its variants) detect when the destination is in the stack and
unwind stack barriers up to the point, forcing mark termination to
later rescan the effected frame and collect these pointers.
Fixes #11084. Might be related to #10240, #10541, #10941, #11023,
#11027 and possibly others.
Change-Id: I323d6cd0f1d29fa01f8fc946f4b90e04ef210efd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10791
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-06-05 12:49:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if !inheap(p) {
|
|
|
|
|
// If p is on the stack and in a higher frame than the
|
|
|
|
|
// caller, we either need to execute write barriers on
|
|
|
|
|
// it (which is what happens for normal stack writes
|
|
|
|
|
// through pointers to higher frames), or we need to
|
|
|
|
|
// force the mark termination stack scan to scan the
|
|
|
|
|
// frame containing p.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Executing write barriers on p is complicated in the
|
|
|
|
|
// general case because we either need to unwind the
|
|
|
|
|
// stack to get the stack map, or we need the type's
|
|
|
|
|
// bitmap, which may be a GC program.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Hence, we opt for forcing the re-scan to scan the
|
|
|
|
|
// frame containing p, which we can do by simply
|
|
|
|
|
// unwinding the stack barriers between the current SP
|
|
|
|
|
// and p's frame.
|
|
|
|
|
gp := getg().m.curg
|
2015-06-08 14:22:01 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if gp != nil && gp.stack.lo <= p && p < gp.stack.hi {
|
runtime: unwind stack barriers when writing above the current frame
Stack barriers assume that writes through pointers to frames above the
current frame will get write barriers, and hence these frames do not
need to be re-scanned to pick up these changes. For normal writes,
this is true. However, there are places in the runtime that use
typedmemmove to potentially write through pointers to higher frames
(such as mapassign1). Currently, typedmemmove does not execute write
barriers if the destination is on the stack. If there's a stack
barrier between the current frame and the frame being modified with
typedmemmove, and the stack barrier is not otherwise hit, it's
possible that the garbage collector will never see the updated pointer
and incorrectly reclaim the object.
Fix this by making heapBitsBulkBarrier (which lies behind typedmemmove
and its variants) detect when the destination is in the stack and
unwind stack barriers up to the point, forcing mark termination to
later rescan the effected frame and collect these pointers.
Fixes #11084. Might be related to #10240, #10541, #10941, #11023,
#11027 and possibly others.
Change-Id: I323d6cd0f1d29fa01f8fc946f4b90e04ef210efd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10791
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-06-05 12:49:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Run on the system stack to give it more
|
|
|
|
|
// stack space.
|
|
|
|
|
systemstack(func() {
|
|
|
|
|
gcUnwindBarriers(gp, p)
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
2016-03-18 09:27:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If p is a global, use the data or BSS bitmaps to
|
|
|
|
|
// execute write barriers.
|
|
|
|
|
for datap := &firstmoduledata; datap != nil; datap = datap.next {
|
|
|
|
|
if datap.data <= p && p < datap.edata {
|
|
|
|
|
bulkBarrierBitmap(p, size, p-datap.data, datap.gcdatamask.bytedata)
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
for datap := &firstmoduledata; datap != nil; datap = datap.next {
|
|
|
|
|
if datap.bss <= p && p < datap.ebss {
|
|
|
|
|
bulkBarrierBitmap(p, size, p-datap.bss, datap.gcbssmask.bytedata)
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: unwind stack barriers when writing above the current frame
Stack barriers assume that writes through pointers to frames above the
current frame will get write barriers, and hence these frames do not
need to be re-scanned to pick up these changes. For normal writes,
this is true. However, there are places in the runtime that use
typedmemmove to potentially write through pointers to higher frames
(such as mapassign1). Currently, typedmemmove does not execute write
barriers if the destination is on the stack. If there's a stack
barrier between the current frame and the frame being modified with
typedmemmove, and the stack barrier is not otherwise hit, it's
possible that the garbage collector will never see the updated pointer
and incorrectly reclaim the object.
Fix this by making heapBitsBulkBarrier (which lies behind typedmemmove
and its variants) detect when the destination is in the stack and
unwind stack barriers up to the point, forcing mark termination to
later rescan the effected frame and collect these pointers.
Fixes #11084. Might be related to #10240, #10541, #10941, #11023,
#11027 and possibly others.
Change-Id: I323d6cd0f1d29fa01f8fc946f4b90e04ef210efd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10791
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-06-05 12:49:27 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsBulkBarrier a tiny amount
This may be mostly noise but:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 6.03s × (0.98,1.02) 5.98s × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.42s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (0.99,1.02) -1.83% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 84.7ns × (0.99,1.01) 84.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.138)
FmtFprintfString 289ns × (0.98,1.02) 289ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.509)
FmtFprintfInt 280ns × (0.97,1.03) 272ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.003)
FmtFprintfIntInt 484ns × (0.98,1.02) 482ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.606)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.03) 393ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.064)
FmtFprintfFloat 573ns × (0.99,1.01) 569ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.69% (p=0.023)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.91µs × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.219)
GobDecode 15.4ms × (0.99,1.02) 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.05% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 12.0ms × (0.97,1.04) 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.458)
Gzip 652ms × (0.99,1.01) 653ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.743)
Gunzip 144ms × (0.99,1.01) 143ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.134)
HTTPClientServer 91.6µs × (0.99,1.01) 91.8µs × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.678)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (1.00,1.00) 32.0ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.334)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 110ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.315)
Mandelbrot200 6.04ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.04ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.596)
GoParse 6.72ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.74ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.577)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (0.99,1.01) 160ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.83% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 542ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.396)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.98,1.01) 137ns × (1.00,1.00) -2.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 892ns × (0.99,1.01) 891ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.631)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.01) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.76% (p=0.008)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.1µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.9µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.229)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.86µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.341)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.955)
Revcomp 954ms × (0.97,1.03) 955ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.894)
Template 133ms × (0.97,1.05) 129ms × (0.99,1.02) -2.50% (p=0.014)
TimeParse 629ns × (0.99,1.01) 626ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.106)
TimeFormat 663ns × (0.99,1.01) 660ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.231)
Change-Id: I580e03ed01b0629cb5eae4c4637618f20127f924
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9994
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-13 12:44:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
h := heapBitsForAddr(p)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < size; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsBulkBarrier a tiny amount
This may be mostly noise but:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 6.03s × (0.98,1.02) 5.98s × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.42s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (0.99,1.02) -1.83% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 84.7ns × (0.99,1.01) 84.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.138)
FmtFprintfString 289ns × (0.98,1.02) 289ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.509)
FmtFprintfInt 280ns × (0.97,1.03) 272ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.003)
FmtFprintfIntInt 484ns × (0.98,1.02) 482ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.606)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.03) 393ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.064)
FmtFprintfFloat 573ns × (0.99,1.01) 569ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.69% (p=0.023)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.91µs × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.219)
GobDecode 15.4ms × (0.99,1.02) 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.05% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 12.0ms × (0.97,1.04) 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.458)
Gzip 652ms × (0.99,1.01) 653ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.743)
Gunzip 144ms × (0.99,1.01) 143ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.134)
HTTPClientServer 91.6µs × (0.99,1.01) 91.8µs × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.678)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (1.00,1.00) 32.0ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.334)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 110ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.315)
Mandelbrot200 6.04ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.04ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.596)
GoParse 6.72ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.74ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.577)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (0.99,1.01) 160ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.83% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 542ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.396)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.98,1.01) 137ns × (1.00,1.00) -2.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 892ns × (0.99,1.01) 891ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.631)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.01) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.76% (p=0.008)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.1µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.9µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.229)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.86µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.341)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.955)
Revcomp 954ms × (0.97,1.03) 955ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.894)
Template 133ms × (0.97,1.05) 129ms × (0.99,1.02) -2.50% (p=0.014)
TimeParse 629ns × (0.99,1.01) 626ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.106)
TimeFormat 663ns × (0.99,1.01) 660ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.231)
Change-Id: I580e03ed01b0629cb5eae4c4637618f20127f924
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9994
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-13 12:44:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if h.isPointer() {
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
x := (*uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(p + i))
|
|
|
|
|
writebarrierptr_nostore(x, *x)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsBulkBarrier a tiny amount
This may be mostly noise but:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 6.03s × (0.98,1.02) 5.98s × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.42s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (0.99,1.02) -1.83% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 84.7ns × (0.99,1.01) 84.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.138)
FmtFprintfString 289ns × (0.98,1.02) 289ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.509)
FmtFprintfInt 280ns × (0.97,1.03) 272ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.003)
FmtFprintfIntInt 484ns × (0.98,1.02) 482ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.606)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.03) 393ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.064)
FmtFprintfFloat 573ns × (0.99,1.01) 569ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.69% (p=0.023)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.91µs × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.219)
GobDecode 15.4ms × (0.99,1.02) 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.05% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 12.0ms × (0.97,1.04) 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.458)
Gzip 652ms × (0.99,1.01) 653ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.743)
Gunzip 144ms × (0.99,1.01) 143ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.134)
HTTPClientServer 91.6µs × (0.99,1.01) 91.8µs × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.678)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (1.00,1.00) 32.0ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.334)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 110ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.315)
Mandelbrot200 6.04ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.04ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.596)
GoParse 6.72ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.74ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.577)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (0.99,1.01) 160ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.83% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 542ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.396)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.98,1.01) 137ns × (1.00,1.00) -2.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 892ns × (0.99,1.01) 891ns × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.631)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.01) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.76% (p=0.008)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.1µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.9µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.229)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.86µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.341)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.955)
Revcomp 954ms × (0.97,1.03) 955ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.894)
Template 133ms × (0.97,1.05) 129ms × (0.99,1.02) -2.50% (p=0.014)
TimeParse 629ns × (0.99,1.01) 626ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.106)
TimeFormat 663ns × (0.99,1.01) 660ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.231)
Change-Id: I580e03ed01b0629cb5eae4c4637618f20127f924
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9994
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-13 12:44:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
h = h.next()
|
2015-05-07 20:40:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-18 09:27:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// bulkBarrierBitmap executes write barriers for [p, p+size) using a
|
|
|
|
|
// 1-bit pointer bitmap. p is assumed to start maskOffset bytes into
|
|
|
|
|
// the data covered by the bitmap in bits.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// This is used by heapBitsBulkBarrier for writes to data and BSS.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
|
|
|
|
func bulkBarrierBitmap(p, size, maskOffset uintptr, bits *uint8) {
|
|
|
|
|
word := maskOffset / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
bits = addb(bits, word/8)
|
|
|
|
|
mask := uint8(1) << (word % 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < size; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
|
|
|
|
if mask == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits = addb(bits, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
if *bits == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Skip 8 words.
|
|
|
|
|
i += 7 * sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mask = 1
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if *bits&mask != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := (*uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(p + i))
|
|
|
|
|
writebarrierptr_nostore(x, *x)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mask <<= 1
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-07 20:47:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// typeBitsBulkBarrier executes writebarrierptr_nostore
|
|
|
|
|
// for every pointer slot in the memory range [p, p+size),
|
|
|
|
|
// using the type bitmap to locate those pointer slots.
|
|
|
|
|
// The type typ must correspond exactly to [p, p+size).
|
|
|
|
|
// This executes the write barriers necessary after a copy.
|
|
|
|
|
// Both p and size must be pointer-aligned.
|
|
|
|
|
// The type typ must have a plain bitmap, not a GC program.
|
|
|
|
|
// The only use of this function is in channel sends, and the
|
|
|
|
|
// 64 kB channel element limit takes care of this for us.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Must not be preempted because it typically runs right after memmove,
|
|
|
|
|
// and the GC must not complete between those two.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
//go:nosplit
|
|
|
|
|
func typeBitsBulkBarrier(typ *_type, p, size uintptr) {
|
|
|
|
|
if typ == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("runtime: typeBitsBulkBarrier without type")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.size != size {
|
2016-04-07 14:29:16 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("runtime: typeBitsBulkBarrier with type ", typ.string(), " of size ", typ.size, " but memory size", size)
|
2015-06-07 20:47:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("runtime: invalid typeBitsBulkBarrier")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0 {
|
2016-04-07 14:29:16 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("runtime: typeBitsBulkBarrier with type ", typ.string(), " with GC prog")
|
2015-06-07 20:47:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("runtime: invalid typeBitsBulkBarrier")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-13 18:45:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if !writeBarrier.needed {
|
2015-06-07 20:47:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
ptrmask := typ.gcdata
|
|
|
|
|
var bits uint32
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < typ.ptrdata; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
|
|
|
|
if i&(sys.PtrSize*8-1) == 0 {
|
2015-06-07 20:47:59 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bits = uint32(*ptrmask)
|
|
|
|
|
ptrmask = addb(ptrmask, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
bits = bits >> 1
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if bits&1 != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := (*uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(p + i))
|
|
|
|
|
writebarrierptr_nostore(x, *x)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// The methods operating on spans all require that h has been returned
|
|
|
|
|
// by heapBitsForSpan and that size, n, total are the span layout description
|
|
|
|
|
// returned by the mspan's layout method.
|
|
|
|
|
// If total > size*n, it means that there is extra leftover memory in the span,
|
|
|
|
|
// usually due to rounding.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(rsc): Perhaps introduce a different heapBitsSpan type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// initSpan initializes the heap bitmap for a span.
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It clears all checkmark bits.
|
2016-02-09 15:34:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// If this is a span of pointer-sized objects, it initializes all
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// words to pointer/scan.
|
2016-02-09 15:34:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, it initializes all words to scalar/dead.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) initSpan(s *mspan) {
|
|
|
|
|
size, n, total := s.layout()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Init the markbit structures
|
|
|
|
|
s.freeindex = 0
|
2016-02-24 12:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
s.allocCache = ^uint64(0) // all 1s indicating all free.
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
s.nelems = n
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
s.allocBits = nil
|
|
|
|
|
s.gcmarkBits = nil
|
|
|
|
|
s.gcmarkBits = newMarkBits(s.nelems)
|
|
|
|
|
s.allocBits = newAllocBits(s.nelems)
|
2016-02-09 07:38:44 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Clear bits corresponding to objects.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if total%heapBitmapScale != 0 {
|
2015-03-03 14:55:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
throw("initSpan: unaligned length")
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
nbyte := total / heapBitmapScale
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 8 && size == sys.PtrSize {
|
runtime: keep pointer bits set always in 1-word spans
It's dumb to clear them in initSpan, set them in heapBitsSetType,
clear them in heapBitsSweepSpan, set them again in heapBitsSetType,
clear them again in heapBitsSweepSpan, and so on.
Set them in initSpan and be done with it (until the span is reused
for objects of a different size).
This avoids an atomic operation in a common case (one-word allocation).
Suggested by rlh.
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.03) 5.93s × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.056)
Fannkuch11 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) 4.41s × (1.00,1.00) +1.42% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 86.1ns × (0.98,1.03) 88.9ns × (0.95,1.14) ~ (p=0.066)
FmtFprintfString 292ns × (0.97,1.04) 284ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 271ns × (0.98,1.06) 274ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.148)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.98,1.05) 487ns × (0.98,1.03) +1.85% (p=0.004)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.05) 394ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.184)
FmtFprintfFloat 553ns × (0.99,1.02) 543ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.71% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.90µs × (0.98,1.05) 1.88µs × (0.99,1.01) -0.97% (p=0.037)
GobDecode 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.3ms × (0.99,1.01) +0.78% (p=0.001)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.05) 11.6ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.39% (p=0.009)
Gzip 646ms × (1.00,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.120)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 142ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.068)
HTTPClientServer 89.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.1µs × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.224)
JSONEncode 31.3ms × (0.99,1.01) 31.2ms × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.149)
JSONDecode 113ms × (0.99,1.01) 111ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.25% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) +0.09% (p=0.015)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.55ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.10% (p=0.006)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) (sample has zero variance)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 563ns × (0.99,1.01) +4.51% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.99,1.01) 141ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.34% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.01) 888ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.20% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.02) 255ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.32% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.296)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.339)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.28% (p=0.022)
Revcomp 914ms × (0.99,1.01) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) -0.49% (p=0.031)
Template 128ms × (0.99,1.01) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.10% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 628ns × (0.99,1.01) 639ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.69% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 662ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.287)
Change-Id: I3127b0ab89708267c74aa7d0eae1db1a1bcdfda5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9884
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-10 11:43:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
end := h.bitp
|
|
|
|
|
bitp := subtractb(end, nbyte-1)
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*bitp = bitPointerAll | bitMarkedAll
|
runtime: keep pointer bits set always in 1-word spans
It's dumb to clear them in initSpan, set them in heapBitsSetType,
clear them in heapBitsSweepSpan, set them again in heapBitsSetType,
clear them again in heapBitsSweepSpan, and so on.
Set them in initSpan and be done with it (until the span is reused
for objects of a different size).
This avoids an atomic operation in a common case (one-word allocation).
Suggested by rlh.
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.03) 5.93s × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.056)
Fannkuch11 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) 4.41s × (1.00,1.00) +1.42% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 86.1ns × (0.98,1.03) 88.9ns × (0.95,1.14) ~ (p=0.066)
FmtFprintfString 292ns × (0.97,1.04) 284ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 271ns × (0.98,1.06) 274ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.148)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.98,1.05) 487ns × (0.98,1.03) +1.85% (p=0.004)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.05) 394ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.184)
FmtFprintfFloat 553ns × (0.99,1.02) 543ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.71% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.90µs × (0.98,1.05) 1.88µs × (0.99,1.01) -0.97% (p=0.037)
GobDecode 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.3ms × (0.99,1.01) +0.78% (p=0.001)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.05) 11.6ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.39% (p=0.009)
Gzip 646ms × (1.00,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.120)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 142ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.068)
HTTPClientServer 89.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.1µs × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.224)
JSONEncode 31.3ms × (0.99,1.01) 31.2ms × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.149)
JSONDecode 113ms × (0.99,1.01) 111ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.25% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) +0.09% (p=0.015)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.55ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.10% (p=0.006)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) (sample has zero variance)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 563ns × (0.99,1.01) +4.51% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.99,1.01) 141ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.34% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.01) 888ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.20% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.02) 255ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.32% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.296)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.339)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.28% (p=0.022)
Revcomp 914ms × (0.99,1.01) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) -0.49% (p=0.031)
Template 128ms × (0.99,1.01) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.10% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 628ns × (0.99,1.01) 639ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.69% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 662ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.287)
Change-Id: I3127b0ab89708267c74aa7d0eae1db1a1bcdfda5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9884
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-10 11:43:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if bitp == end {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
bitp = add1(bitp)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
memclr(unsafe.Pointer(subtractb(h.bitp, nbyte-1)), nbyte)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// initCheckmarkSpan initializes a span for being checkmarked.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It clears the checkmark bits, which are set to 1 in normal operation.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) initCheckmarkSpan(size, n, total uintptr) {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The ptrSize == 8 is a compile-time constant false on 32-bit and eliminates this code entirely.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 8 && size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Checkmark bit is type bit, bottom bit of every 2-bit entry.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Only possible on 64-bit system, since minimum size is 8.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Must clear type bit (checkmark bit) of every word.
|
|
|
|
|
// The type bit is the lower of every two-bit pair.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bitp := h.bitp
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += 4 {
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*bitp &^= bitPointerAll
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitp = subtract1(bitp)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i++ {
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp &^= bitMarked << (heapBitsShift + h.shift)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
h = h.forward(size / sys.PtrSize)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// clearCheckmarkSpan undoes all the checkmarking in a span.
|
|
|
|
|
// The actual checkmark bits are ignored, so the only work to do
|
|
|
|
|
// is to fix the pointer bits. (Pointer bits are ignored by scanobject
|
|
|
|
|
// but consulted by typedmemmove.)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func (h heapBits) clearCheckmarkSpan(size, n, total uintptr) {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The ptrSize == 8 is a compile-time constant false on 32-bit and eliminates this code entirely.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 8 && size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Checkmark bit is type bit, bottom bit of every 2-bit entry.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Only possible on 64-bit system, since minimum size is 8.
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Must clear type bit (checkmark bit) of every word.
|
|
|
|
|
// The type bit is the lower of every two-bit pair.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bitp := h.bitp
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += 4 {
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*bitp |= bitPointerAll
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitp = subtract1(bitp)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// oneBitCount is indexed by byte and produces the
|
|
|
|
|
// number of 1 bits in that byte. For example 128 has 1 bit set
|
|
|
|
|
// and oneBitCount[128] will holds 1.
|
|
|
|
|
var oneBitCount = [256]uint8{
|
|
|
|
|
0, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 3,
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 4,
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 4,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 4,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 4,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
4, 5, 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 4,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
4, 5, 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
|
|
|
|
|
2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
4, 5, 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
|
|
|
|
|
3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 6,
|
|
|
|
|
4, 5, 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
|
|
|
|
|
4, 5, 5, 6, 5, 6, 6, 7,
|
|
|
|
|
5, 6, 6, 7, 6, 7, 7, 8}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// countFree runs through the mark bits in a span and counts the number of free objects
|
|
|
|
|
// in the span.
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO:(rlh) Use popcount intrinsic.
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *mspan) countFree() int {
|
|
|
|
|
count := 0
|
|
|
|
|
maxIndex := s.nelems / 8
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < maxIndex; i++ {
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
mrkBits := *addb(s.gcmarkBits, i)
|
|
|
|
|
count += int(oneBitCount[mrkBits])
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if bitsInLastByte := s.nelems % 8; bitsInLastByte != 0 {
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
mrkBits := *addb(s.gcmarkBits, maxIndex)
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask := uint8((1 << bitsInLastByte) - 1)
|
2016-03-14 10:17:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bits := mrkBits & mask
|
2016-03-02 10:15:02 -07:00
|
|
|
|
count += int(oneBitCount[bits])
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return int(s.nelems) - count
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSetType records that the new allocation [x, x+size)
|
|
|
|
|
// holds in [x, x+dataSize) one or more values of type typ.
|
|
|
|
|
// (The number of values is given by dataSize / typ.size.)
|
|
|
|
|
// If dataSize < size, the fragment [x+dataSize, x+size) is
|
|
|
|
|
// recorded as non-pointer data.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// It is known that the type has pointers somewhere;
|
|
|
|
|
// malloc does not call heapBitsSetType when there are no pointers,
|
|
|
|
|
// because all free objects are marked as noscan during
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSweepSpan.
|
2016-05-12 16:10:03 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// There can only be one allocation from a given span active at a time,
|
2016-05-12 16:10:03 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// and the bitmap for a span always falls on byte boundaries,
|
|
|
|
|
// so there are no write-write races for access to the heap bitmap.
|
|
|
|
|
// Hence, heapBitsSetType can access the bitmap without atomics.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// There can be read-write races between heapBitsSetType and things
|
|
|
|
|
// that read the heap bitmap like scanobject. However, since
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSetType is only used for objects that have not yet been
|
|
|
|
|
// made reachable, readers will ignore bits being modified by this
|
|
|
|
|
// function. This does mean this function cannot transiently modify
|
|
|
|
|
// bits that belong to neighboring objects. Also, on weakly-ordered
|
|
|
|
|
// machines, callers must execute a store/store (publication) barrier
|
|
|
|
|
// between calling this function and making the object reachable.
|
2016-04-30 19:47:30 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: This still has atomic accesses left over from when it could
|
|
|
|
|
// race with GC accessing mark bits in the bitmap. Remove these.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsSetType(x, size, dataSize uintptr, typ *_type) {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
const doubleCheck = false // slow but helpful; enable to test modifications to this code
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// dataSize is always size rounded up to the next malloc size class,
|
|
|
|
|
// except in the case of allocating a defer block, in which case
|
|
|
|
|
// size is sizeof(_defer{}) (at least 6 words) and dataSize may be
|
|
|
|
|
// arbitrarily larger.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// The checks for size == sys.PtrSize and size == 2*sys.PtrSize can therefore
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// assume that dataSize == size without checking it explicitly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 8 && size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// It's one word and it has pointers, it must be a pointer.
|
runtime: keep pointer bits set always in 1-word spans
It's dumb to clear them in initSpan, set them in heapBitsSetType,
clear them in heapBitsSweepSpan, set them again in heapBitsSetType,
clear them again in heapBitsSweepSpan, and so on.
Set them in initSpan and be done with it (until the span is reused
for objects of a different size).
This avoids an atomic operation in a common case (one-word allocation).
Suggested by rlh.
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.03) 5.93s × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.056)
Fannkuch11 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) 4.41s × (1.00,1.00) +1.42% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 86.1ns × (0.98,1.03) 88.9ns × (0.95,1.14) ~ (p=0.066)
FmtFprintfString 292ns × (0.97,1.04) 284ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 271ns × (0.98,1.06) 274ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.148)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.98,1.05) 487ns × (0.98,1.03) +1.85% (p=0.004)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.05) 394ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.184)
FmtFprintfFloat 553ns × (0.99,1.02) 543ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.71% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.90µs × (0.98,1.05) 1.88µs × (0.99,1.01) -0.97% (p=0.037)
GobDecode 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.3ms × (0.99,1.01) +0.78% (p=0.001)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.05) 11.6ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.39% (p=0.009)
Gzip 646ms × (1.00,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.120)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 142ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.068)
HTTPClientServer 89.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.1µs × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.224)
JSONEncode 31.3ms × (0.99,1.01) 31.2ms × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.149)
JSONDecode 113ms × (0.99,1.01) 111ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.25% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) +0.09% (p=0.015)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.55ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.10% (p=0.006)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) (sample has zero variance)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 563ns × (0.99,1.01) +4.51% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.99,1.01) 141ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.34% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.01) 888ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.20% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.02) 255ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.32% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.296)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.339)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.28% (p=0.022)
Revcomp 914ms × (0.99,1.01) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) -0.49% (p=0.031)
Template 128ms × (0.99,1.01) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.10% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 628ns × (0.99,1.01) 639ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.69% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 662ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.287)
Change-Id: I3127b0ab89708267c74aa7d0eae1db1a1bcdfda5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9884
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-10 11:43:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// In general we'd need an atomic update here if the
|
|
|
|
|
// concurrent GC were marking objects in this span,
|
|
|
|
|
// because each bitmap byte describes 3 other objects
|
|
|
|
|
// in addition to the one being allocated.
|
|
|
|
|
// However, since all allocated one-word objects are pointers
|
|
|
|
|
// (non-pointers are aggregated into tinySize allocations),
|
|
|
|
|
// initSpan sets the pointer bits for us. Nothing to do here.
|
|
|
|
|
if doubleCheck {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
h := heapBitsForAddr(x)
|
runtime: keep pointer bits set always in 1-word spans
It's dumb to clear them in initSpan, set them in heapBitsSetType,
clear them in heapBitsSweepSpan, set them again in heapBitsSetType,
clear them again in heapBitsSweepSpan, and so on.
Set them in initSpan and be done with it (until the span is reused
for objects of a different size).
This avoids an atomic operation in a common case (one-word allocation).
Suggested by rlh.
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.03) 5.93s × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.056)
Fannkuch11 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) 4.41s × (1.00,1.00) +1.42% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 86.1ns × (0.98,1.03) 88.9ns × (0.95,1.14) ~ (p=0.066)
FmtFprintfString 292ns × (0.97,1.04) 284ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.64% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 271ns × (0.98,1.06) 274ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.148)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.98,1.05) 487ns × (0.98,1.03) +1.85% (p=0.004)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 397ns × (0.98,1.05) 394ns × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.184)
FmtFprintfFloat 553ns × (0.99,1.02) 543ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.71% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.90µs × (0.98,1.05) 1.88µs × (0.99,1.01) -0.97% (p=0.037)
GobDecode 15.1ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.3ms × (0.99,1.01) +0.78% (p=0.001)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.05) 11.6ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.39% (p=0.009)
Gzip 646ms × (1.00,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.120)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 142ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.068)
HTTPClientServer 89.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.1µs × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.224)
JSONEncode 31.3ms × (0.99,1.01) 31.2ms × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.149)
JSONDecode 113ms × (0.99,1.01) 111ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.25% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) +0.09% (p=0.015)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.55ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.10% (p=0.006)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 161ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) (sample has zero variance)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 563ns × (0.99,1.01) +4.51% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 140ns × (0.99,1.01) 141ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.34% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.01) 888ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.20% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.02) 255ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.32% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.296)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.01) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.339)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.01) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.28% (p=0.022)
Revcomp 914ms × (0.99,1.01) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) -0.49% (p=0.031)
Template 128ms × (0.99,1.01) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.10% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 628ns × (0.99,1.01) 639ns × (0.99,1.01) +1.69% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 662ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.287)
Change-Id: I3127b0ab89708267c74aa7d0eae1db1a1bcdfda5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9884
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-10 11:43:51 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if !h.isPointer() {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetType: pointer bit missing")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if !h.morePointers() {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetType: scan bit missing")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
h := heapBitsForAddr(x)
|
|
|
|
|
ptrmask := typ.gcdata // start of 1-bit pointer mask (or GC program, handled below)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Heap bitmap bits for 2-word object are only 4 bits,
|
|
|
|
|
// so also shared with objects next to it; use atomic updates.
|
|
|
|
|
// This is called out as a special case primarily for 32-bit systems,
|
|
|
|
|
// so that on 32-bit systems the code below can assume all objects
|
|
|
|
|
// are 4-word aligned (because they're all 16-byte aligned).
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if size == 2*sys.PtrSize {
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.size == sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// We're allocating a block big enough to hold two pointers.
|
|
|
|
|
// On 64-bit, that means the actual object must be two pointers,
|
|
|
|
|
// or else we'd have used the one-pointer-sized block.
|
|
|
|
|
// On 32-bit, however, this is the 8-byte block, the smallest one.
|
|
|
|
|
// So it could be that we're allocating one pointer and this was
|
|
|
|
|
// just the smallest block available. Distinguish by checking dataSize.
|
|
|
|
|
// (In general the number of instances of typ being allocated is
|
|
|
|
|
// dataSize/typ.size.)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 4 && dataSize == sys.PtrSize {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// 1 pointer object. On 32-bit machines clear the bit for the
|
|
|
|
|
// unused second word.
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if gcphase == _GCoff {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp &^= (bitPointer | bitMarked | ((bitPointer | bitMarked) << heapBitsShift)) << h.shift
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp |= (bitPointer | bitMarked) << h.shift
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.And8(h.bitp, ^uint8((bitPointer|bitMarked|((bitPointer|bitMarked)<<heapBitsShift))<<h.shift))
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(h.bitp, (bitPointer|bitMarked)<<h.shift)
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// 2-element slice of pointer.
|
|
|
|
|
if gcphase == _GCoff {
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp |= (bitPointer | bitMarked | bitPointer<<heapBitsShift) << h.shift
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(h.bitp, (bitPointer|bitMarked|bitPointer<<heapBitsShift)<<h.shift)
|
2015-05-15 12:23:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise typ.size must be 2*sys.PtrSize,
|
|
|
|
|
// and typ.kind&kindGCProg == 0.
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if doubleCheck {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if typ.size != 2*sys.PtrSize || typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0 {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("runtime: heapBitsSetType size=", size, " but typ.size=", typ.size, " gcprog=", typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetType")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b := uint32(*ptrmask)
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb := (b & 3) | bitMarked
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if gcphase == _GCoff {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// bitPointer == 1, bitMarked is 1 << 4, heapBitsShift is 1.
|
|
|
|
|
// 110011 is shifted h.shift and complemented.
|
|
|
|
|
// This clears out the bits that are about to be
|
|
|
|
|
// ored into *h.hbitp in the next instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp &^= (bitPointer | bitMarked | ((bitPointer | bitMarked) << heapBitsShift)) << h.shift
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp |= uint8(hb << h.shift)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// TODO:(rlh) since the GC is not concurrently setting the
|
|
|
|
|
// mark bits in the heap map anymore and malloc
|
|
|
|
|
// owns the span we are allocating in why does this have
|
|
|
|
|
// to be atomic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
atomic.And8(h.bitp, ^uint8((bitPointer|bitMarked|((bitPointer|bitMarked)<<heapBitsShift))<<h.shift))
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(h.bitp, uint8(hb<<h.shift))
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Copy from 1-bit ptrmask into 2-bit bitmap.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The basic approach is to use a single uintptr as a bit buffer,
|
|
|
|
|
// alternating between reloading the buffer and writing bitmap bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
// In general, one load can supply two bitmap byte writes.
|
|
|
|
|
// This is a lot of lines of code, but it compiles into relatively few
|
|
|
|
|
// machine instructions.
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
var (
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Ptrmask input.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p *byte // last ptrmask byte read
|
|
|
|
|
b uintptr // ptrmask bits already loaded
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
nb uintptr // number of bits in b at next read
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
endp *byte // final ptrmask byte to read (then repeat)
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
endnb uintptr // number of valid bits in *endp
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
pbits uintptr // alternate source of bits
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Heap bitmap output.
|
|
|
|
|
w uintptr // words processed
|
|
|
|
|
nw uintptr // number of words to process
|
|
|
|
|
hbitp *byte // next heap bitmap byte to write
|
|
|
|
|
hb uintptr // bits being prepared for *hbitp
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = h.bitp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Handle GC program. Delayed until this part of the code
|
|
|
|
|
// so that we can use the same double-checking mechanism
|
|
|
|
|
// as the 1-bit case. Nothing above could have encountered
|
|
|
|
|
// GC programs: the cases were all too small.
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
heapBitsSetTypeGCProg(h, typ.ptrdata, typ.size, dataSize, size, addb(typ.gcdata, 4))
|
|
|
|
|
if doubleCheck {
|
|
|
|
|
// Double-check the heap bits written by GC program
|
|
|
|
|
// by running the GC program to create a 1-bit pointer mask
|
|
|
|
|
// and then jumping to the double-check code below.
|
|
|
|
|
// This doesn't catch bugs shared between the 1-bit and 4-bit
|
|
|
|
|
// GC program execution, but it does catch mistakes specific
|
|
|
|
|
// to just one of those and bugs in heapBitsSetTypeGCProg's
|
|
|
|
|
// implementation of arrays.
|
|
|
|
|
lock(&debugPtrmask.lock)
|
|
|
|
|
if debugPtrmask.data == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
debugPtrmask.data = (*byte)(persistentalloc(1<<20, 1, &memstats.other_sys))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
ptrmask = debugPtrmask.data
|
|
|
|
|
runGCProg(addb(typ.gcdata, 4), nil, ptrmask, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
goto Phase4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Note about sizes:
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// typ.size is the number of words in the object,
|
|
|
|
|
// and typ.ptrdata is the number of words in the prefix
|
|
|
|
|
// of the object that contains pointers. That is, the final
|
|
|
|
|
// typ.size - typ.ptrdata words contain no pointers.
|
|
|
|
|
// This allows optimization of a common pattern where
|
|
|
|
|
// an object has a small header followed by a large scalar
|
|
|
|
|
// buffer. If we know the pointers are over, we don't have
|
|
|
|
|
// to scan the buffer's heap bitmap at all.
|
|
|
|
|
// The 1-bit ptrmasks are sized to contain only bits for
|
|
|
|
|
// the typ.ptrdata prefix, zero padded out to a full byte
|
|
|
|
|
// of bitmap. This code sets nw (below) so that heap bitmap
|
|
|
|
|
// bits are only written for the typ.ptrdata prefix; if there is
|
|
|
|
|
// more room in the allocated object, the next heap bitmap
|
|
|
|
|
// entry is a 00, indicating that there are no more pointers
|
|
|
|
|
// to scan. So only the ptrmask for the ptrdata bytes is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// Replicated copies are not as nice: if there is an array of
|
|
|
|
|
// objects with scalar tails, all but the last tail does have to
|
|
|
|
|
// be initialized, because there is no way to say "skip forward".
|
|
|
|
|
// However, because of the possibility of a repeated type with
|
|
|
|
|
// size not a multiple of 4 pointers (one heap bitmap byte),
|
|
|
|
|
// the code already must handle the last ptrmask byte specially
|
|
|
|
|
// by treating it as containing only the bits for endnb pointers,
|
|
|
|
|
// where endnb <= 4. We represent large scalar tails that must
|
|
|
|
|
// be expanded in the replication by setting endnb larger than 4.
|
|
|
|
|
// This will have the effect of reading many bits out of b,
|
|
|
|
|
// but once the real bits are shifted out, b will supply as many
|
|
|
|
|
// zero bits as we try to read, which is exactly what we need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p = ptrmask
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.size < dataSize {
|
|
|
|
|
// Filling in bits for an array of typ.
|
|
|
|
|
// Set up for repetition of ptrmask during main loop.
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Note that ptrmask describes only a prefix of
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
const maxBits = sys.PtrSize*8 - 7
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.ptrdata/sys.PtrSize <= maxBits {
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Entire ptrmask fits in uintptr with room for a byte fragment.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Load into pbits and never read from ptrmask again.
|
|
|
|
|
// This is especially important when the ptrmask has
|
|
|
|
|
// fewer than 8 bits in it; otherwise the reload in the middle
|
|
|
|
|
// of the Phase 2 loop would itself need to loop to gather
|
|
|
|
|
// at least 8 bits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Accumulate ptrmask into b.
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// ptrmask is sized to describe only typ.ptrdata, but we record
|
|
|
|
|
// it as describing typ.size bytes, since all the high bits are zero.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nb = typ.ptrdata / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < nb; i += 8 {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b |= uintptr(*p) << i
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nb = typ.size / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replicate ptrmask to fill entire pbits uintptr.
|
|
|
|
|
// Doubling and truncating is fewer steps than
|
|
|
|
|
// iterating by nb each time. (nb could be 1.)
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Since we loaded typ.ptrdata/sys.PtrSize bits
|
|
|
|
|
// but are pretending to have typ.size/sys.PtrSize,
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// there might be no replication necessary/possible.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
pbits = b
|
|
|
|
|
endnb = nb
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if nb+nb <= maxBits {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for endnb <= sys.PtrSize*8 {
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
pbits |= pbits << endnb
|
|
|
|
|
endnb += endnb
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Truncate to a multiple of original ptrmask.
|
|
|
|
|
endnb = maxBits / nb * nb
|
|
|
|
|
pbits &= 1<<endnb - 1
|
|
|
|
|
b = pbits
|
|
|
|
|
nb = endnb
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Clear p and endp as sentinel for using pbits.
|
|
|
|
|
// Checked during Phase 2 loop.
|
|
|
|
|
p = nil
|
|
|
|
|
endp = nil
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
// Ptrmask is larger. Read it multiple times.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
n := (typ.ptrdata/sys.PtrSize+7)/8 - 1
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
endp = addb(ptrmask, n)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
endnb = typ.size/sys.PtrSize - n*8
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if p != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
b = uintptr(*p)
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
nb = 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if typ.size == dataSize {
|
|
|
|
|
// Single entry: can stop once we reach the non-pointer data.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nw = typ.ptrdata / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
// Repeated instances of typ in an array.
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Have to process first N-1 entries in full, but can stop
|
|
|
|
|
// once we reach the non-pointer data in the final entry.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nw = ((dataSize/typ.size-1)*typ.size + typ.ptrdata) / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if nw == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// No pointers! Caller was supposed to check.
|
2016-04-07 14:29:16 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("runtime: invalid type ", typ.string())
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetType: called with non-pointer type")
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if nw < 2 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Must write at least 2 words, because the "no scan"
|
|
|
|
|
// encoding doesn't take effect until the third word.
|
|
|
|
|
nw = 2
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Phase 1: Special case for leading byte (shift==0) or half-byte (shift==4).
|
2016-04-30 19:47:30 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The leading byte is special because it contains the bits for word 1,
|
|
|
|
|
// which does not have the marked bits set.
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// The leading half-byte is special because it's a half a byte and must be
|
|
|
|
|
// manipulated atomically.
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
switch {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetType: unexpected shift")
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
case h.shift == 0:
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Ptrmask and heap bitmap are aligned.
|
|
|
|
|
// Handle first byte of bitmap specially.
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// The first byte we write out covers the first four
|
|
|
|
|
// words of the object. The scan/dead bit on the first
|
|
|
|
|
// word must be set to scan since there are pointers
|
|
|
|
|
// somewhere in the object. The scan/dead bit on the
|
|
|
|
|
// second word is the checkmark, so we don't set it.
|
|
|
|
|
// In all following words, we set the scan/dead
|
|
|
|
|
// appropriately to indicate that the object contains
|
|
|
|
|
// to the next 2-bit entry in the bitmap.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: It doesn't matter if we set the checkmark, so
|
|
|
|
|
// maybe this case isn't needed any more.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb = b & bitPointerAll
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb |= bitMarked | bitMarked<<(2*heapBitsShift) | bitMarked<<(3*heapBitsShift)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if w += 4; w >= nw {
|
|
|
|
|
goto Phase3
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = uint8(hb)
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
case sys.PtrSize == 8 && h.shift == 2:
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Ptrmask and heap bitmap are misaligned.
|
|
|
|
|
// The bits for the first two words are in a byte shared with another object
|
|
|
|
|
// and must be updated atomically.
|
|
|
|
|
// NOTE(rsc): The atomic here may not be necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
// We took care of 1-word and 2-word objects above,
|
|
|
|
|
// so this is at least a 6-word object, so our start bits
|
|
|
|
|
// are shared only with the type bits of another object,
|
|
|
|
|
// not with its mark bit. Since there is only one allocation
|
|
|
|
|
// from a given span at a time, we should be able to set
|
|
|
|
|
// these bits non-atomically. Not worth the risk right now.
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
hb = (b & (bitPointer | bitPointer<<heapBitsShift)) << (2 * heapBitsShift)
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// This is not noscan, so set the scan bit in the
|
|
|
|
|
// first word.
|
|
|
|
|
hb |= bitMarked << (2 * heapBitsShift)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b >>= 2
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 2
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Note: no bitMarker for second word because that's
|
|
|
|
|
// the checkmark.
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if gcphase == _GCoff {
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*hbitp &^= uint8((bitPointer | bitMarked | (bitPointer << heapBitsShift)) << (2 * heapBitsShift))
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*hbitp |= uint8(hb)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.And8(hbitp, ^(uint8(bitPointer|bitMarked|bitPointer<<heapBitsShift) << (2 * heapBitsShift)))
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(hbitp, uint8(hb))
|
runtime: skip atomics in heapBitsSetType when GC is not running
Suggested by Rick during code review of this code,
but separated out for easier diagnosis in case it causes
problems (and also easier rollback).
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 13.9ns × (0.98,1.05) 6.2ns × (0.99,1.01) -55.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 15.5ns × (0.95,1.10) 15.5ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.952)
SetTypePtr16 17.8ns × (0.99,1.05) 18.0ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
SetTypePtr32 25.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.3ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.86% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 42.2ns × (0.93,1.13) 40.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.239)
SetTypePtr126 67.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.5ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.365)
SetTypePtr128 67.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 70.1ns × (0.97,1.10) ~ (p=0.063)
SetTypePtrSlice 575ns × (0.98,1.06) 543ns × (0.95,1.17) -5.54% (p=0.034)
SetTypeNode1 12.4ns × (0.98,1.09) 12.8ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.40% (p=0.021)
SetTypeNode1Slice 97.1ns × (0.97,1.09) 89.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.78% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.8ns × (1.00,1.01) 17.7ns × (1.00,1.01) -40.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 204ns × (0.99,1.04) 190ns × (0.97,1.06) -6.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 42.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 44.0ns × (0.95,1.12) ~ (p=0.163)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.00µs × (0.95,1.09) 0.98µs × (0.96,1.08) ~ (p=0.356)
SetTypeNode64Dead 12.2ns × (0.99,1.04) 12.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.14µs × (0.94,1.11) 0.99µs × (0.99,1.03) -13.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 67.9ns × (0.99,1.03) 70.4ns × (0.95,1.15) ~ (p=0.115)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.76µs × (0.99,1.04) 1.88µs × (0.91,1.23) ~ (p=0.096)
SetTypeNode126 67.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.2ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.72% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.76µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.87µs × (0.93,1.15) +6.15% (p=0.035)
SetTypeNode1024 462ns × (0.96,1.10) 451ns × (0.99,1.05) ~ (p=0.224)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 14.4µs × (0.95,1.15) 14.2µs × (0.97,1.19) ~ (p=0.676)
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.98,1.04) 5.87s × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.993)
Fannkuch11 4.39s × (0.99,1.01) 4.34s × (1.00,1.01) -1.22% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.6ns × (0.97,1.06) 89.4ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.070)
FmtFprintfString 305ns × (0.98,1.02) 296ns × (0.99,1.02) -2.94% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 276ns × (0.97,1.04) 270ns × (0.98,1.03) -2.17% (p=0.001)
FmtFprintfIntInt 490ns × (0.97,1.05) 473ns × (0.99,1.02) -3.59% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 402ns × (0.99,1.02) 397ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.15% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 577ns × (0.99,1.01) 549ns × (0.99,1.01) -4.78% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.87µs × (0.99,1.01) -1.43% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 14.7ms × (0.99,1.02) -3.55% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 11.7ms × (0.98,1.04) 11.5ms × (0.99,1.02) -1.63% (p=0.002)
Gzip 647ms × (0.99,1.01) 647ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.486)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.234)
HTTPClientServer 90.7µs × (0.99,1.01) 90.4µs × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.331)
JSONEncode 31.9ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.206)
JSONDecode 110ms × (0.99,1.01) 112ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.48% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.00ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.058)
GoParse 6.63ms × (0.98,1.03) 6.61ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.353)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (0.99,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) -0.33% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 539ns × (0.99,1.01) 540ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.222)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 139ns × (0.99,1.01) 140ns × (0.97,1.03) ~ (p=0.054)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 886ns × (1.00,1.00) 887ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.18% (p=0.001)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 252ns × (1.00,1.01) 252ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.21% (p=0.010)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.7µs × (1.00,1.01) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.060)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.065)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) -0.27% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 916ms × (0.98,1.04) 909ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.054)
Template 126ms × (0.99,1.01) 128ms × (0.99,1.02) +1.43% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 632ns × (0.99,1.01) 625ns × (1.00,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 669ns × (0.99,1.02) +2.01% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I9477b7c9489c6fa98e860c190ce06cd73c53c6a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9829
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 13:50:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if w += 2; w >= nw {
|
|
|
|
|
// We know that there is more data, because we handled 2-word objects above.
|
|
|
|
|
// This must be at least a 6-word object. If we're out of pointer words,
|
|
|
|
|
// mark no scan in next bitmap byte and finish.
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb = 0
|
|
|
|
|
w += 4
|
|
|
|
|
goto Phase3
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Phase 2: Full bytes in bitmap, up to but not including write to last byte (full or partial) in bitmap.
|
|
|
|
|
// The loop computes the bits for that last write but does not execute the write;
|
|
|
|
|
// it leaves the bits in hb for processing by phase 3.
|
|
|
|
|
// To avoid repeated adjustment of nb, we subtract out the 4 bits we're going to
|
|
|
|
|
// use in the first half of the loop right now, and then we only adjust nb explicitly
|
|
|
|
|
// if the 8 bits used by each iteration isn't balanced by 8 bits loaded mid-loop.
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 4
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
// Emit bitmap byte.
|
|
|
|
|
// b has at least nb+4 bits, with one exception:
|
|
|
|
|
// if w+4 >= nw, then b has only nw-w bits,
|
|
|
|
|
// but we'll stop at the break and then truncate
|
|
|
|
|
// appropriately in Phase 3.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb = b & bitPointerAll
|
|
|
|
|
hb |= bitMarkedAll
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if w += 4; w >= nw {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = uint8(hb)
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Load more bits. b has nb right now.
|
|
|
|
|
if p != endp {
|
|
|
|
|
// Fast path: keep reading from ptrmask.
|
|
|
|
|
// nb unmodified: we just loaded 8 bits,
|
|
|
|
|
// and the next iteration will consume 8 bits,
|
|
|
|
|
// leaving us with the same nb the next time we're here.
|
2015-06-23 09:35:21 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if nb < 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
b |= uintptr(*p) << nb
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
// Reduce the number of bits in b.
|
|
|
|
|
// This is important if we skipped
|
|
|
|
|
// over a scalar tail, since nb could
|
|
|
|
|
// be larger than the bit width of b.
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else if p == nil {
|
|
|
|
|
// Almost as fast path: track bit count and refill from pbits.
|
|
|
|
|
// For short repetitions.
|
|
|
|
|
if nb < 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
b |= pbits << nb
|
|
|
|
|
nb += endnb
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 8 // for next iteration
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
// Slow path: reached end of ptrmask.
|
|
|
|
|
// Process final partial byte and rewind to start.
|
|
|
|
|
b |= uintptr(*p) << nb
|
|
|
|
|
nb += endnb
|
|
|
|
|
if nb < 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
b |= uintptr(*ptrmask) << nb
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p = add1(ptrmask)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
nb -= 8
|
|
|
|
|
p = ptrmask
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Emit bitmap byte.
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb = b & bitPointerAll
|
|
|
|
|
hb |= bitMarkedAll
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if w += 4; w >= nw {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = uint8(hb)
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase3:
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Phase 3: Write last byte or partial byte and zero the rest of the bitmap entries.
|
|
|
|
|
if w > nw {
|
|
|
|
|
// Counting the 4 entries in hb not yet written to memory,
|
|
|
|
|
// there are more entries than possible pointer slots.
|
|
|
|
|
// Discard the excess entries (can't be more than 3).
|
|
|
|
|
mask := uintptr(1)<<(4-(w-nw)) - 1
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb &= mask | mask<<4 // apply mask to both pointer bits and mark bits
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Change nw from counting possibly-pointer words to total words in allocation.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nw = size / sys.PtrSize
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Write whole bitmap bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
// The first is hb, the rest are zero.
|
|
|
|
|
if w <= nw {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = uint8(hb)
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hb = 0 // for possible final half-byte below
|
|
|
|
|
for w += 4; w <= nw; w += 4 {
|
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = 0
|
2015-05-10 18:22:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbitp = subtract1(hbitp)
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Write final partial bitmap byte if any.
|
|
|
|
|
// We know w > nw, or else we'd still be in the loop above.
|
|
|
|
|
// It can be bigger only due to the 4 entries in hb that it counts.
|
|
|
|
|
// If w == nw+4 then there's nothing left to do: we wrote all nw entries
|
|
|
|
|
// and can discard the 4 sitting in hb.
|
|
|
|
|
// But if w == nw+2, we need to write first two in hb.
|
|
|
|
|
// The byte is shared with the next object so we may need an atomic.
|
|
|
|
|
if w == nw+2 {
|
|
|
|
|
if gcphase == _GCoff {
|
|
|
|
|
*hbitp = *hbitp&^(bitPointer|bitMarked|(bitPointer|bitMarked)<<heapBitsShift) | uint8(hb)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2015-11-02 12:09:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
atomic.And8(hbitp, ^uint8(bitPointer|bitMarked|(bitPointer|bitMarked)<<heapBitsShift))
|
|
|
|
|
atomic.Or8(hbitp, uint8(hb))
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
Phase4:
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Phase 4: all done, but perhaps double check.
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if doubleCheck {
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
end := heapBitsForAddr(x + size)
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if typ.kind&kindGCProg == 0 && (hbitp != end.bitp || (w == nw+2) != (end.shift == 2)) {
|
2016-04-07 14:29:16 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("ended at wrong bitmap byte for", typ.string(), "x", dataSize/typ.size)
|
2015-05-07 20:39:57 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("typ.size=", typ.size, " typ.ptrdata=", typ.ptrdata, " dataSize=", dataSize, " size=", size, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
print("w=", w, " nw=", nw, " b=", hex(b), " nb=", nb, " hb=", hex(hb), "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
h0 := heapBitsForAddr(x)
|
|
|
|
|
print("initial bits h0.bitp=", h0.bitp, " h0.shift=", h0.shift, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
print("ended at hbitp=", hbitp, " but next starts at bitp=", end.bitp, " shift=", end.shift, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
throw("bad heapBitsSetType")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Double-check that bits to be written were written correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
// Does not check that other bits were not written, unfortunately.
|
|
|
|
|
h := heapBitsForAddr(x)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nptr := typ.ptrdata / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
ndata := typ.size / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
count := dataSize / typ.size
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
totalptr := ((count-1)*typ.size + typ.ptrdata) / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < size/sys.PtrSize; i++ {
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
j := i % ndata
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
var have, want uint8
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
have = (*h.bitp >> h.shift) & (bitPointer | bitMarked)
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if i >= totalptr {
|
|
|
|
|
want = 0 // deadmarker
|
|
|
|
|
if typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0 && i < (totalptr+3)/4*4 {
|
|
|
|
|
want = bitMarked
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if j < nptr && (*addb(ptrmask, j/8)>>(j%8))&1 != 0 {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
want |= bitPointer
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if i != 1 {
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
want |= bitMarked
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
have &^= bitMarked
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if have != want {
|
2016-04-07 14:29:16 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("mismatch writing bits for", typ.string(), "x", dataSize/typ.size)
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("typ.size=", typ.size, " typ.ptrdata=", typ.ptrdata, " dataSize=", dataSize, " size=", size, "\n")
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("kindGCProg=", typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0, "\n")
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("w=", w, " nw=", nw, " b=", hex(b), " nb=", nb, " hb=", hex(hb), "\n")
|
runtime: reorder bits in heap bitmap bytes
The runtime deals with 1-bit pointer bitmaps and 2-bit heap bitmaps
that have entries for both pointers and mark bits.
Each byte in a 1-bit pointer bitmap looks like pppppppp (all pointer bits).
Each byte in a 2-bit heap bitmap looks like mpmpmpmp (mark, pointer, ...).
This means that when converting from 1-bit to 2-bit, as we do
during malloc, we have to pick up 4 bits in pppp form and use
shifts to create the mpmpmpmp form.
This CL changes the 2-bit heap bitmap form to mmmmpppp,
so that 4 bits picked up in 1-bit form can be used directly in
the low bits of the heap bitmap byte, without expansion.
This simplifies the code, and it also happens to be faster.
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.0ns × (0.98,1.09) 14.0ns × (0.98,1.08) ~ (p=0.966)
SetTypePtr8 16.5ns × (0.99,1.05) 15.3ns × (0.96,1.16) -6.86% (p=0.012)
SetTypePtr16 21.3ns × (0.98,1.05) 18.8ns × (0.94,1.14) -11.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 34.6ns × (0.93,1.22) 27.7ns × (0.91,1.26) -20.08% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 55.7ns × (0.97,1.11) 41.6ns × (0.98,1.04) -25.30% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 98.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.7ns × (0.99,1.05) -30.88% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 98.6ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.6ns × (0.99,1.03) -30.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 781ns × (0.99,1.01) 571ns × (0.99,1.04) -26.93% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (0.99,1.01) -7.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 113ns × (0.99,1.01) 94ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.35% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 32.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 29.8ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 266ns × (1.00,1.00) 204ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.40% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 58.0ns × (0.98,1.08) 42.8ns × (1.00,1.01) -26.24% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.55µs × (0.99,1.02) 0.96µs × (1.00,1.00) -37.84% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 13.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 12.1ns × (1.00,1.00) -7.33% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.52µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.08µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 97.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 67.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -31.49% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 2.87µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.75µs × (1.00,1.01) -39.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 98.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 68.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.79% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 2.91µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.77µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 732ns × (1.00,1.00) 511ns × (0.87,1.42) -30.14% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) 13.9µs × (0.99,1.02) -39.83% (p=0.000)
Change-Id: I12e3b850a4e6fa6c8146b8635ff728f3ef658819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9828
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
2015-05-07 09:03:17 -06:00
|
|
|
|
h0 := heapBitsForAddr(x)
|
|
|
|
|
print("initial bits h0.bitp=", h0.bitp, " h0.shift=", h0.shift, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
print("current bits h.bitp=", h.bitp, " h.shift=", h.shift, " *h.bitp=", hex(*h.bitp), "\n")
|
runtime: reintroduce ``dead'' space during GC scan
Reintroduce an optimization discarded during the initial conversion
from 4-bit heap bitmaps to 2-bit heap bitmaps: when we reach the
place in the bitmap where there are no more pointers, mark that position
for the GC so that it can avoid scanning past that place.
During heapBitsSetType we can also avoid initializing heap bitmap
beyond that location, which gives a bit of a win compared to Go 1.4.
This particular optimization (not initializing the heap bitmap) may not last:
we might change typedmemmove to use the heap bitmap, in which
case it would all need to be initialized. The early stop in the GC scan
will stay no matter what.
Compared to Go 1.4 (github.com/rsc/go, branch go14bench):
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 80.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) -28.83% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 80.5ns × (1.00,1.01) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -83.77% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -28.75% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 2.16µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -29.74% (p=0.000)
Compared to previous CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypeNode64 56.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 57.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 13.1ns × (0.99,1.02) -77.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.56µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.54µs × (1.00,1.01) -0.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.55µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.52µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.23% (p=0.000)
This is the last CL in the sequence converting from the 4-bit heap
to the 2-bit heap, with all the same optimizations reenabled.
Compared to before that process began (compared to CL 9701 patch set 1):
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.94,1.09) 5.91s × (0.96,1.06) ~ (p=0.578)
Fannkuch11 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) 4.32s × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.474)
FmtFprintfEmpty 89.1ns × (0.95,1.16) 89.0ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.942)
FmtFprintfString 283ns × (0.98,1.02) 298ns × (0.98,1.06) +5.33% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfInt 284ns × (0.98,1.04) 286ns × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.208)
FmtFprintfIntInt 486ns × (0.98,1.03) 498ns × (0.97,1.06) +2.48% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 400ns × (0.99,1.02) 408ns × (0.98,1.02) +2.23% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 566ns × (0.99,1.01) 587ns × (0.98,1.01) +3.69% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.91µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.81% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.5ms × (0.98,1.05) 15.8ms × (0.98,1.03) +1.94% (p=0.002)
GobEncode 11.9ms × (0.97,1.03) 12.0ms × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.263)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.992)
Gunzip 143ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.585)
HTTPClientServer 89.2µs × (0.99,1.02) 90.3µs × (0.98,1.01) +1.24% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.3ms × (0.97,1.06) 31.6ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.29% (p=0.000)
JSONDecode 106ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (1.00,1.01) +0.62% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.02ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.03ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.250)
GoParse 6.57ms × (0.97,1.06) 6.53ms × (0.99,1.03) ~ (p=0.243)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 162ns × (1.00,1.00) 161ns × (1.00,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 561ns × (0.99,1.02) 541ns × (0.99,1.01) -3.67% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 145ns × (0.95,1.04) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) -5.04% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 864ns × (0.99,1.04) 887ns × (0.99,1.01) +2.57% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 255ns × (0.99,1.04) 253ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.05% (p=0.012)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 73.9µs × (0.98,1.04) 72.8µs × (1.00,1.00) -1.51% (p=0.005)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.92µs × (0.98,1.04) 3.85µs × (1.00,1.01) -1.88% (p=0.002)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 120µs × (0.98,1.04) 117µs × (1.00,1.01) -2.02% (p=0.001)
Revcomp 936ms × (0.95,1.08) 922ms × (0.97,1.08) ~ (p=0.234)
Template 130ms × (0.98,1.04) 126ms × (0.99,1.01) -2.99% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 638ns × (0.98,1.05) 628ns × (0.99,1.01) -1.54% (p=0.004)
TimeFormat 674ns × (0.99,1.01) 668ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.80% (p=0.001)
The slowdown of the first few benchmarks seems to be due to the new
atomic operations for certain small size allocations. But the larger
benchmarks mostly improve, probably due to the decreased memory
pressure from having half as much heap bitmap.
CL 9706, which removes the (never used anymore) wbshadow mode,
gets back what is lost in the early microbenchmarks.
Change-Id: I37423a209e8ec2a2e92538b45cac5422a6acd32d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9705
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 20:53:54 -06:00
|
|
|
|
print("ptrmask=", ptrmask, " p=", p, " endp=", endp, " endnb=", endnb, " pbits=", hex(pbits), " b=", hex(b), " nb=", nb, "\n")
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
println("at word", i, "offset", i*sys.PtrSize, "have", have, "want", want)
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if typ.kind&kindGCProg != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
println("GC program:")
|
|
|
|
|
dumpGCProg(addb(typ.gcdata, 4))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: optimize heapBitsSetType
For the conversion of the heap bitmap from 4-bit to 2-bit fields,
I replaced heapBitsSetType with the dumbest thing that could possibly work:
two atomic operations (atomicand8+atomicor8) per 2-bit field.
This CL replaces that code with a proper implementation that
avoids the atomics whenever possible. Benchmarks vs base CL
(before the conversion to 2-bit heap bitmap) and vs Go 1.4 below.
Compared to Go 1.4, SetTypePtr (a 1-pointer allocation)
is 10ns slower because a race against the concurrent GC requires the
use of an atomicor8 that used to be an ordinary write. This slowdown
was present even in the base CL.
Compared to both Go 1.4 and base, SetTypeNode8 (a 10-word allocation)
is 10ns slower because it too needs a new atomic, because with the
denser representation, the byte on the end of the allocation is now shared
with the object next to it; this was not true with the 4-bit representation.
Excluding these two (fundamental) slowdowns due to the use of atomics,
the new code is noticeably faster than both Go 1.4 and the base CL.
The next CL will reintroduce the ``typeDead'' optimization.
Stats are from 5 runs on a MacBookPro10,2 (late 2012 Core i5).
Compared to base CL (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 14.1ns × (0.99,1.02) 14.7ns × (0.93,1.10) ~ (p=0.175)
SetTypePtr8 18.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.866)
SetTypePtr16 28.7ns × (1.00,1.00) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -21.88% (p=0.015)
SetTypePtr32 52.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -35.37% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 79.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -30.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 118ns × (1.00,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -15.97% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 130ns × (0.92,1.19) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -24.36% (p=0.008)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (0.96,1.08) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.152)
SetTypeNode1 14.1ns × (0.94,1.15) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -14.60% (p=0.020)
SetTypeNode1Slice 135ns × (0.96,1.07) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -34.53% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 20.9ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +55.37% (p=0.000) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 414ns × (0.99,1.02) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -41.09% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 80.0ns × (1.00,1.00) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -28.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.15µs × (1.00,1.01) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -27.43% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 119ns × (0.99,1.00) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.40µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -13.80% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 120ns × (1.00,1.01) 98ns × (1.00,1.00) -18.19% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 3.53µs × (0.98,1.08) 3.02µs × (1.00,1.00) -14.49% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode1024 726ns × (0.97,1.09) 740ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.451)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 24.9µs × (0.89,1.37) 23.1µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.476)
Compared to Go 1.4 (** = new atomic)
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 5.71ns × (0.89,1.19) 14.68ns × (0.93,1.10) +157.24% (p=0.000) **
SetTypePtr8 19.3ns × (0.96,1.10) 18.6ns × (0.81,1.21) ~ (p=0.638)
SetTypePtr16 30.7ns × (0.99,1.03) 22.4ns × (0.90,1.27) -26.88% (p=0.005)
SetTypePtr32 51.5ns × (1.00,1.00) 33.8ns × (0.93,1.24) -34.40% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 83.6ns × (0.94,1.12) 55.1ns × (1.00,1.01) -34.12% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr126 137ns × (0.87,1.26) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -27.10% (p=0.028)
SetTypePtrSlice 865ns × (0.80,1.23) 760ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.243)
SetTypeNode1 15.2ns × (0.88,1.12) 12.0ns × (1.00,1.01) -20.89% (p=0.014)
SetTypeNode1Slice 156ns × (0.93,1.16) 88ns × (1.00,1.00) -43.57% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode8 23.8ns × (0.90,1.18) 32.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +36.76% (p=0.003) **
SetTypeNode8Slice 502ns × (0.92,1.10) 244ns × (1.00,1.00) -51.46% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 85.6ns × (0.94,1.11) 57.4ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.89% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode64Slice 2.36µs × (0.91,1.14) 1.56µs × (1.00,1.00) -33.96% (p=0.002)
SetTypeNode124 130ns × (0.91,1.12) 100ns × (1.00,1.00) -23.49% (p=0.004)
SetTypeNode124Slice 3.81µs × (0.90,1.22) 2.93µs × (1.00,1.00) -23.09% (p=0.025)
There are fewer benchmarks vs Go 1.4 because unrolling directly
into the heap bitmap is not yet implemented, so those would not
be meaningful comparisons.
These benchmarks were not present in Go 1.4 as distributed.
The backport to Go 1.4 is in github.com/rsc/go's go14bench branch,
commit 71d5ee5.
Change-Id: I95ed05a22bf484b0fc9efad549279e766c98d2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9704
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
2015-05-04 09:30:10 -06:00
|
|
|
|
throw("bad heapBitsSetType")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
h = h.next()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if ptrmask == debugPtrmask.data {
|
|
|
|
|
unlock(&debugPtrmask.lock)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSetTypeNoScan marks x as noscan by setting the first word
|
|
|
|
|
// of x in the heap bitmap to scalar/dead.
|
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsSetTypeNoScan(x uintptr) {
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
h := heapBitsForAddr(uintptr(x))
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
*h.bitp &^= (bitPointer | bitMarked) << h.shift
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
var debugPtrmask struct {
|
|
|
|
|
lock mutex
|
|
|
|
|
data *byte
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSetTypeGCProg implements heapBitsSetType using a GC program.
|
|
|
|
|
// progSize is the size of the memory described by the program.
|
|
|
|
|
// elemSize is the size of the element that the GC program describes (a prefix of).
|
|
|
|
|
// dataSize is the total size of the intended data, a multiple of elemSize.
|
|
|
|
|
// allocSize is the total size of the allocated memory.
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
//
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// GC programs are only used for large allocations.
|
|
|
|
|
// heapBitsSetType requires that allocSize is a multiple of 4 words,
|
|
|
|
|
// so that the relevant bitmap bytes are not shared with surrounding
|
|
|
|
|
// objects and need not be accessed with atomic instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
func heapBitsSetTypeGCProg(h heapBits, progSize, elemSize, dataSize, allocSize uintptr, prog *byte) {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if sys.PtrSize == 8 && allocSize%(4*sys.PtrSize) != 0 {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Alignment will be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetTypeGCProg: small allocation")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
var totalBits uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
if elemSize == dataSize {
|
|
|
|
|
totalBits = runGCProg(prog, nil, h.bitp, 2)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if totalBits*sys.PtrSize != progSize {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
println("runtime: heapBitsSetTypeGCProg: total bits", totalBits, "but progSize", progSize)
|
|
|
|
|
throw("heapBitsSetTypeGCProg: unexpected bit count")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
count := dataSize / elemSize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Piece together program trailer to run after prog that does:
|
|
|
|
|
// literal(0)
|
|
|
|
|
// repeat(1, elemSize-progSize-1) // zeros to fill element size
|
|
|
|
|
// repeat(elemSize, count-1) // repeat that element for count
|
|
|
|
|
// This zero-pads the data remaining in the first element and then
|
|
|
|
|
// repeats that first element to fill the array.
|
|
|
|
|
var trailer [40]byte // 3 varints (max 10 each) + some bytes
|
|
|
|
|
i := 0
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
if n := elemSize/sys.PtrSize - progSize/sys.PtrSize; n > 0 {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// literal(0)
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = 0x01
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = 0
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
if n > 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
// repeat(1, n-1)
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = 0x81
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
n--
|
|
|
|
|
for ; n >= 0x80; n >>= 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n | 0x80)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// repeat(elemSize/ptrSize, count-1)
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = 0x80
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
n := elemSize / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for ; n >= 0x80; n >>= 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n | 0x80)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
2015-06-26 15:24:12 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n = count - 1
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for ; n >= 0x80; n >>= 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n | 0x80)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = byte(n)
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
trailer[i] = 0
|
|
|
|
|
i++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runGCProg(prog, &trailer[0], h.bitp, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Even though we filled in the full array just now,
|
|
|
|
|
// record that we only filled in up to the ptrdata of the
|
|
|
|
|
// last element. This will cause the code below to
|
|
|
|
|
// memclr the dead section of the final array element,
|
|
|
|
|
// so that scanobject can stop early in the final element.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
totalBits = (elemSize*(count-1) + progSize) / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
endProg := unsafe.Pointer(subtractb(h.bitp, (totalBits+3)/4))
|
|
|
|
|
endAlloc := unsafe.Pointer(subtractb(h.bitp, allocSize/heapBitmapScale))
|
|
|
|
|
memclr(add(endAlloc, 1), uintptr(endProg)-uintptr(endAlloc))
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// progToPointerMask returns the 1-bit pointer mask output by the GC program prog.
|
|
|
|
|
// size the size of the region described by prog, in bytes.
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// The resulting bitvector will have no more than size/sys.PtrSize bits.
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func progToPointerMask(prog *byte, size uintptr) bitvector {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
n := (size/sys.PtrSize + 7) / 8
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
x := (*[1 << 30]byte)(persistentalloc(n+1, 1, &memstats.buckhash_sys))[:n+1]
|
|
|
|
|
x[len(x)-1] = 0xa1 // overflow check sentinel
|
|
|
|
|
n = runGCProg(prog, nil, &x[0], 1)
|
|
|
|
|
if x[len(x)-1] != 0xa1 {
|
|
|
|
|
throw("progToPointerMask: overflow")
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return bitvector{int32(n), &x[0]}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Packed GC pointer bitmaps, aka GC programs.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// For large types containing arrays, the type information has a
|
|
|
|
|
// natural repetition that can be encoded to save space in the
|
|
|
|
|
// binary and in the memory representation of the type information.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// The encoding is a simple Lempel-Ziv style bytecode machine
|
|
|
|
|
// with the following instructions:
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// 00000000: stop
|
|
|
|
|
// 0nnnnnnn: emit n bits copied from the next (n+7)/8 bytes
|
|
|
|
|
// 10000000 n c: repeat the previous n bits c times; n, c are varints
|
|
|
|
|
// 1nnnnnnn c: repeat the previous n bits c times; c is a varint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// runGCProg executes the GC program prog, and then trailer if non-nil,
|
|
|
|
|
// writing to dst with entries of the given size.
|
|
|
|
|
// If size == 1, dst is a 1-bit pointer mask laid out moving forward from dst.
|
|
|
|
|
// If size == 2, dst is the 2-bit heap bitmap, and writes move backward
|
|
|
|
|
// starting at dst (because the heap bitmap does). In this case, the caller guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
// that only whole bytes in dst need to be written.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// runGCProg returns the number of 1- or 2-bit entries written to memory.
|
|
|
|
|
func runGCProg(prog, trailer, dst *byte, size int) uintptr {
|
|
|
|
|
dstStart := dst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bits waiting to be written to memory.
|
|
|
|
|
var bits uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
var nbits uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p := prog
|
|
|
|
|
Run:
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Flush accumulated full bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
// The rest of the loop assumes that nbits <= 7.
|
|
|
|
|
for ; nbits >= 8; nbits -= 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = add1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 8
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
v := bits&bitPointerAll | bitMarkedAll
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(v)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
v = bits&bitPointerAll | bitMarkedAll
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(v)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Process one instruction.
|
|
|
|
|
inst := uintptr(*p)
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
n := inst & 0x7F
|
|
|
|
|
if inst&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Literal bits; n == 0 means end of program.
|
|
|
|
|
if n == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Program is over; continue in trailer if present.
|
|
|
|
|
if trailer != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
//println("trailer")
|
|
|
|
|
p = trailer
|
|
|
|
|
trailer = nil
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
//println("done")
|
|
|
|
|
break Run
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
//println("lit", n, dst)
|
|
|
|
|
nbyte := n / 8
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < nbyte; i++ {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= uintptr(*p) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = add1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 8
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
v := bits&0xf | bitMarkedAll
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(v)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
v = bits&0xf | bitMarkedAll
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(v)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if n %= 8; n > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= uintptr(*p) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += n
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
continue Run
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Repeat. If n == 0, it is encoded in a varint in the next bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
if n == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
for off := uint(0); ; off += 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := uintptr(*p)
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
n |= (x & 0x7F) << off
|
|
|
|
|
if x&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Count is encoded in a varint in the next bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
c := uintptr(0)
|
|
|
|
|
for off := uint(0); ; off += 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := uintptr(*p)
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
c |= (x & 0x7F) << off
|
|
|
|
|
if x&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
c *= n // now total number of bits to copy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the number of bits being repeated is small, load them
|
|
|
|
|
// into a register and use that register for the entire loop
|
|
|
|
|
// instead of repeatedly reading from memory.
|
|
|
|
|
// Handling fewer than 8 bits here makes the general loop simpler.
|
2016-02-11 11:57:58 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// The cutoff is sys.PtrSize*8 - 7 to guarantee that when we add
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// the pattern to a bit buffer holding at most 7 bits (a partial byte)
|
|
|
|
|
// it will not overflow.
|
|
|
|
|
src := dst
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
const maxBits = sys.PtrSize*8 - 7
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if n <= maxBits {
|
|
|
|
|
// Start with bits in output buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
pattern := bits
|
|
|
|
|
npattern := nbits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we need more bits, fetch them from memory.
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
src = subtract1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
for npattern < n {
|
|
|
|
|
pattern <<= 8
|
|
|
|
|
pattern |= uintptr(*src)
|
|
|
|
|
src = subtract1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
npattern += 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
src = add1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
for npattern < n {
|
|
|
|
|
pattern <<= 4
|
|
|
|
|
pattern |= uintptr(*src) & 0xf
|
|
|
|
|
src = add1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
npattern += 4
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// We started with the whole bit output buffer,
|
|
|
|
|
// and then we loaded bits from whole bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
// Either way, we might now have too many instead of too few.
|
|
|
|
|
// Discard the extra.
|
|
|
|
|
if npattern > n {
|
|
|
|
|
pattern >>= npattern - n
|
|
|
|
|
npattern = n
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replicate pattern to at most maxBits.
|
|
|
|
|
if npattern == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
// One bit being repeated.
|
|
|
|
|
// If the bit is 1, make the pattern all 1s.
|
|
|
|
|
// If the bit is 0, the pattern is already all 0s,
|
|
|
|
|
// but we can claim that the number of bits
|
|
|
|
|
// in the word is equal to the number we need (c),
|
|
|
|
|
// because right shift of bits will zero fill.
|
|
|
|
|
if pattern == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
pattern = 1<<maxBits - 1
|
|
|
|
|
npattern = maxBits
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
npattern = c
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
b := pattern
|
|
|
|
|
nb := npattern
|
|
|
|
|
if nb+nb <= maxBits {
|
|
|
|
|
// Double pattern until the whole uintptr is filled.
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
for nb <= sys.PtrSize*8 {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
b |= b << nb
|
|
|
|
|
nb += nb
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Trim away incomplete copy of original pattern in high bits.
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(rsc): Replace with table lookup or loop on systems without divide?
|
|
|
|
|
nb = maxBits / npattern * npattern
|
|
|
|
|
b &= 1<<nb - 1
|
|
|
|
|
pattern = b
|
|
|
|
|
npattern = nb
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add pattern to bit buffer and flush bit buffer, c/npattern times.
|
|
|
|
|
// Since pattern contains >8 bits, there will be full bytes to flush
|
|
|
|
|
// on each iteration.
|
|
|
|
|
for ; c >= npattern; c -= npattern {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= pattern << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += npattern
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
for nbits >= 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = add1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 8
|
|
|
|
|
nbits -= 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
for nbits >= 4 {
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits&0xf | bitMarkedAll)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
nbits -= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Add final fragment to bit buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
if c > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
pattern &= 1<<c - 1
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= pattern << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += c
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
continue Run
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Repeat; n too large to fit in a register.
|
|
|
|
|
// Since nbits <= 7, we know the first few bytes of repeated data
|
|
|
|
|
// are already written to memory.
|
|
|
|
|
off := n - nbits // n > nbits because n > maxBits and nbits <= 7
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
// Leading src fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
src = subtractb(src, (off+7)/8)
|
|
|
|
|
if frag := off & 7; frag != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= uintptr(*src) >> (8 - frag) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
src = add1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += frag
|
|
|
|
|
c -= frag
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Main loop: load one byte, write another.
|
|
|
|
|
// The bits are rotating through the bit buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
for i := c / 8; i > 0; i-- {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= uintptr(*src) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
src = add1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = add1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Final src fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
if c %= 8; c > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= (uintptr(*src) & (1<<c - 1)) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += c
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
// Leading src fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
src = addb(src, (off+3)/4)
|
|
|
|
|
if frag := off & 3; frag != 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= (uintptr(*src) & 0xf) >> (4 - frag) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
src = subtract1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += frag
|
|
|
|
|
c -= frag
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Main loop: load one byte, write another.
|
|
|
|
|
// The bits are rotating through the bit buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
for i := c / 4; i > 0; i-- {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= (uintptr(*src) & 0xf) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
src = subtract1(src)
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits&0xf | bitMarkedAll)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// Final src fragment.
|
|
|
|
|
if c %= 4; c > 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
bits |= (uintptr(*src) & (1<<c - 1)) << nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += c
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// Write any final bits out, using full-byte writes, even for the final byte.
|
|
|
|
|
var totalBits uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
if size == 1 {
|
|
|
|
|
totalBits = (uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(dst))-uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(dstStart)))*8 + nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += -nbits & 7
|
|
|
|
|
for ; nbits > 0; nbits -= 8 {
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(bits)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = add1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 8
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
totalBits = (uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(dstStart))-uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(dst)))*4 + nbits
|
|
|
|
|
nbits += -nbits & 3
|
|
|
|
|
for ; nbits > 0; nbits -= 4 {
|
|
|
|
|
v := bits&0xf | bitMarkedAll
|
|
|
|
|
*dst = uint8(v)
|
|
|
|
|
dst = subtract1(dst)
|
|
|
|
|
bits >>= 4
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return totalBits
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func dumpGCProg(p *byte) {
|
|
|
|
|
nptr := 0
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
|
x := *p
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
if x == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
print("\t", nptr, " end\n")
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if x&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
print("\t", nptr, " lit ", x, ":")
|
|
|
|
|
n := int(x+7) / 8
|
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
|
|
|
|
|
print(" ", hex(*p))
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
print("\n")
|
|
|
|
|
nptr += int(x)
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
nbit := int(x &^ 0x80)
|
|
|
|
|
if nbit == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
for nb := uint(0); ; nb += 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := *p
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
nbit |= int(x&0x7f) << nb
|
|
|
|
|
if x&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
count := 0
|
|
|
|
|
for nb := uint(0); ; nb += 7 {
|
|
|
|
|
x := *p
|
|
|
|
|
p = add1(p)
|
|
|
|
|
count |= int(x&0x7f) << nb
|
|
|
|
|
if x&0x80 == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
print("\t", nptr, " repeat ", nbit, " × ", count, "\n")
|
|
|
|
|
nptr += nbit * count
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func getgcmaskcb(frame *stkframe, ctxt unsafe.Pointer) bool {
|
|
|
|
|
target := (*stkframe)(ctxt)
|
|
|
|
|
if frame.sp <= target.sp && target.sp < frame.varp {
|
|
|
|
|
*target = *frame
|
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// gcbits returns the GC type info for x, for testing.
|
|
|
|
|
// The result is the bitmap entries (0 or 1), one entry per byte.
|
|
|
|
|
//go:linkname reflect_gcbits reflect.gcbits
|
|
|
|
|
func reflect_gcbits(x interface{}) []byte {
|
|
|
|
|
ret := getgcmask(x)
|
2015-10-21 13:12:25 -06:00
|
|
|
|
typ := (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(efaceOf(&x)._type)).elem
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
nptr := typ.ptrdata / sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for uintptr(len(ret)) > nptr && ret[len(ret)-1] == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
ret = ret[:len(ret)-1]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return ret
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
// Returns GC type info for object p for testing.
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
func getgcmask(ep interface{}) (mask []byte) {
|
2015-10-21 13:12:25 -06:00
|
|
|
|
e := *efaceOf(&ep)
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
p := e.data
|
|
|
|
|
t := e._type
|
|
|
|
|
// data or bss
|
2015-04-06 18:55:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
for datap := &firstmoduledata; datap != nil; datap = datap.next {
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// data
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if datap.data <= uintptr(p) && uintptr(p) < datap.edata {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap := datap.gcdatamask.bytedata
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n := (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(t)).elem.size
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask = make([]byte, n/sys.PtrSize)
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
|
|
|
|
off := (uintptr(p) + i - datap.data) / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
mask[i/sys.PtrSize] = (*addb(bitmap, off/8) >> (off % 8)) & 1
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
// bss
|
|
|
|
|
if datap.bss <= uintptr(p) && uintptr(p) < datap.ebss {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap := datap.gcbssmask.bytedata
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n := (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(t)).elem.size
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask = make([]byte, n/sys.PtrSize)
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
|
|
|
|
off := (uintptr(p) + i - datap.bss) / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
mask[i/sys.PtrSize] = (*addb(bitmap, off/8) >> (off % 8)) & 1
|
2015-03-29 15:59:00 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// heap
|
|
|
|
|
var n uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
var base uintptr
|
|
|
|
|
if mlookup(uintptr(p), &base, &n, nil) != 0 {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask = make([]byte, n/sys.PtrSize)
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
hbits := heapBitsForAddr(base + i)
|
|
|
|
|
if hbits.isPointer() {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask[i/sys.PtrSize] = 1
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: reclaim scan/dead bit in first word
With the switch to separate mark bitmaps, the scan/dead bit for the
first word of each object is now unused. Reclaim this bit and use it
as a scan/dead bit, just like words three and on. The second word is
still used for checkmark.
This dramatically simplifies heapBitsSetTypeNoScan and hasPointers,
since they no longer need different cases for 1, 2, and 3+ word
objects. They can instead just manipulate the heap bitmap for the
first word and be done with it.
In order to enable this, we change heapBitsSetType and runGCProg to
always set the scan/dead bit to scan for the first word on every code
path. Since these functions only apply to types that have pointers,
there's no need to do this conditionally: it's *always* necessary to
set the scan bit in the first word.
We also change every place that scans an object and checks if there
are more pointers. Rather than only checking morePointers if the word
is >= 2, we now check morePointers if word != 1 (since that's the
checkmark word).
Looking forward, we should probably reclaim the checkmark bit, too,
but that's going to be quite a bit more work.
Tested by setting doubleCheck in heapBitsSetType and running all.bash
on both linux/amd64 and linux/386, and by running GOGC=10 all.bash.
This particularly improves the FmtFprintf* go1 benchmarks, since they
do a large amount of noscan allocation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.34s ± 1% 2.38s ± 1% +1.70% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Fannkuch11-12 2.09s ± 0% 2.09s ± 1% ~ (p=0.276 n=17+16)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 44.9ns ± 2% 44.8ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.340 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfString-12 127ns ± 0% 125ns ± 0% -1.57% (p=0.000 n=16+15)
FmtFprintfInt-12 128ns ± 0% 122ns ± 1% -4.45% (p=0.000 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 207ns ± 1% 193ns ± 0% -6.55% (p=0.000 n=19+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 197ns ± 1% 191ns ± 0% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 263ns ± 0% 248ns ± 1% -5.88% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 794ns ± 0% 779ns ± 1% -1.90% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobDecode-12 7.14ms ± 2% 7.11ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.072 n=20+20)
GobEncode-12 5.85ms ± 1% 5.82ms ± 1% -0.49% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 218ms ± 1% 215ms ± 1% -1.22% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Gunzip-12 36.8ms ± 0% 36.7ms ± 0% -0.18% (p=0.006 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 77.1µs ± 4% 77.1µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.945 n=19+20)
JSONEncode-12 15.6ms ± 1% 15.9ms ± 1% +1.68% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
JSONDecode-12 55.2ms ± 1% 53.6ms ± 1% -2.93% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
Mandelbrot200-12 4.05ms ± 1% 4.05ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.306 n=17+17)
GoParse-12 3.14ms ± 1% 3.10ms ± 1% -1.31% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 69.3ns ± 1% 70.0ns ± 0% +0.89% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 237ns ± 1% 236ns ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 69.5ns ± 1% 70.3ns ± 1% +1.14% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 377ns ± 1% 366ns ± 1% -3.03% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 107ns ± 1% 107ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.318 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 33.8µs ± 3% 33.5µs ± 1% -1.04% (p=0.001 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 1.68µs ± 1% 1.73µs ± 0% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 50.8µs ± 1% 52.0µs ± 1% +2.50% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12 381ms ± 1% 385ms ± 1% +1.00% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
Template-12 64.9ms ± 3% 62.6ms ± 1% -3.55% (p=0.000 n=19+18)
TimeParse-12 324ns ± 0% 328ns ± 1% +1.25% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
TimeFormat-12 345ns ± 0% 334ns ± 0% -3.31% (p=0.000 n=15+17)
[Geo mean] 52.1µs 51.5µs -1.00%
Change-Id: I13e74da3193a7f80794c654f944d1f0d60817049
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22632
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2016-04-29 12:51:48 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if i != 1*sys.PtrSize && !hbits.morePointers() {
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask = mask[:i/sys.PtrSize]
|
2015-05-04 08:19:24 -06:00
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// stack
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if _g_ := getg(); _g_.m.curg.stack.lo <= uintptr(p) && uintptr(p) < _g_.m.curg.stack.hi {
|
|
|
|
|
var frame stkframe
|
|
|
|
|
frame.sp = uintptr(p)
|
|
|
|
|
_g_ := getg()
|
|
|
|
|
gentraceback(_g_.m.curg.sched.pc, _g_.m.curg.sched.sp, 0, _g_.m.curg, 0, nil, 1000, getgcmaskcb, noescape(unsafe.Pointer(&frame)), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
if frame.fn != nil {
|
|
|
|
|
f := frame.fn
|
|
|
|
|
targetpc := frame.continpc
|
|
|
|
|
if targetpc == 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if targetpc != f.entry {
|
|
|
|
|
targetpc--
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: add pcvalue cache to improve stack scan speed
The cost of scanning large stacks is currently dominated by the time
spent looking up and decoding the pcvalue table. However, large stacks
are usually large not because they contain calls to many different
functions, but because they contain many calls to the same, small set
of recursive functions. Hence, walking large stacks tends to make the
same pcvalue queries many times.
Based on this observation, this commit adds a small, very simple, and
fast cache in front of pcvalue lookup. We thread this cache down from
operations that make many pcvalue calls, such as gentraceback, stack
scanning, and stack adjusting.
This simple cache works well because it has minimal overhead when it's
not effective. I also tried a hashed direct-map cache, CLOCK-based
replacement, round-robin replacement, and round-robin with lookups
disabled until there had been at least 16 probes, but none of these
approaches had obvious wins over the random replacement policy in this
commit.
This nearly doubles the overall performance of the deep stack test
program from issue #10898:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Issue10898 16.5s ±12% 9.2s ±12% -44.37% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
It's a very slight win on the garbage benchmark:
name old time/op new time/op delta
XBenchGarbage-12 4.92ms ± 1% 4.89ms ± 1% -0.75% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
It's a wash (but doesn't harm performance) on the go1 benchmarks,
which don't have particularly deep stacks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 3.11s ± 2% 3.20s ± 3% +2.83% (p=0.000 n=17+20)
Fannkuch11-12 2.51s ± 1% 2.51s ± 1% -0.22% (p=0.034 n=19+18)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 50.8ns ± 3% 50.6ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.793 n=20+20)
FmtFprintfString-12 174ns ± 0% 174ns ± 1% +0.17% (p=0.048 n=15+20)
FmtFprintfInt-12 177ns ± 0% 165ns ± 1% -6.99% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 283ns ± 1% 284ns ± 0% +0.22% (p=0.000 n=18+15)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 243ns ± 1% 244ns ± 1% +0.40% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 318ns ± 0% 319ns ± 0% +0.27% (p=0.001 n=19+20)
FmtManyArgs-12 1.12µs ± 0% 1.14µs ± 0% +1.74% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
GobDecode-12 8.69ms ± 0% 8.73ms ± 1% +0.46% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
GobEncode-12 6.64ms ± 1% 6.61ms ± 1% -0.46% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 323ms ± 2% 319ms ± 1% -1.11% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gunzip-12 42.8ms ± 0% 42.9ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.158 n=18+20)
HTTPClientServer-12 63.3µs ± 1% 63.1µs ± 1% -0.35% (p=0.011 n=20+20)
JSONEncode-12 16.9ms ± 1% 17.3ms ± 1% +2.84% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
JSONDecode-12 59.7ms ± 0% 58.5ms ± 0% -2.05% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
Mandelbrot200-12 3.92ms ± 0% 3.91ms ± 0% -0.16% (p=0.003 n=19+19)
GoParse-12 3.79ms ± 2% 3.75ms ± 2% -0.91% (p=0.005 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 102ns ± 1% 101ns ± 1% -0.80% (p=0.001 n=14+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 337ns ± 1% 346ns ± 1% +2.90% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 84.4ns ± 2% 84.3ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.743 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 502ns ± 1% 505ns ± 0% +0.64% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 133ns ± 1% 132ns ± 1% -0.85% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 40.1µs ± 1% 39.8µs ± 1% -0.77% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 2.08µs ± 1% 2.07µs ± 1% -0.55% (p=0.001 n=18+19)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 62.4µs ± 1% 62.0µs ± 1% -0.74% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Revcomp-12 545ms ± 2% 545ms ± 3% ~ (p=0.771 n=19+20)
Template-12 73.7ms ± 1% 72.0ms ± 0% -2.33% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
TimeParse-12 358ns ± 1% 351ns ± 1% -2.07% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
TimeFormat-12 369ns ± 1% 356ns ± 0% -3.53% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
[Geo mean] 63.5µs 63.2µs -0.41%
name old speed new speed delta
GobDecode-12 88.3MB/s ± 0% 87.9MB/s ± 0% -0.43% (p=0.000 n=18+17)
GobEncode-12 116MB/s ± 1% 116MB/s ± 1% +0.47% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gzip-12 60.2MB/s ± 2% 60.8MB/s ± 1% +1.13% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Gunzip-12 453MB/s ± 0% 453MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.160 n=18+20)
JSONEncode-12 115MB/s ± 1% 112MB/s ± 1% -2.76% (p=0.000 n=19+20)
JSONDecode-12 32.5MB/s ± 0% 33.2MB/s ± 0% +2.09% (p=0.000 n=19+17)
GoParse-12 15.3MB/s ± 2% 15.4MB/s ± 2% +0.92% (p=0.004 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 311MB/s ± 1% 314MB/s ± 1% +0.78% (p=0.000 n=15+19)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 3.04GB/s ± 1% 2.95GB/s ± 1% -2.90% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 379MB/s ± 2% 380MB/s ± 2% ~ (p=0.779 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 2.04GB/s ± 1% 2.02GB/s ± 0% -0.62% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 7.46MB/s ± 1% 7.53MB/s ± 1% +0.86% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 25.5MB/s ± 1% 25.7MB/s ± 1% +0.78% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 15.4MB/s ± 1% 15.5MB/s ± 1% +0.62% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 16.4MB/s ± 1% 16.5MB/s ± 1% +0.82% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Revcomp-12 466MB/s ± 2% 466MB/s ± 3% ~ (p=0.765 n=19+20)
Template-12 26.3MB/s ± 1% 27.0MB/s ± 0% +2.38% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
[Geo mean] 97.8MB/s 98.0MB/s +0.23%
Change-Id: I281044ae0b24990ba46487cacbc1069493274bc4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13614
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
2015-08-12 21:43:43 -06:00
|
|
|
|
pcdata := pcdatavalue(f, _PCDATA_StackMapIndex, targetpc, nil)
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
if pcdata == -1 {
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
stkmap := (*stackmap)(funcdata(f, _FUNCDATA_LocalsPointerMaps))
|
|
|
|
|
if stkmap == nil || stkmap.n <= 0 {
|
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
bv := stackmapdata(stkmap, pcdata)
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
size := uintptr(bv.n) * sys.PtrSize
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
n := (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(t)).elem.size
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mask = make([]byte, n/sys.PtrSize)
|
|
|
|
|
for i := uintptr(0); i < n; i += sys.PtrSize {
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap := bv.bytedata
|
2015-11-11 10:39:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
off := (uintptr(p) + i - frame.varp + size) / sys.PtrSize
|
|
|
|
|
mask[i/sys.PtrSize] = (*addb(bitmap, off/8) >> (off % 8)) & 1
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|
runtime: replace GC programs with simpler encoding, faster decoder
Small types record the location of pointers in their memory layout
by using a simple bitmap. In Go 1.4 the bitmap held 4-bit entries,
and in Go 1.5 the bitmap holds 1-bit entries, but in both cases using
a bitmap for a large type containing arrays does not make sense:
if someone refers to the type [1<<28]*byte in a program in such
a way that the type information makes it into the binary, it would be
a waste of space to write a 128 MB (for 4-bit entries) or even 32 MB
(for 1-bit entries) bitmap full of 1s into the binary or even to keep
one in memory during the execution of the program.
For large types containing arrays, it is much more compact to describe
the locations of pointers using a notation that can express repetition
than to lay out a bitmap of pointers. Go 1.4 included such a notation,
called ``GC programs'' but it was complex, required recursion during
decoding, and was generally slow. Dmitriy measured the execution of
these programs writing directly to the heap bitmap as being 7x slower
than copying from a preunrolled 4-bit mask (and frankly that code was
not terribly fast either). For some tests, unrollgcprog1 was seen costing
as much as 3x more than the rest of malloc combined.
This CL introduces a different form for the GC programs. They use a
simple Lempel-Ziv-style encoding of the 1-bit pointer information,
in which the only operations are (1) emit the following n bits
and (2) repeat the last n bits c more times. This encoding can be
generated directly from the Go type information (using repetition
only for arrays or large runs of non-pointer data) and it can be decoded
very efficiently. In particular the decoding requires little state and
no recursion, so that the entire decoding can run without any memory
accesses other than the reads of the encoding and the writes of the
decoded form to the heap bitmap. For recursive types like arrays of
arrays of arrays, the inner instructions are only executed once, not
n times, so that large repetitions run at full speed. (In contrast, large
repetitions in the old programs repeated the individual bit-level layout
of the inner data over and over.) The result is as much as 25x faster
decoding compared to the old form.
Because the old decoder was so slow, Go 1.4 had three (or so) cases
for how to set the heap bitmap bits for an allocation of a given type:
(1) If the type had an even number of words up to 32 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type fit in no more than 16 bytes;
store the 4-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and copy from it.
(1b) If the type had an odd number of words up to 15 words, then
the 4-bit pointer mask for the type, doubled to end on a byte boundary,
fit in no more than 16 bytes; store that doubled mask directly in the
binary and copy from it.
(2) If the type had an even number of words up to 128 words,
or an odd number of words up to 63 words (again due to doubling),
then the 4-bit pointer mask would fit in a 64-byte unrolled mask.
Store a GC program in the binary, but leave space in the BSS for
the unrolled mask. Execute the GC program to construct the mask the
first time it is needed, and thereafter copy from the mask.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
(This is the case that was 7x slower than the other two.)
Because the new pointer masks store 1-bit entries instead of 4-bit
entries and because using the decoder no longer carries a significant
overhead, after this CL (that is, for Go 1.5) there are only two cases:
(1) If the type is 128 words or less (no condition about odd or even),
store the 1-bit pointer mask directly in the binary and use it to
initialize the heap bitmap during malloc. (Implemented in CL 9702.)
(2) There is no case 2 anymore.
(3) Otherwise, store a GC program and execute it to write directly to
the heap bitmap each time an object of that type is allocated.
Executing the GC program directly into the heap bitmap (case (3) above)
was disabled for the Go 1.5 dev cycle, both to avoid needing to use
GC programs for typedmemmove and to avoid updating that code as
the heap bitmap format changed. Typedmemmove no longer uses this
type information; as of CL 9886 it uses the heap bitmap directly.
Now that the heap bitmap format is stable, we reintroduce GC programs
and their space savings.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 7.59ns × (0.99,1.02) 5.16ns × (1.00,1.00) -32.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 21.0ns × (0.98,1.05) 21.4ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.179)
SetTypePtr16 24.1ns × (0.99,1.01) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) +2.41% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr32 31.2ns × (0.99,1.01) 32.4ns × (0.99,1.02) +3.72% (p=0.001)
SetTypePtr64 45.2ns × (1.00,1.00) 47.2ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 75.8ns × (0.99,1.01) 79.1ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 74.3ns × (0.99,1.01) 77.6ns × (1.00,1.01) +4.55% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 726ns × (1.00,1.01) 712ns × (1.00,1.00) -1.95% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode1 20.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.7ns × (1.00,1.00) +3.71% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 112ns × (1.00,1.00) 113ns × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.070)
SetTypeNode8 23.9ns × (1.00,1.00) 24.7ns × (1.00,1.01) +3.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 294ns × (0.99,1.02) 287ns × (0.99,1.01) -2.38% (p=0.015)
SetTypeNode64 52.8ns × (0.99,1.03) 51.8ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.069)
SetTypeNode64Slice 1.13µs × (0.99,1.05) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.00) ~ (p=0.767)
SetTypeNode64Dead 36.0ns × (1.00,1.01) 32.5ns × (0.99,1.00) -9.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 1.43µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.00) -2.39% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode124 75.7ns × (1.00,1.01) 79.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +4.44% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 1.94µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.04µs × (0.99,1.01) +4.98% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 75.4ns × (1.00,1.01) 77.7ns × (0.99,1.01) +3.11% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 1.95µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.03µs × (1.00,1.00) +3.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 85.4ns × (0.99,1.01) 122.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +42.89% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 2.20µs × (1.00,1.01) 2.36µs × (0.98,1.02) +7.48% (p=0.001)
SetTypeNode130 83.3ns × (1.00,1.00) 123.0ns × (1.00,1.00) +47.61% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 2.30µs × (0.99,1.01) 2.40µs × (0.98,1.01) +4.37% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 498ns × (1.00,1.00) 537ns × (1.00,1.00) +7.96% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 15.5µs × (0.99,1.01) 17.8µs × (1.00,1.00) +15.27% (p=0.000)
The above compares always using a cached pointer mask (and the
corresponding waste of memory) against using the programs directly.
Some slowdown is expected, in exchange for having a better general algorithm.
The GC programs kick in for SetTypeNode128, SetTypeNode130, SetTypeNode1024,
along with the slice variants of those.
It is possible that the cutoff of 128 words (bits) should be raised
in a followup CL, but even with this low cutoff the GC programs are
faster than Go 1.4's "fast path" non-GC program case.
Benchmarks for heapBitsSetType, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
SetTypePtr 6.89ns × (1.00,1.00) 5.17ns × (1.00,1.00) -25.02% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr8 25.8ns × (0.97,1.05) 21.5ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr16 39.8ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.7ns × (0.99,1.01) -37.81% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr32 68.8ns × (0.98,1.01) 32.2ns × (1.00,1.01) -53.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr64 130ns × (1.00,1.00) 47ns × (1.00,1.00) -63.67% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr126 241ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.25% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtr128 2.07µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.08µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.27% (p=0.000)
SetTypePtrSlice 1.05µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.72µs × (0.99,1.02) -31.70% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1 16.0ns × (0.99,1.01) 20.8ns × (0.99,1.03) +29.91% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1Slice 184ns × (0.99,1.01) 112ns × (0.99,1.01) -39.26% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8 29.5ns × (0.97,1.02) 24.6ns × (1.00,1.00) -16.50% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode8Slice 624ns × (0.98,1.02) 285ns × (1.00,1.00) -54.31% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64 135ns × (0.96,1.08) 52ns × (0.99,1.02) -61.32% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Slice 3.83µs × (1.00,1.00) 1.14µs × (0.99,1.01) -70.16% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64Dead 134ns × (0.99,1.01) 32ns × (1.00,1.01) -75.74% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode64DeadSlice 3.83µs × (0.99,1.00) 1.40µs × (1.00,1.01) -63.42% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 240ns × (0.99,1.01) 79ns × (1.00,1.01) -67.05% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124Slice 7.27µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.04µs × (1.00,1.00) -71.95% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126 2.06µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.08µs × (0.99,1.01) -96.23% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode126Slice 64.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.0µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.85% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128 2.09µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.15% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode128Slice 65.4µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.99,1.03) -96.39% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130 2.11µs × (1.00,1.00) 0.12µs × (1.00,1.00) -94.18% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode130Slice 66.3µs × (1.00,1.00) 2.4µs × (0.97,1.08) -96.34% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024 16.0µs × (1.00,1.01) 0.5µs × (1.00,1.00) -96.65% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode1024Slice 512µs × (1.00,1.00) 18µs × (0.98,1.04) -96.45% (p=0.000)
SetTypeNode124 uses a 124 data + 2 ptr = 126-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are using pointer bitmaps for this case,
so that's an overall 3x speedup for using pointer bitmaps.
SetTypeNode128 uses a 128 data + 2 ptr = 130-word allocation.
Both Go 1.4 and this CL are running the GC program for this case,
so that's an overall 17x speedup when using GC programs (and
I've seen >20x on other systems).
Comparing Go 1.4's SetTypeNode124 (pointer bitmap) against
this CL's SetTypeNode128 (GC program), the slow path in the
code in this CL is 2x faster than the fast path in Go 1.4.
The Go 1 benchmarks are basically unaffected compared to just before this CL.
Go 1 benchmarks, before this CL vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 5.87s × (0.97,1.04) 5.91s × (0.96,1.04) ~ (p=0.306)
Fannkuch11 4.38s × (1.00,1.00) 4.37s × (1.00,1.01) -0.22% (p=0.006)
FmtFprintfEmpty 90.7ns × (0.97,1.10) 89.3ns × (0.96,1.09) ~ (p=0.280)
FmtFprintfString 282ns × (0.98,1.04) 287ns × (0.98,1.07) +1.72% (p=0.039)
FmtFprintfInt 269ns × (0.99,1.03) 282ns × (0.97,1.04) +4.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 478ns × (0.99,1.02) 481ns × (0.99,1.02) +0.61% (p=0.048)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 399ns × (0.98,1.03) 400ns × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.533)
FmtFprintfFloat 563ns × (0.99,1.01) 570ns × (1.00,1.01) +1.37% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 1.89µs × (0.99,1.01) 1.92µs × (0.99,1.02) +1.88% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 15.2ms × (0.99,1.01) 15.2ms × (0.98,1.05) ~ (p=0.609)
GobEncode 11.6ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.9ms × (0.98,1.04) +2.17% (p=0.000)
Gzip 648ms × (0.99,1.01) 648ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.835)
Gunzip 142ms × (1.00,1.00) 143ms × (1.00,1.01) ~ (p=0.169)
HTTPClientServer 90.5µs × (0.98,1.03) 91.5µs × (0.98,1.04) +1.04% (p=0.045)
JSONEncode 31.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 31.4ms × (0.98,1.03) ~ (p=0.549)
JSONDecode 111ms × (0.99,1.01) 107ms × (0.99,1.01) -3.21% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) 6.01ms × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.878)
GoParse 6.54ms × (0.99,1.02) 6.61ms × (0.99,1.03) +1.08% (p=0.004)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 160ns × (1.00,1.01) 161ns × (1.00,1.00) +0.40% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 560ns × (0.99,1.01) 559ns × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.088)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 138ns × (0.99,1.01) 138ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.380)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 877ns × (1.00,1.00) 878ns × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.157)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 251ns × (0.99,1.00) 251ns × (1.00,1.01) +0.28% (p=0.021)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) 72.6µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.539)
RegexpMatchHard_32 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) 3.84µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.378)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 117µs × (1.00,1.00) 117µs × (1.00,1.00) ~ (p=0.067)
Revcomp 904ms × (0.99,1.02) 904ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.943)
Template 125ms × (0.99,1.02) 127ms × (0.99,1.01) +1.79% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 627ns × (0.99,1.01) 622ns × (0.99,1.01) -0.88% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 655ns × (0.99,1.02) 655ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.976)
For the record, Go 1 benchmarks, Go 1.4 vs this CL:
name old mean new mean delta
BinaryTree17 4.61s × (0.97,1.05) 5.91s × (0.98,1.03) +28.35% (p=0.000)
Fannkuch11 4.40s × (0.99,1.03) 4.41s × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.212)
FmtFprintfEmpty 102ns × (0.99,1.01) 84ns × (0.99,1.02) -18.38% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfString 302ns × (0.98,1.01) 303ns × (0.99,1.02) ~ (p=0.203)
FmtFprintfInt 313ns × (0.97,1.05) 270ns × (0.99,1.01) -13.69% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfIntInt 524ns × (0.98,1.02) 477ns × (0.99,1.00) -8.87% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 424ns × (0.98,1.02) 386ns × (0.99,1.01) -8.96% (p=0.000)
FmtFprintfFloat 652ns × (0.98,1.02) 594ns × (0.97,1.05) -8.97% (p=0.000)
FmtManyArgs 2.13µs × (0.99,1.02) 1.94µs × (0.99,1.01) -8.92% (p=0.000)
GobDecode 17.1ms × (0.99,1.02) 14.9ms × (0.98,1.03) -13.07% (p=0.000)
GobEncode 13.5ms × (0.98,1.03) 11.5ms × (0.98,1.03) -15.25% (p=0.000)
Gzip 656ms × (0.99,1.02) 647ms × (0.99,1.01) -1.29% (p=0.000)
Gunzip 143ms × (0.99,1.02) 144ms × (0.99,1.01) ~ (p=0.204)
HTTPClientServer 88.2µs × (0.98,1.02) 90.8µs × (0.98,1.01) +2.93% (p=0.000)
JSONEncode 32.2ms × (0.98,1.02) 30.9ms × (0.97,1.04) -4.06% (p=0.001)
JSONDecode 121ms × (0.98,1.02) 110ms × (0.98,1.05) -8.95% (p=0.000)
Mandelbrot200 6.06ms × (0.99,1.01) 6.11ms × (0.98,1.04) ~ (p=0.184)
GoParse 6.76ms × (0.97,1.04) 6.58ms × (0.98,1.05) -2.63% (p=0.003)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32 195ns × (1.00,1.01) 155ns × (0.99,1.01) -20.43% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 479ns × (0.98,1.03) 535ns × (0.99,1.02) +11.59% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32 169ns × (0.99,1.02) 131ns × (0.99,1.03) -22.44% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 1.53µs × (0.99,1.01) 0.87µs × (0.99,1.02) -43.07% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_32 334ns × (0.99,1.01) 242ns × (0.99,1.01) -27.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K 125µs × (1.00,1.01) 72µs × (0.99,1.03) -42.53% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_32 6.03µs × (0.99,1.01) 3.79µs × (0.99,1.01) -37.12% (p=0.000)
RegexpMatchHard_1K 189µs × (0.99,1.02) 115µs × (0.99,1.01) -39.20% (p=0.000)
Revcomp 935ms × (0.96,1.03) 926ms × (0.98,1.02) ~ (p=0.083)
Template 146ms × (0.97,1.05) 119ms × (0.99,1.01) -18.37% (p=0.000)
TimeParse 660ns × (0.99,1.01) 624ns × (0.99,1.02) -5.43% (p=0.000)
TimeFormat 670ns × (0.98,1.02) 710ns × (1.00,1.01) +5.97% (p=0.000)
This CL is a bit larger than I would like, but the compiler, linker, runtime,
and package reflect all need to be in sync about the format of these programs,
so there is no easy way to split this into independent changes (at least
while keeping the build working at each change).
Fixes #9625.
Fixes #10524.
Change-Id: I9e3e20d6097099d0f8532d1cb5b1af528804989a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9888
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2015-05-07 23:43:18 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// otherwise, not something the GC knows about.
|
|
|
|
|
// possibly read-only data, like malloc(0).
|
|
|
|
|
// must not have pointers
|
2015-04-27 22:28:47 -06:00
|
|
|
|
return
|
2015-01-16 12:43:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
}
|