1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-19 16:54:44 -07:00
go/src/pkg/runtime/arm/asm.s

277 lines
6.6 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
#include "arm/asm.h"
// using frame size $-4 means do not save LR on stack.
TEXT _rt0_arm(SB),7,$-4
MOVW $0xcafebabe, R12
// copy arguments forward on an even stack
// use R13 instead of SP to avoid linker rewriting the offsets
MOVW 0(R13), R0 // argc
MOVW $4(R13), R1 // argv
ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT Fix problems found. On amd64, various library routines had bigger stack frames than expected, because large function calls had been added. runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T 8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112 0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError -8 on entry to runtime.morestack01 runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E 16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T 16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect 56 after runtime.newselect uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault 56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo 0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120 -8 on entry to runtime.gosched On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should not have been, like the recursive function printpanics: printpanics: nosplit stack overflow 124 assumed on entry to printpanics 112 after printpanics uses 12 108 on entry to printpanics 96 after printpanics uses 12 92 on entry to printpanics 80 after printpanics uses 12 76 on entry to printpanics 64 after printpanics uses 12 60 on entry to printpanics 48 after printpanics uses 12 44 on entry to printpanics 32 after printpanics uses 12 28 on entry to printpanics 16 after printpanics uses 12 12 on entry to printpanics 0 after printpanics uses 12 -4 on entry to printpanics R=r, r2 CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 15:40:40 -07:00
SUB $64, R13 // plenty of scratch
AND $~7, R13
ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT Fix problems found. On amd64, various library routines had bigger stack frames than expected, because large function calls had been added. runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T 8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112 0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError -8 on entry to runtime.morestack01 runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E 16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T 16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect 56 after runtime.newselect uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault 56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo 0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120 -8 on entry to runtime.gosched On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should not have been, like the recursive function printpanics: printpanics: nosplit stack overflow 124 assumed on entry to printpanics 112 after printpanics uses 12 108 on entry to printpanics 96 after printpanics uses 12 92 on entry to printpanics 80 after printpanics uses 12 76 on entry to printpanics 64 after printpanics uses 12 60 on entry to printpanics 48 after printpanics uses 12 44 on entry to printpanics 32 after printpanics uses 12 28 on entry to printpanics 16 after printpanics uses 12 12 on entry to printpanics 0 after printpanics uses 12 -4 on entry to printpanics R=r, r2 CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 15:40:40 -07:00
MOVW R0, 60(R13) // save argc, argv away
MOVW R1, 64(R13)
// set up m and g registers
// g is R10, m is R9
MOVW $runtime·g0(SB), g
MOVW $runtime·m0(SB), m
// save m->g0 = g0
MOVW g, m_g0(m)
// create istack out of the OS stack
MOVW $(-8192+104)(R13), R0
MOVW R0, g_stackguard(g) // (w 104b guard)
MOVW R13, g_stackbase(g)
BL runtime·emptyfunc(SB) // fault if stack check is wrong
BL runtime·check(SB)
// saved argc, argv
ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT Fix problems found. On amd64, various library routines had bigger stack frames than expected, because large function calls had been added. runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T 8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112 0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError -8 on entry to runtime.morestack01 runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E 16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T 16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect 56 after runtime.newselect uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault 56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo 0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120 -8 on entry to runtime.gosched On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should not have been, like the recursive function printpanics: printpanics: nosplit stack overflow 124 assumed on entry to printpanics 112 after printpanics uses 12 108 on entry to printpanics 96 after printpanics uses 12 92 on entry to printpanics 80 after printpanics uses 12 76 on entry to printpanics 64 after printpanics uses 12 60 on entry to printpanics 48 after printpanics uses 12 44 on entry to printpanics 32 after printpanics uses 12 28 on entry to printpanics 16 after printpanics uses 12 12 on entry to printpanics 0 after printpanics uses 12 -4 on entry to printpanics R=r, r2 CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 15:40:40 -07:00
MOVW 60(R13), R0
MOVW R0, 4(R13)
ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT Fix problems found. On amd64, various library routines had bigger stack frames than expected, because large function calls had been added. runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T 8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112 0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError -8 on entry to runtime.morestack01 runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E 16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T 16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect 56 after runtime.newselect uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault 56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo 0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120 -8 on entry to runtime.gosched On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should not have been, like the recursive function printpanics: printpanics: nosplit stack overflow 124 assumed on entry to printpanics 112 after printpanics uses 12 108 on entry to printpanics 96 after printpanics uses 12 92 on entry to printpanics 80 after printpanics uses 12 76 on entry to printpanics 64 after printpanics uses 12 60 on entry to printpanics 48 after printpanics uses 12 44 on entry to printpanics 32 after printpanics uses 12 28 on entry to printpanics 16 after printpanics uses 12 12 on entry to printpanics 0 after printpanics uses 12 -4 on entry to printpanics R=r, r2 CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 15:40:40 -07:00
MOVW 64(R13), R1
MOVW R1, 8(R13)
BL runtime·args(SB)
BL runtime·osinit(SB)
BL runtime·schedinit(SB)
// create a new goroutine to start program
MOVW $runtime·mainstart(SB), R0
MOVW.W R0, -4(R13)
MOVW $8, R0
MOVW.W R0, -4(R13)
MOVW $0, R0
MOVW.W R0, -4(R13) // push $0 as guard
BL runtime·newproc(SB)
MOVW $12(R13), R13 // pop args and LR
// start this M
BL runtime·mstart(SB)
MOVW $1234, R0
MOVW $1000, R1
MOVW R0, (R1) // fail hard
B runtime·_dep_dummy(SB) // Never reached
TEXT runtime·mainstart(SB),7,$4
BL main·init(SB)
BL runtime·initdone(SB)
EOR R0, R0
MOVW R0, 0(R13)
BL main·main(SB)
MOVW $0, R0
MOVW R0, 4(SP)
BL runtime·exit(SB)
MOVW $1234, R0
MOVW $1001, R1
MOVW R0, (R1) // fail hard
RET
// TODO(kaib): remove these once i actually understand how the linker removes symbols
// pull in dummy dependencies
TEXT runtime·_dep_dummy(SB),7,$0
BL _div(SB)
BL _divu(SB)
BL _mod(SB)
BL _modu(SB)
BL _modu(SB)
BL _sfloat(SB)
TEXT runtime·breakpoint(SB),7,$0
// no breakpoint yet; let program exit
RET
/*
* go-routine
*/
// uintptr gosave(Gobuf*)
// save state in Gobuf; setjmp
TEXT runtime·gosave(SB), 7, $-4
MOVW 0(FP), R0 // gobuf
MOVW SP, gobuf_sp(R0)
MOVW LR, gobuf_pc(R0)
MOVW g, gobuf_g(R0)
MOVW $0, R0 // return 0
RET
// void gogo(Gobuf*, uintptr)
// restore state from Gobuf; longjmp
TEXT runtime·gogo(SB), 7, $-4
MOVW 0(FP), R1 // gobuf
MOVW 4(FP), R0 // return 2nd arg
MOVW gobuf_g(R1), g
MOVW 0(g), R2 // make sure g != nil
MOVW gobuf_sp(R1), SP // restore SP
MOVW gobuf_pc(R1), PC
// void gogocall(Gobuf*, void (*fn)(void))
// restore state from Gobuf but then call fn.
// (call fn, returning to state in Gobuf)
// using frame size $-4 means do not save LR on stack.
TEXT runtime·gogocall(SB), 7, $-4
MOVW 0(FP), R0 // gobuf
MOVW 4(FP), R1 // fn
MOVW 8(FP), R2 // fp offset
MOVW gobuf_g(R0), g
MOVW 0(g), R3 // make sure g != nil
MOVW gobuf_sp(R0), SP // restore SP
MOVW gobuf_pc(R0), LR
MOVW R1, PC
/*
* support for morestack
*/
// Called during function prolog when more stack is needed.
// R1 frame size
// R2 arg size
// R3 prolog's LR
// NB. we do not save R0 because we've forced 5c to pass all arguments
// on the stack.
// using frame size $-4 means do not save LR on stack.
TEXT runtime·morestack(SB),7,$-4
// Cannot grow scheduler stack (m->g0).
MOVW m_g0(m), R4
CMP g, R4
BL.EQ runtime·abort(SB)
// Save in m.
MOVW R1, m_moreframesize(m)
MOVW R2, m_moreargsize(m)
// Called from f.
// Set m->morebuf to f's caller.
MOVW R3, (m_morebuf+gobuf_pc)(m) // f's caller's PC
MOVW SP, (m_morebuf+gobuf_sp)(m) // f's caller's SP
MOVW $4(SP), R3 // f's argument pointer
MOVW R3, m_moreargp(m)
MOVW g, (m_morebuf+gobuf_g)(m)
// Set m->morepc to f's PC.
MOVW LR, m_morepc(m)
// Call newstack on m's scheduling stack.
MOVW m_g0(m), g
MOVW (m_sched+gobuf_sp)(m), SP
B runtime·newstack(SB)
// Called from reflection library. Mimics morestack,
// reuses stack growth code to create a frame
// with the desired args running the desired function.
//
// func call(fn *byte, arg *byte, argsize uint32).
TEXT reflect·call(SB), 7, $-4
// Save our caller's state as the PC and SP to
// restore when returning from f.
MOVW LR, (m_morebuf+gobuf_pc)(m) // our caller's PC
MOVW SP, (m_morebuf+gobuf_sp)(m) // our caller's SP
MOVW g, (m_morebuf+gobuf_g)(m)
// Set up morestack arguments to call f on a new stack.
// We set f's frame size to 1, as a hint to newstack
// that this is a call from reflect·call.
// If it turns out that f needs a larger frame than
// the default stack, f's usual stack growth prolog will
// allocate a new segment (and recopy the arguments).
MOVW 4(SP), R0 // fn
MOVW 8(SP), R1 // arg frame
MOVW 12(SP), R2 // arg size
MOVW R0, m_morepc(m) // f's PC
MOVW R1, m_moreargp(m) // f's argument pointer
MOVW R2, m_moreargsize(m) // f's argument size
MOVW $1, R3
MOVW R3, m_moreframesize(m) // f's frame size
// Call newstack on m's scheduling stack.
MOVW m_g0(m), g
MOVW (m_sched+gobuf_sp)(m), SP
B runtime·newstack(SB)
// Return point when leaving stack.
// using frame size $-4 means do not save LR on stack.
TEXT runtime·lessstack(SB), 7, $-4
// Save return value in m->cret
MOVW R0, m_cret(m)
// Call oldstack on m's scheduling stack.
MOVW m_g0(m), g
MOVW (m_sched+gobuf_sp)(m), SP
B runtime·oldstack(SB)
// void jmpdefer(fn, sp);
// called from deferreturn.
// 1. grab stored LR for caller
// 2. sub 4 bytes to get back to BL deferreturn
// 3. B to fn
TEXT runtime·jmpdefer(SB), 7, $0
MOVW 0(SP), LR
MOVW $-4(LR), LR // BL deferreturn
MOVW fn+0(FP), R0
MOVW argp+4(FP), SP
MOVW $-4(SP), SP // SP is 4 below argp, due to saved LR
B (R0)
TEXT runtime·memclr(SB),7,$20
MOVW 0(FP), R0
MOVW $0, R1 // c = 0
MOVW R1, -16(SP)
MOVW 4(FP), R1 // n
MOVW R1, -12(SP)
MOVW m, -8(SP) // Save m and g
MOVW g, -4(SP)
BL runtime·memset(SB)
MOVW -8(SP), m // Restore m and g, memset clobbers them
MOVW -4(SP), g
RET
TEXT runtime·getcallerpc(SB),7,$-4
MOVW 0(SP), R0
RET
TEXT runtime·setcallerpc(SB),7,$-4
MOVW x+4(FP), R0
MOVW R0, 0(SP)
RET
TEXT runtime·getcallersp(SB),7,$-4
MOVW 0(FP), R0
MOVW $-4(R0), R0
RET
// runcgo(void(*fn)(void*), void *arg)
// Just call fn(arg), but first align the stack
// appropriately for the gcc ABI.
// TODO(kaib): figure out the arm-gcc ABI
TEXT runtime·runcgo(SB),7,$16
BL runtime·abort(SB)
// MOVL fn+0(FP), AX
// MOVL arg+4(FP), BX
// MOVL SP, CX
// ANDL $~15, SP // alignment for gcc ABI
// MOVL CX, 4(SP)
// MOVL BX, 0(SP)
// CALL AX
// MOVL 4(SP), SP
// RET
TEXT runtime·emptyfunc(SB),0,$0
RET
TEXT runtime·abort(SB),7,$-4
MOVW $0, R0
MOVW (R0), R1
TEXT runtime·runcgocallback(SB),7,$0
MOVW $0, R0
MOVW (R0), R1